CrossBrowserTesting vs SmarteSoft Testing Suite comparison

CrossBrowserTesting
Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews
  • 1,103 Views
  • 832 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
SmarteSoft Testing Suite
  • 106 Views
  • 85 Comparison Views
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and SmarteSoft Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: June 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
June 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 793,295 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
28th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SmarteSoft Testing Suite
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Performance Testing Tools (25th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 0.6%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmarteSoft Testing Suite is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Michael Hutchison - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 7, 2020
Static screenshots are the feature most often used, because they are a simple method of detecting problems
When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a variety of browsers and devices. CBT works with our testing environment and development site.  Our greatest concern is universal appearance and functionality, thus we test a great many…
Read full review
Use SmarteSoft Testing Suite?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."
"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."
"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."
"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."
"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Government
7%
Media Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 59% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 20% of the time
Bitbar vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
Bitbar vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 13% of the time
Automai AppVerify vs CrossBrowserTesting Logo
Automai AppVerify vs CrossBrowserTesting
Compared 8% of the time
More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors
No data available
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CrossBrowserTesting
July 2024
CrossBrowserTesting reportDownload CrossBrowserTesting product report
Buyer's Guide
Performance Testing Tools
July 2024
SmarteSoft Testing Suite reportDownload SmarteSoft Testing Suite product report
 

Learn More

SmartBear
Video not available
SmarteSoft
 

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

  • Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
  • Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.
SmarteSoft Testing Suite brings a highly extensible integrated quality assurance platform to complement team's quality and productivity efforts, driving improvements in project efficiency, end-user experience and business outcomes. SmarteSoft's patented script-less testing technologies reduce time for test case scripting, testing cycles and let you increase both QA/ALM and production efficiencies. Testing Suites include the following: Functional Testing, Performance Testing, Validation Testing, Regression Testing, ALM & Healthcare.
 

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
Humanitarian Aid Organization, Columbian Financial Group (CFG), Proxibid, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
June 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: June 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.