Cybereason XDR vs NetWitness NDR comparison

Cybereason and NetWitness are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while NetWitness is ranked #37. Cybereason holds a 0.7% mindshare in XDR, compared to NetWitness’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of NetWitness users who would recommend it.

Cybereason XDR

Read 3 Cybereason XDR reviews

1,479 Views
473 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetWitness NDR

Read 15 NetWitness NDR reviews

638 Views
493 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Cybereason XDR

NetWitness NDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

NetWitness NDR and Cybereason XDR compete in the security market. Cybereason XDR is often favored for its comprehensive capabilities and high ROI, while NetWitness NDR is acknowledged for its cost-effectiveness and simplicity in deployment.

Features: NetWitness NDR offers robust threat detection, pricing benefits, and strong support. Cybereason XDR provides consolidated management, automated response features, and extensive third-party integrations.

Room for Improvement: NetWitness NDR users desire enhanced customization options, improved reporting clarity, and better threat intelligence. Cybereason XDR users suggest improvements in log management, increased threat intelligence capabilities, and optimization of the setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetWitness NDR is recognized for straightforward deployment and efficient support. Cybereason XDR presents some challenges in setup but benefits from responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: NetWitness NDR is praised for competitive pricing and good ROI. Cybereason XDR, although more expensive initially, is perceived by users to provide a strong return on investment due to its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason XDR vs. NetWitness NDR Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. NetWitness NDR

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason XDR

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetWitness NDR

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

37th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (59th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (36th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (63rd), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (25th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason XDR is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetWitness NDR is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Peter Nowak

Business Development Manager for Cybereason at Bechtle

Integration of multiple firewalls enables advanced threat detection

The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable. Cybereason XDR facilitates two-way communication, where the firewall sends data to the Cybereason system, and it can communicate with the firewall to stop unwanted communication. Customers can deal with multiple types of firewalls with ease. The behavioral analytics help detect advanced threats when attackers use existing software. The multilayered protection approach, including NGAV, integrates XDR detection with antivirus to assess and counter threats effectively.

Read full review

SupravatMaji

Associate Vice President - IT Security at Inspira Enterprise

Beneficial single unified dashboard, good native application integration, and high availability

My advice to those wanting to implement RSA NetWitness Network is they have to first do a little due diligence, such as the exact requirement based on their needs. That will give them a direction for their investment because otherwise, the bill of material or bill of quantity (BOQ) may be higher side. It is important to do good due intelligence on the environment, see the exact requirement, and then go ahead with the solution. The solution is perfectly stable. I rate RSA NetWitness Network a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"Cybereason XDR's most useful feature is the investigation."

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines."

"They have recently updated the features and the most valuable ones are the instant threat response, ease of use, web interface, integration, and easy access. RSA NetWitness Endpoint is very compatible with other solutions and technologies. However, they do not rely on third-party solutions and have most features built-in."

"Ability to isolate the machine when there are malicious files."

"The most valuable feature is the way it captures the traffic, and it contains every detail of the communication."

"We've contacted technical support several times. They've been very good. They have been able to help us resolve our issues."

"Technical support is knowledgeable."

"It is very easy to use, and its usability is great. The use cases are also very easy. The visualizations of the use cases are magnificent. You cannot find this in any other solution. From my point of view, it is great."

"This solution allows us to locate the malware in real-time."

"The log correlation is good."

More NetWitness NDR pros

Cons

"Customer service is rated as a five out of ten. When they work and reach the right level, they are helpful, but getting to the right person can be time-consuming."

"There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems."

"The one thing we sometimes have issues with is its integration with other security applications like antiviruses."

"Cybereason's customer support could be better."

"The integration of the solution needs to be improved. The dashboard needs lots of updates as well. In the next release, we would like to see advanced fraud detection features."

"The initial setup requires a high level of skill."

"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."

"The threat intelligence could improve in RSA NetWitness Endpoint."

"Its price could be improved. It is an expensive product. Its training is also too expensive. It would be great if they can have a better pricing scheme for the training."

"This solution needs an upgrade in reporting. I have heard from RSA that they are working on this, but as of yet it is not available."

"The contamination feature could be improved."

"We would like to see the hunting and investigation features of this solution improved, in order to provide better visibility of issues."

More NetWitness NDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheaper than Microsoft Defender. It has a subscription and no standard license."

"They can easily adjust if you have the requirements which are required. If you have a budget cut or a budget constraint, they can bend."

"NetWitness Endpoint is less costly than its competitors, but it offers fewer features."

"With RSA, there is flexibility in choosing the service, products, and the range that meets your requirement, as well as they are flexible in terms of pricing."

"We are on a three-year contract to use RSA NetWitness Network."

"It is an expensive product."

"The price of the solution depends on the environment. If the environment is large then it will cost more. However, the larger the environment with more endpoints, you will receive an increased discount. If the environment is very small, then you might think it is expensive. It is always better to buy in bulk to receive a discount. The minimum number of assets is usually 500, with discounts on 1000 and 2000."

"The cost depends on the number of endpoints that you want to monitor, but it is not expensive."

"It is highly scalable. It can be bought based on your requirements."

More NetWitness NDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

25%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cybereason XDR?

The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cybereason XDR?

There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems. Additionally, technical support has been slow in recent times. Enabling multifactor authentication has been problematic fo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason XDR?

I use Cybereason XDR for customers who don't have a SOC or managed SOC yet and want to be protected on more than their desktops. It is especially used in the manufacturing industry, yet not exclusi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 47% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 27% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 15% of the time

Cynet vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 12% of the time

More Cybereason XDR Competitors

Darktrace vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 14% of the time

Fidelis Elevate vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 11% of the time

Vectra AI vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 9% of the time

Corelight vs NetWitness NDR

Compared 7% of the time

More NetWitness NDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

May 2025

Download Cybereason XDR product report

Buyer's Guide

NetWitness NDR

April 2025

Download NetWitness NDR product report

Also Known As

No data available

RSA ECAT, NetWitness Network

Overview

Cybereason is the leader in endpoint protection, offering endpoint detection and response, next-generation antivirus, and managed monitoring services. Founded by elite intelligence professionals born and bred in offense-first hunting, Cybereason gives enterprises the upper hand over cyber adversaries.

Cybereason

Using a centralized combination of network and endpoint analysis, behavioral analysis, data science techniques and threat intelligence, NetWitness NDR helps analysts detect and resolve known and unknown attacks while automating and orchestrating the incident response lifecycle. With these capabilities on one platform, security teams can collapse disparate tools and data into a powerful, blazingly fast user interface.

NetWitness

Sample Customers

MOTOROLA MOBILITY

ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. NetWitness NDR

April 2025

Free Report: Cybereason XDR vs. NetWitness NDR

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason XDR vs. NetWitness NDR and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason XDR vs. NetWitness NDR report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.