CyberArk Identity vs Venafi comparison

CyberArk Identity and Venafi are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. CyberArk Identity is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8, while Venafi is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.5. CyberArk Identity holds a 1.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Venafi’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of CyberArk Identity users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Venafi users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 23 CyberArk Identity reviews

652 Views
200 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Venafi

Read 8 Venafi reviews

762 Views
239 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Venafi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Venafi and CyberArk Identity are two leading security solutions competing in the field of identity and certificate management. CyberArk Identity seems to have the upper hand due to its broader range of features and easier deployment processes.

What features are offered by Venafi in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Venafi provides robust automation capabilities, effective management of machine identities, and comprehensive certificate management. CyberArk Identity offers advanced access controls, extensive user management features, and a highly feature-rich identity and access management system.

What areas of improvement can be found in Venafi in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Venafi could improve its integration capabilities with other systems, reduce the complexity of initial setups, and enhance its usability for larger-scale operations. CyberArk Identity needs better scalability, more intuitive operation processes, and improvements in its overall user interface.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Venafi in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Venafi's deployment models are often seen as complex, requiring significant expertise and time, although their customer service is positively reviewed. CyberArk Identity offers more straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and support resources, earning higher user ratings for ease of deployment and customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Venafi in comparison to CyberArk Identity?

Venafi's setup costs are high, requiring substantial initial investment, but it provides a good ROI for businesses in need of machine identity management. CyberArk Identity is perceived as more expensive; however, its extensive features justify the cost, providing better ROI by addressing a broader range of identity security needs.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. Venafi Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Venafi

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Authentication Systems

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (10th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (6th), Active Directory Management (8th), Cloud Resource Access Management (2nd), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (8th)

Venafi

Ranking in Authentication Systems

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 1.9%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venafi is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

Julio Montero

Access Management Analyst at Telefónica

Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication

The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.

Read full review

Adam Goldstein

Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Automates certificate management across platforms and has enhanced integration support

Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively. We integrated it with GlobalSign and aimed to automate DNS verification, although challenges remained. Venafi's platform-agnostic nature was beneficial for handling certificates across different systems like IIS, AWS, and Azure. It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices. It significantly improved our operational efficiency by automating certificate workflows. This reduced the number of certificates requiring manual management, freeing internal resources from deploying trivial certificates. While some complex certificates still needed manual intervention, automating simpler ones eliminated internal bottlenecks associated with tasks like uploading certificates to Imperva. By automating these processes, we reduced errors, streamlined workflows, and eliminated the need to repeatedly remember and execute complex procedures, ultimately increasing our overall operational efficiency. The automation capabilities are good; when properly configured, it performs as expected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CyberArk Identity provides identity governance and gives me control over who and how access to environments occurs, offering significant confidentiality in what is accessed."

"The setup, via cloud, is simple."

"Overall, I would rate CyberArk Identity a nine out of ten."

"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward."

"It has machine learning and can help clients to learn the environment and understand what is happening."

"The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."

"I found the solution to be stable."

"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"The support is definitely great. What I like best about Venafi is that it's very easy to get somebody on a call and get any of my questions answered. That's probably the biggest thing. Besides the fact that it's a mature product and it works, the support is a big deal."

"Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively."

"The most valuable feature of Venafi is the automation that helps save time and reduce human error."

"The most valuable feature of Venafi is that it provides a seamless user interface and integrations."

"It's definitely worth the money to have Venafi as a tool; it's definitely miles away from the competition, in my opinion."

"We have reduced 80% to 90% of our outages with Venafi, which impacts the revenue substantially."

"We use Venafi for PKI certificates."

More Venafi pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in documentation. The documentation could be more specific about the changes needed to achieve specific goals."

"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."

"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."

"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."

"At the moment CyberArk needs to enrich Conjur and it needs to be made more viable so that its adoption can be made much faster."

"The product is not cheap, especially if you opt for an on-premise deployment requiring a complex server infrastructure. On the other hand, choosing the software as a service version simplifies infrastructure requirements but necessitates being online all the time."

"More integrations would be better."

"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"We have not faced any kind of disadvantage regarding Venafi, but they could improve on the bugs, as sometimes the system gets stuck."

"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."

"Currently, specific processes require manual installations due to the lack of built-in integrations."

"Currently lacks the capability to automatically download certificates in JKS."

"I would like to see included in the next release of Venafi integration with the cloud HSM's, Hardware Security Module. Additionally, I would say other cloud services, because it's not only cloud that's essential. If you have a customer that has a lot of their IT moved into cloud, integration with different cloud services is always an area to improve."

"I would give it a seven out of ten for stability because I reported a bug after an update. We faced one issue. Overall, stability is good, though there are some bugs and crashes."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns."

"There are quite a few different technical aspects of Venafi that I feel they just missed out on; I'd have to look at my notes for the specifics."

More Venafi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"I feel that it's fairly priced compared to other solutions we evaluated, such as IBM, SailPoint, and KiteServer. It is fairly priced and offers good value."

"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."

"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

Some areas experience slowness based on the workload. There's a need to enhance network performance despite the good user experience with access management.

See all answers

What do you like most about Venafi?

We use Venafi for PKI certificates.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?

I was the member who decided it, so I'm aware of the pricing. I feel that it's fairly priced compared to other solutions we evaluated, such as IBM, SailPoint, and KiteServer. It is fairly priced an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Venafi?

We have not faced any kind of disadvantage regarding Venafi, but they could improve on the bugs, as sometimes the system gets stuck.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 12% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 10% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Active Directory vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

AppViewX CERT+ vs Venafi

Compared 41% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Venafi

Compared 31% of the time

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Venafi

Compared 11% of the time

Axiad Conductor vs Venafi

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Venafi

Compared 6% of the time

More Venafi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

June 2025

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

Venafi

May 2025

Download Venafi product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Venafi automates protection for machine identities, which all organizations rely on to keep communications between machines secure and private. Venafi generates the machine identity intelligence necessary to automatically safeguard the flow of information to trusted machines and prevent communication with untrusted ones - all at machine speed and scale.

CyberArk

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. Venafi

June 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. Venafi

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. Venafi and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. Venafi report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.