DX NetOps vs InfluxDB comparison

Broadcom and InfluxData are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.8, while InfluxData is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to InfluxData’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,841 Views
1,638 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Read 19 InfluxDB reviews

3,696 Views
739 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfluxDB and DX NetOps compete in data management and network operations. While InfluxDB is favored for its pricing and support, DX NetOps's comprehensive features offer significant value.

Features: InfluxDB handles high-performance time-series data, making it ideal for database management and IoT. It focuses on efficient data ingestion and query handling, and has flexibility with open-source integration. DX NetOps provides network performance monitoring, extensive visibility across network components, and sophisticated analytics with troubleshooting tools. The primary distinction is InfluxDB’s data-centric approach versus DX NetOps’s network analysis emphasis.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could enhance user-friendly interfaces, expand direct support options, and improve real-time data visualization tools. DX NetOps may benefit from reduced pricing tiers, streamlined setup processes, and more flexible integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX NetOps offers a scalable deployment model for large enterprises with integrated customer support for seamless implementation. InfluxDB provides flexibility via its open-source model for easy integration into various environments. However, DX NetOps features direct support channels for enhanced troubleshooting efficiency, while InfluxDB relies on community-driven assistance.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB provides a cost-effective solution with rapid setup and scalable pricing, delivering high ROI in data-intensive applications. DX NetOps requires a higher upfront investment but enhances network operational efficiency and delivers favorable ROI for network-focused enterprises. InfluxDB targets data-focused operations, while DX NetOps caters to network management.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

3.7

Organizations achieve positive ROI from DX NetOps within 1-1.5 years through cost savings, reduced downtime, and improved operations.

Sentiment score

6.1

InfluxDB improved operational efficiency by automating monitoring, reducing incident detection time, and reallocating analytics resources to higher-value tasks.

It can save you the cost of the product by reducing expenses and downtimes in 12 to 18 months.

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

For more quotes and insights, download the DX NetOps report

These improvements translated into both cost savings and better service reliability, directly impacting business outcomes.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

It simplifies processes and reduces the need for additional employees.

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project.

Btece Lodi

Student at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.2

Customer service quality for DX NetOps varies, with recent improvements and notable US team support, but response times fluctuate.

Sentiment score

6.2

Users find forums helpful, but premium support could improve follow-up; enterprise users appreciate expert support despite data challenges.

They are fast, responsive, and have technical expertise.

reviewer2718348

Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Everything about DX NetOps is perfect, including the interface, technical support, and pricing.

reviewer2773848

Customer Success Intern at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Creating a support case based on priority allows for immediate responses.

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

For more quotes and insights, download the DX NetOps report

They get on a call, resolve issues, and handle everything efficiently.

Manas Kashyap

DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital

The InfluxDB support team was knowledgeable and helped us troubleshoot complex problems efficiently.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

Obtaining that quantity of data directly from InfluxDB is quite challenging, and that is why we ask for help from the InfluxDB team to retrieve the data to avoid timeouts and those kinds of issues.

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.0

DX NetOps excels in scalability, efficiently managing diverse networks and large-scale operations, making it ideal for extensive network oversight.

Sentiment score

7.3

InfluxDB offers robust scalability for enterprise needs, effectively managing large data volumes and diverse environments with efficient performance.

The product is very scalable, to the maximum.

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

For more quotes and insights, download the DX NetOps report

The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.

Sayak Roy

Deployment Engineer at Derq

It can handle large volumes of time-series data and with high ingestion rates, making it suitable for enterprise-scale deployments.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.2

DX NetOps is praised for its stability, running smoothly without issues and receiving high ratings for dependable performance.

Sentiment score

8.0

InfluxDB is reliable and stable, though managing on-premises in non-cloud regions adds complexity; offers 99% uptime.

I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable.

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

For more quotes and insights, download the DX NetOps report

It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

We have used it to support mission-critical systems with continuous data ingestion and real-time analytics.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.

Btece Lodi

Student at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Room For Improvement

DX NetOps needs better support, UX/UI, enhanced features, integration, AI capabilities, and streamlined systems for improved efficiency.

InfluxDB's user experience needs improvement in interface, scalability, and security; enhancements in integration and advanced features are crucial.

DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly.

reviewer2718348

Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbon Black portfolio.

reviewer2773848

Customer Success Intern at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the DX NetOps report

InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.

Milan Predic

Chief Technology Officer at Presta Agency

Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.

reviewer2778060

Network engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Setup Cost

DX NetOps offers flexible and often affordable pricing compared to competitors, providing robust capabilities and technical support.

InfluxDB's flexible pricing demands strategic planning to balance server needs and costs for both cloud and on-premises solutions.

The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market.

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

I think the pricing is expensive.

reviewer2718348

Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the DX NetOps report

We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

I find the cloud version pricing of InfluxDB reasonable, and for the on-premises solution we use in our service, we need to purchase licenses.

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Pricing is based on data volume, retention, and features, which really makes it scalable but requires careful planning to avoid unexpected costs.

reviewer2804886

Senior Data Engineer at a university with 201-500 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Valuable Features

DX NetOps delivers scalable network monitoring with AI automation, top-notch analytics, and customizable dashboards for advanced visibility and management.

InfluxDB offers robust time-series features, seamless Grafana integration, real-time alerting, scalability, and efficient data handling for diverse applications.

The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices.

reviewer2718348

Senior Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

The most valuable feature in DX NetOps is the topological view, which is the network topological view.

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

For more quotes and insights, download the DX NetOps report

The most important feature for us is low latency, which is crucial in building a high-performance engine for day trading.

Milan Predic

Chief Technology Officer at Presta Agency

InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.

Henning Jansen

Senior System Developer at Norled

It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.

reviewer2761710

Solutions Engineer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the InfluxDB report

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (18th)

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (1st), Open Source Databases (7th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (16th), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
InfluxDB	0.3%
DX NetOps	0.7%
Other	99.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at Energybox

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

What do you like most about InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

InfluxDB can be improved in several ways. The Flux query language needs to be learned, but if there were something similar to SQL or previous options, it would be much easier for users without impo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB is for server management metrics, Kubernetes monitoring, and application performance monitoring due to the time series data involved. We have InfluxDB integrated with ...

See all answers

Comparisons

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 11% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 8% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

March 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

March 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure.

IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks.

Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance

Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.

Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users.

Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.

Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxData

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB

March 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.