CrossBrowserTesting vs SmarteSoft Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SmartBear Logo
1,251 views|940 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SmarteSoft Logo
107 views|84 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and SmarteSoft Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,277 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."
  • "A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."
  • "CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."
  • "It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."
  • "SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."
  • More CrossBrowserTesting Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    28th
    Views
    1,251
    Comparisons
    940
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    42nd
    Views
    107
    Comparisons
    84
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    772,277 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    SmarteSoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

    • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
    • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.
    SmarteSoft Testing Suite brings a highly extensible integrated quality assurance platform to complement team's quality and productivity efforts, driving improvements in project efficiency, end-user experience and business outcomes. SmarteSoft's patented script-less testing technologies reduce time for test case scripting, testing cycles and let you increase both QA/ALM and production efficiencies. Testing Suites include the following: Functional Testing, Performance Testing, Validation Testing, Regression Testing, ALM & Healthcare.
    Sample Customers
    St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
    Humanitarian Aid Organization, Columbian Financial Group (CFG), Proxibid, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    University7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Government10%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business35%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise60%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2024.
    772,277 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CrossBrowserTesting is ranked 28th in Functional Testing Tools while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is ranked 42nd in Functional Testing Tools. CrossBrowserTesting is rated 9.0, while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CrossBrowserTesting writes "Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems". On the other hand, CrossBrowserTesting is most compared with BrowserStack, Bitbar, Tricentis Tosca, LambdaTest and Sauce Labs, whereas SmarteSoft Testing Suite is most compared with .

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.