DX NetOps vs InfluxDB comparison

Broadcom and InfluxData are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.3, while InfluxData is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to InfluxData’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 8 DX NetOps reviews

1,230 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Read 11 InfluxDB reviews

3,125 Views
469 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfluxDB and DX NetOps compete in data management and network operations. While InfluxDB is favored for its pricing and support, DX NetOps's comprehensive features offer significant value.

Features: InfluxDB handles high-performance time-series data, making it ideal for database management and IoT. It focuses on efficient data ingestion and query handling, and has flexibility with open-source integration. DX NetOps provides network performance monitoring, extensive visibility across network components, and sophisticated analytics with troubleshooting tools. The primary distinction is InfluxDB’s data-centric approach versus DX NetOps’s network analysis emphasis.

Room for Improvement: InfluxDB could enhance user-friendly interfaces, expand direct support options, and improve real-time data visualization tools. DX NetOps may benefit from reduced pricing tiers, streamlined setup processes, and more flexible integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX NetOps offers a scalable deployment model for large enterprises with integrated customer support for seamless implementation. InfluxDB provides flexibility via its open-source model for easy integration into various environments. However, DX NetOps features direct support channels for enhanced troubleshooting efficiency, while InfluxDB relies on community-driven assistance.

Pricing and ROI: InfluxDB provides a cost-effective solution with rapid setup and scalable pricing, delivering high ROI in data-intensive applications. DX NetOps requires a higher upfront investment but enhances network operational efficiency and delivers favorable ROI for network-focused enterprises. InfluxDB targets data-focused operations, while DX NetOps caters to network management.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 862,624 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (17th)

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (2nd), Open Source Databases (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (24th), NoSQL Databases (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis

There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Read full review

DeepakR

Site Reliability Engineer(Observability) at Sapiens

An open-source database that can be used to insert data

InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is stable."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

More DX NetOps pros

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"In our case, it started with a necessity to fill the gap that we had in monitoring. We had very reactive monitoring without trend analysis and without some advanced features. We were able to implement them by using a time series database. We are able to have all the data from applications, logs, and systems, and we can use a simple query language to correlate all the data and make things happen, especially with monitoring. We could more proactively monitor our systems and our players' trends."

"InfluxDB's best feature is that it's a cloud offering. Other good features include its time-series DB, fast time-bulk queries, and window operations."

"The solution is very powerful."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."

"InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data from servers. It must be installed on Windows or Linux servers. During installation, ensure that the configuration file is correct to prevent issues. Once data is collected, it can be sent to InfluxDB. For visualization, you can use open-source tools like Grafana."

More InfluxDB pros

Cons

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

More DX NetOps cons

"InfluxDB cannot be used for high-cardinality data. It's also difficult and time-consuming to write queries, and there are some issues with bulk API."

"In terms of features that I would like to see or have, in the community version, some features are not available. I would like to have clustering and authentication in the community version."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"I've tried both on-premises and cloud-based deployments, and each has its limitations."

"InfluxDB can improve by including new metrics on other technologies. They had some changes recently to pool data from endpoints but the functionality is not good enough in the industry."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface."

"One area for improvement is the querying language. InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying."

More InfluxDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The tool is an open-source product."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX NetOps?

It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

I think the pricing is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

We have not used the predictive analytics capability of DX NetOps in impacting our network management processes. My experience with using automated root cause analysis is that it tells the symptoms...

See all answers

What do you like most about InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster. Replicating data for on-prem development and testing is difficult. Having a SQL abstrac...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is the main component in our large enterprise-scale streaming data application for maritime vessels. We collect position data from vessels around the coast once per second, put it on a Kaf...

See all answers

Comparisons

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 23% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

ThousandEyes vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 25% of the time

MongoDB vs InfluxDB

Compared 17% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

ScyllaDB vs InfluxDB

Compared 6% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

July 2025

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

July 2025

Download InfluxDB product report

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure.

IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks.

Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance

Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.

Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users.

Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.

Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxData

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB

July 2025

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

862,624 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.