Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud comparison

Dotcom-Monitor and OpenText are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Dotcom-Monitor is ranked #21, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Dotcom-Monitor holds a 0.4% mindshare in LTT, compared to OpenText’s 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Dotcom-Monitor users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Read 3 Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing reviews

128 Views
8 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Read 45 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud reviews

2,703 Views
74 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud are products competing in the software testing domain. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView appears to have the upper hand in pricing and support, while OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers advanced features.

Features: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView offers real browser-based testing, global load injection, and comprehensive results analysis. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud provides extensive protocol support, scalability, and integration with CI/CD tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers seamless cloud-based deployment for quick setup and scaling. Dotcom-Monitor LoadView ensures a straightforward deployment process with robust customer service support.

Pricing and ROI: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView provides a cost-effective solution with flexible pricing tiers and lower entry costs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud justifies its higher initial costs with a comprehensive feature set that delivers substantial ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Str...

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

21st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is 9.5%, up from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1631949

Solutions Architect ICT at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

User-friendly, cheap, and quick to set up

It's actually quite easy to set it up. You can change your upgrade plan at any time. The pricing is reasonable. The support was also very good. They are great at helping you set it up. Overall, it's user-friendly. I like that you can also use different servers, which I used in Europe or in different contexts. The reporting is okay. I can get notifications via email, which is nice. Everything is immediate and in real-time.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Cloud-based testing accommodates high user scenarios while anticipating location improvement

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines. This scalability and network bandwidth capability are essential for high-scale load testing. Additionally, it allows me to upload common LoadRunner scripts to the cloud for testing without requiring a license for scripting tools, offering a flexible and comfortable high-scale load testing solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The product supports a wide variety of technology compared to any other tool."

"The most useful features of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud include getting load through the Performance Center, which is part of the cloud version, where we can monitor CPU and memory utilization, and response times."

"Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore."

"I would rate OpenText LoadRunner Cloud a ten out of ten for scalability."

"The solution can scale."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to configure browser settings for different operating systems and on different versions without the need to install every single version on each machine and to manage them."

"It is feature-rich. It supports most protocols, which is important because I am in charge of a team at the bank, and we do performance testing for all kinds of different applications. We have tons of them. We even do video streams."

"One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pros

Cons

"A lot of time you start the stress testing, and you sign the log in again, and I want to get rid of that. It's just not clear to me how to do it yet."

"We did have some challenges with the initial implementation."

"I have faced several problems using the cloud in different locations, so I rate the stability a six out of ten."

"There is a steep learning curve for the product, too."

"One area of improvement in the software's support is the replaying of captured data within the development environment. It would be beneficial if the replay feature could accurately mimic what the actual application is doing for better analysis and testing."

"The initial setup is complex, but that is the nature of the technology."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"Their documentation is not technical enough for us. We would like to have much deeper technical documentation so that we can self-serve without constantly having to go back to them and ask."

"The product price could be more affordable."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can buy plans that range from free to $500 a month."

"The solution’s price is considerably high."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"We make use of virtual user hours. We buy time in the LoadRunner Cloud. It costs around $80,000."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner. The hourly usage model allows cost-saving when used rightly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing

Compared 100% of the time

More Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 29% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 23% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

June 2025

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing report

Download Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

May 2025

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud product report

Also Known As

LoadView Stress Testing

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Overview

LoadView provides scalable external load testing using real browsers. Spin up virtual machines in the Amazon, Google or Rackspace clouds without having to manage cloud accounts. Record scripts and run stress tests on demand. Learn more at https://www.loadview-testing.com

Dotcom-Monitor

Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Citrix, Aflac, Xerox, American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Dotcom-Monitor LoadView Stress Testing vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.