No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS vs ReadMe comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
448th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadMe
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
35th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Arkajyoti Misra - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Director at Husk Power Systems
Containerization has accelerated testing cycles and consistently reduced time to market
Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is a very mature product, and I don't think there is a lot of improvement that they need to do on their end. The Docker team is coming up with new features, and integration with the IDE, for example, would be amazing. Support on Windows is not so great from Docker, so that is something that they could examine. I chose nine out of ten for Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS because I think they could improve a little more on optimization. It sometimes demands a lot of RAM and computing power, so that is one area that the Docker team could improve upon.
TejaswiniAleti - PeerSpot reviewer
Member Technical at ADP
Centralized API documentation has improved collaboration and reduces onboarding time
Overall, I have had a positive experience with ReadMe, but there are a few areas where I think it could improve. One is customization. While it is easy to create clean documentation, making deeper UI or layout customizations can be somewhat limiting without additional effort. Having more built-in customization options would help teams tailor the developer portal to their branding and documentation needs. I would also like to see more advanced analytics. It would be useful to have richer insights into which APIs are viewed most frequently, where developers spend the most time, and which document pages generate the most support requests. Those metrics could help us continuously improve our documentation. Another improvement would be the tighter integration with Git-based development workflows. While synchronizing documentation works well, making documentation updates, previews, and reviews even more seamless as part of the pull request process would improve the developer experience. All of these are not major issues. They are enhancements that would make an already solid platform even better. Overall, ReadMe has worked well for our API documentation needs. An additional improvement I would like to see is better support for documentation versioning and change tracking. In enterprise applications, APIs evolve over time, and having more intuitive tools to compare versions and clearly highlight changes would make it easier for both internal teams and external consumers to adopt new API versions. I would also appreciate more built-in collaboration features, such as richer review workflows or commenting capabilities for documentation changes before they are published. That would make it easier for developers, QA teams, and technical writers to review documentation together and keep it accurate. Other than those enhancements, I think ReadMe is an easy-to-use platform that has met our API documentation needs. I do not have any major concerns beyond the improvements I already mentioned.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Ease of use from the developer's point of view is the best feature."
"Fast deployment is the main benefit."
"Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS positively impacts my organization because we have sped up our development very quickly, and our team has grown quickly, not only because of Docker but also due to Docker."
"Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS makes both managing and deploying that service easier for me."
"With ReadMe serving as a clear, self-service developer portal, our partners can now complete their integration in a fraction of the time, which has accelerated project delivery timelines, improved our partner satisfaction, and optimized engineering promises."
"Overall, if your organization wants to improve the developer experience, reduce repetitive support questions, and provide a centralized and professional API portal, I think ReadMe is a strong choice."
"Instead of investing time in documentation, ReadMe can document entire APIs quickly and we can just go and do a review, saving a lot of time instead of spending a couple of days or three days on documentation."
"Previously, our documentation was split up, but now it is unified through ReadMe, which gives a clear overview and is very easy to navigate, acting as a single source of truth for our business and providing more stability."
 

Cons

"Support on Windows is not so great from Docker, so that is something that they could examine."
"Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is stable enough, but again, it is very old."
"Maybe the daemons need to be improved, as they consume a lot of resources for building and running images."
"I have not seen a return on investment that I can quantify, and I do not have specific metrics to share regarding fewer employees needed, money saved, or time saved."
"We could probably have more advanced analytics, multi-domain support, or something similar, and advanced access controls."
"One is customization. While it is easy to create clean documentation, making deeper UI or layout customizations can be somewhat limiting without additional effort."
"On a scale of one to ten, I rate ReadMe overall as eight out of ten. I choose eight out of ten because it is a very strict platform with limited customization."
"ReadMe is a software-as-a-service offering only, and there is no way to self-host ReadMe."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
42%
Healthcare Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Outsourcing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS?
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is very good. I do not see a lot of challenges there, and it definitely provides value for money.
What needs improvement with Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS?
Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is a very mature product, and I don't think there is a lot of improvement that they need to do on their end. The Docker team is coming up with new features, and integ...
What is your primary use case for Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS?
My main use case for Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is containerizing our applications so that we are able to test it before deployment. Even the developers do a lot of development level testing before...
What needs improvement with ReadMe?
ReadMe is a very new tool and I have not used it much, but what we are doing right now is great, so I do not think there is any improvement needed. One thing is that I think there is some limitatio...
What is your primary use case for ReadMe?
Our main use case for ReadMe is that we will be having a lot of APIs and we wanted to document them very well. We were using Swagger, but ReadMe provides more interactive API documentation with goo...
What advice do you have for others considering ReadMe?
ReadMe is deployed in our organization in a dev environment where we do testing and documentation. We use it in a dev environment which is only accessible for our organization. We use Azure as our ...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Docker on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS vs. ReadMe and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.