Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Domo vs Dundas Dashboard comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Domo's effectiveness varies widely, offering cost savings and efficiency for some, while others find it costly and inefficient.
Sentiment score
8.3
Dundas Dashboard enhanced collaboration and transparency, proving cost-effective with $0.50/hour usage and positive user feedback.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Domo's customer service is responsive but faces communication delays and gaps between support teams, impacting smaller clients.
Sentiment score
8.4
Dundas Dashboard customer service is praised for prompt and effective support, though some report limited out-of-hours assistance.
While they eventually provide the correct answers, their support for smaller customers could be improved.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
Domo efficiently scales with diverse user groups and data, though performance may vary with massive datasets, facing competition.
Sentiment score
7.2
Dundas Dashboard reliably scales for numerous users and markets, maintaining performance, especially with SSAS, despite multi-server implementation challenges.
Sigma, which is written for Snowflake, scales more easily than Domo.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Domo is generally stable, handling large data efficiently, with minor data refresh issues and connectivity dependent on internet quality.
Sentiment score
6.0
Dundas Dashboard generally stable but can slow under heavy loads; occasional crashes and obscure errors hinder reliability.
 

Room For Improvement

Domo users seek improved data integration, visualization, browser compatibility, cost-effectiveness, and support, while desiring enhanced collaboration and customization features.
Dundas Dashboard needs better parameters, alternative to Silverlight, expanded visualizations, enhanced UI, easier installation, and improved documentation.
End users require a license to run their own reports and dashboards, which are fairly expensive.
 

Setup Cost

Domo's pricing is higher but justified by robust features, flexible licensing, and included cloud infrastructure reducing IT needs.
Domo is expensive compared to other solutions.
 

Valuable Features

Domo excels in ETL, data visualization, governance, and collaboration, offering user-friendly tools for handling complex data tasks.
Dundas Dashboard excels in customization, ease of data integration, and offers interactive features, creative design, and helpful resources.
I have been using it for four years and have been able to extract the information I need from it.
 

Categories and Ranking

Domo
Ranking in Data Visualization
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (40th), BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (13th), Business Performance Management (13th), Reporting (10th)
Dundas Dashboard
Ranking in Data Visualization
39th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Data Visualization category, the mindshare of Domo is 9.4%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dundas Dashboard is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Visualization
 

Featured Reviews

Sumit  Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Fast installation, reliable, with proven results for small to mid-size companies
The scalability is excellent. We have input close to fifty billion rows in Domo, and this is where we saw the cards winded in pretty slowly. So we had a performance issue there, but say maximum up to twenty-five to thirty billion, this product is flawless. But when we talk about big data analytics with too many self-service components, this is where we see some performance depreciation. We have more than two hundred using the solution.
reviewer2116137 - PeerSpot reviewer
It's useful for reporting on IoT KPIs, but it isn't as robust or user-friendly as some competing solutions
I was a little disappointed in Dundas. I found other tools like Tableau and Power BI to be more powerful. I intended to use Dundus as an organizational BI tool, but I think there's a significant learning curve with Dundas versus the others. The user experience and UI could also improve. It should be simpler for end users who don't have much technical knowledge. I have an IT background, but I think it might be challenging for anyone who is unfamiliar with databases.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Visualization solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
University
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Domo?
All our client SLAs and daily and weekly dashboards are tracked on Domo.
What needs improvement with Domo?
Domo is the premium option of all the choices. It has fancy features including a built-in chat program with the Buzz feature that no one uses. When I arrived about a year ago, we had 12 different w...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

corda
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Capco, SABMiller, Stance, eBay, Sage North America, Goodwill Industries of Central Indiana, Telus, The Cliffs, OGIO International Inc., and many more!
Coca Cola, Siemens, HP, Verizon, Microsoft, NHS, Scotiabank, KPMG, Bayer, Schneider Electric, Teck, Pitney Bowes, Amtrak
Find out what your peers are saying about Domo vs. Dundas Dashboard and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.