CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus comparison

CyberArk and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. CyberArk is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6, while WatchGuard is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. CyberArk holds a 1.7% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to WatchGuard’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews

1,264 Views
34 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

Read 5 WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus reviews

220 Views
98 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus are contenders in the cybersecurity domain. CyberArk has an edge in privileges management, while WatchGuard excels in real-time threat detection.

Features: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is valued for its extensive privilege management, application control, and endpoint protection. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus focuses on real-time malware detection, intrusion prevention, and web filtering. CyberArk emphasizes privilege management, whereas WatchGuard prioritizes gateway-level security.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk could improve in simplifying its complex setup process, enhance integrations for smoother operation, and provide more intuitive user interfaces. WatchGuard could benefit from enhanced deep packet inspection, better integration with third-party tools, and more detailed logging capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager requires detailed integration and may seem complex, though it provides strong technical support. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus features a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, offering an advantage for quick implementations.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk involves higher setup costs tied to its advanced features, offering substantial ROI for endpoint security prioritizers. WatchGuard typically incurs lower initial costs, providing notable ROI due to its cost-efficient gateway security solutions. The distinction is marked by CyberArk's higher initial investment versus WatchGuard's economical deployment.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Endpoint Compliance (5th), Privileged Access Management (PAM) (4th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (5th)

WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools

27th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 1.7%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Anti-Malware Tools

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan

Lead Consultant at Aujas Networks Pvt Ltd

Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights

There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.

Read full review

Petri Alhainen

Administrator at Sulbana Oy

Reasonably priced and simple to use

During the product's installation phase, you just put the tool in the right place, and it works. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The solution can be deployed in a couple of minutes. The installation process is so basic that I don't even remember what you need to do. You just put the tick marks in the tool and ask the tool to use them. In the rules, where you see the files go through is where you can think over what to do with the files. With the tool, you just need to put it on, and then the default rules make sure that there is some indication that something is wrong.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."

"Their customer support was excellent."

"We have not had issues with CyberArk. It works very smoothly. We can do many things with CyberArk. It helps us to see exactly what is happening."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances computer security by providing minimal access, effectively preventing ransomware attacks."

"It doesn't affect operational efficiency. If you set everything correctly, the user doesn't notice that it is in the background."

"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."

"This is the number one product for privilege account security."

"The solution's technical support is good."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros

"I haven't a problem with anti-virus stability using WatchGuard for over two years."

"WatchGuard is easy to implement and inexpensive. When we get a bulk-off license, we get a very discounted price that is competitive with alternative or competitor solutions."

"It is the most effective on non-encrypted traffic and it is able to determine some threats through deep packet inspection."

"The pricing of the solution is okay. It's not the most expensive option."

"It does its job very well, and it is quite easy to put to use."

Cons

"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."

"The installation process is pretty difficult."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a perfect solution, but CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager for Linux has many issues. Another area for improvement in CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, specifically for Windows, is that there's no way for you to check credential theft from a text file, such as a notepad file."

"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link."

"The CyberArk team is working on a feature to identify devices without the Endpoint Privilege Manager running, which is currently missing."

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager could be improved by simplifying the administration process, specifically when setting up policies and applications."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons

"There were a little bit of problems with the tool's updates, making it an area where improvements are needed."

"It doesn't offer the best protection and it's incompatible with a lot of China's websites. It makes a lot of mistakes when it is detecting items as it's not recognizing items correctly."

"The solution isn't what I would consider feature-rich."

"WatchGuard technical support requires a license."

"Since WatchGuard acquired Panda, there may be synergies in consolidating both solutions under a single name to reduce customer confusion."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is slightly expensive, but costs can be negotiated to become more competitive."

"It's not at the lower end of the market. I think the price is reasonable considering the quality it delivers. It is a top-notch solution at a fair price point."

"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive."

"I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing to pay this money."

"I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since the price can be too high for smaller businesses."

"licensing for this solution is based on the number of APV (privileged users), and the number of sessions that you want to record."

"The cost for CyberArk is very high."

"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice

"For what we use, the tool's price has been reasonable, but it is not the cheapest. The tool has been quite reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats

This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?

I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus?

It is a basic tool tool, and it does very well for what it is supposed to do. It does simple checks against signatures. I think it is very much what it needs to be, and it is a basic tool that you ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus?

The solution is used when you want to handle policies with the file. There are different ways you can use it, like in the firewall rules and in proxy rules, and to secure emails. The tool was used ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus?

It is the basic starting tool. We used different tools in the company. In our gateway, we used WatchGuard because we used WatchGuard's firewalls. It was very easy to set it up. It was used so that ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 15% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Tanium vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

Compared 6% of the time

More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

Compared 54% of the time

Securepoint Antivirus Pro vs WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

Compared 46% of the time

More WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager

June 2025

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager report

Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Anti-Malware Tools

January 2025

Download WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus product report

Also Known As

Viewfinity

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

Keeping your network free of malware is more challenging than ever before as an increasing number of new and ever-changing threats are emerging each day. Ensure your network and devices remain free of malware with WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus. It uses advanced, multi-layered threat detection engines to identify and block malware at the network gateway. Using industry-leading, high-performance scanning of traffic on all major protocols, WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus provides real-time protection against known viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, and rogueware.

WatchGuard

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Star Cargo

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

June 2025

Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus report.

See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.