Druva inSync vs Quorum OnQ comparison

"All the data is well encrypted. In addition, the data is split into pieces so that if an endpoint is attacked or compromised with any kind of ransomware, the compromised machine can be relocated or restored. All the data that was previously backed up can be restored from the cloud. It has a lot of security features. Druva currently offers only the cloud version on AWS. Being a cloud solution, Druva goes by a lot of security compliances and provides a security portfolio. People are very skeptical of the data security in cloud solutions, and Druva has given consideration to that. It has some good geo-location features. If a machine is lost, when the machine is switched on and connected to the internet, that machine can be geo-located and tracked. It also has got the geo-wipeout feature. If someone tries to take out the data from a lost machine, they won't be able to do that. The moment an IT admin comes to know that the machine is no longer with a user, he or she can auto-run the geo-wipeout feature so that the data cannot be read by any third party. Duality replication is a unique thing about this solution. Everybody's data is not backed up if the data is common. Similar data is not backed up from other machines. The data backup also happens very smoothly. The bandwidth choking is very less. When the data is getting backed up, the users do not even get to know. There is no impact even when the users are not using high-speed bandwidth."

"Druva is offered as a service so that we can access it from any enterprise-based browser or URL. We also have a single sign-on, which allows me to log in securely. Hence, I can easily access the system, configure it, perform day-to-day monitoring tasks, and check for any issues or configurations needed. Overall, it's a simple and easy-to-use tool with a high-speed and straightforward interface for management."

"If you are looking for a backup solution, go with Druva because it's quite simple."

"It is simple to implement and use. It's very flexible."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 10."

"The way they handle the backups is pretty good."

"The recovery aspect of the solution is its most valuable feature."

"The tool has good features. The backup is also accurate."

"One of the most valuable features was the usability, since many of the features were very straightforward. The backup and restoration process was also very fast. Although we weren't able to fully test the scenarios, one of the features was that we could have it restored on a remote site. However, since we were on-prem, we weren't able to test the remote site restoration."

"The biggest feature is being able to do a file recovery to the original server. That is extremely useful and has saved us a few times when we've had ransomware. In some of those cases, people's computers were locked down by viruses which spread to things they had access to, including server shares. But we were easily able to just restore to four hours prior, instead of a day or two or more ago."

"A very high level security environment for secondary data."

"I like this product because it is easy to use."

"It's easy to implement, easy to spin up, easily configurable, to drop-in appliances and network. There wasn't a lot of time needed to spin it up."

"The solution is very cost effective."

"Quorum OnQ has taken the guesswork out of backup/recovery and disaster recovery."

"The most useful feature is the one-click recovery."

"I would like to see security improved in the next release."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"The user quota is an area that needs to be improved."

"This solution would benefit from the inclusion of an on-premise backup feature, as currently, they are offering everything in the cloud."

"It would be good if bare metal backups were possible."

"The backup time is very poor. The backup runs continuously. It goes on from morning till night. The system performance also becomes very poor when Druva inSync is running."

"One functionality I would like is the ability to manage multiple Office 365 tenants from a single console."

"To make Druva inSync better, they can implement additional DLP."

"The one thing they could do is some tweaking on the web solution that's supposed to monitor everything from one page, rather than having to bring each server up on its own webpage. It doesn't always accurately show what the system's state is at the time, and we have to restart that process now and then."

"Quorum OnQ's user interface is not very attractive and should be made more attractive."

"The user interface needs to be improved."

"It would be beneficial if file culling could be more granular."

"One thing that could be done to improve it would be a single pane of glass for doing disaster recovery testing, where I could have remote consoles in one place... I still have to go to each location in a browser and then bring up the console. I'd like to see them integrate that into a single pane of glass so I don't have to go to each server."

"I would like to see iSCSI support added so that NAS storage servers could be protected. We heavily utilize NAS storage and the risk there is minimal backup options. Currently, we are backing up NAS to NAS which is costly and slow. Being able to integrate NAS server backup would be the last item on my Quorum bucket list."

"It feels to me like it's going to be a little bit more work than I originally anticipated when upgrading the appliance. I haven't done that yet so I can't speak from true experience, but I went through the project plan and it feels to me like there's quite a number of pieces and components and things that have to be done. Quorum is going to manage the rollout, but in starting the initial conversation there were a lot of unanswered questions"

"There was a situation I faced in the past when I contacted the tool's support team, and it took them a while to respond."

"The pricing is thirty-five dollars per year or three dollars per month per user."

"The price is quite good, It's approximately $4000.00 per user for one year."

"The pricing is good."

"The product is fairly priced, I would rate its pricing five out of ten."

"Out of all the solutions we evaluated, Druva inSync was the most affordable."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with one being very cheap and ten being very expensive."

"It is an expensive product for the middle class or SMB customers in India. A lot of top-level big companies also cannot afford this solution. During the license period, one can download the entire data from the cloud without paying any additional cost. This way the data can be easily recreated from the stored data when a machine is lost or the data is compromised."

"Once you decide to go with this product the cost can be worked out with the vendor."

"The initial expenditure for us was a little under $40,000 for the recent renewal. For the first three years after that, other than electricity, there's no cost. After that, their support contract has to be renewed annually. We spent close to $6,000, between the two offices, for support."

"The pricing is about $1,400 a month. It's a little bit on the higher side. But it's one of those situations where time is valuable for me. So if it costs a little bit more money for me to have a solution that just works and requires less of my day-to-day management, I'm willing to pay a little bit more."

"The cost is higher than other software and services, but it is an absolute must-have."

"Quorum OnQ can be described as a medium-priced product...There are no ingress and egress charges in the product."

"I am not sure how much it costs, but I know it's expensive."

"When we first got the Quorum the licensing was different."

"When we quote the price of Quorum to customers, they find it expensive."

"The solution’s pricing is economical."