CRITICALSTART vs Netsurion comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Critical Start and Netsurion are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Critical Start is ranked #29, while Netsurion is ranked #31. Critical Start holds a 1.4% mindshare in MDR, compared to Netsurion’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Critical Start users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Netsurion users who would recommend it.

CRITICALSTART

Read 10 CRITICALSTART reviews

3,419 Views
2,393 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Netsurion

Read 24 Netsurion reviews

6,639 Views
2,124 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

CRITICALSTART

Netsurion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 8, 2026

CRITICALSTART and Netsurion are both in the cybersecurity solutions category, focusing on threat detection and response. CRITICALSTART leads in user satisfaction with customizable security operations, while Netsurion offers a cost-effective, comprehensive security framework suitable for enterprise needs.

Features: CRITICALSTART provides automated threat detection, response mechanisms, and a robust analytics platform. Netsurion offers a managed threat protection platform, adaptive threat intelligence, and integrated compliance reports, catering well to enterprise-scale demands.

Room for Improvement: CRITICALSTART could enhance its integration capabilities and reduce response time delay issues. Netsurion may improve by expanding its feature set, reducing noise in alerts, and providing more intuitive user interfaces.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CRITICALSTART is recognized for its intuitive deployment and proactive support. Netsurion ensures smooth deployment with hands-on assistance and operational guidance, receiving praise for its tailored customer service.

Pricing and ROI: CRITICALSTART requires a considerable upfront investment reflected in dynamic operations enhancements and substantial ROI. Netsurion offers competitive pricing with scalable deployment and strong ROI, emphasizing the cost benefits for enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed CRITICALSTART vs. Netsurion Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART vs. Netsurion

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CRITICALSTART

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

29th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (24th)

Netsurion

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

31st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (50th), SOC as a Service (9th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (46th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of CRITICALSTART is 1.4%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netsurion is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CRITICALSTART	1.4%
Netsurion	1.2%
Other	97.4%

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Justin Hadley

Sr. Manager, Security Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

The transparency of data in the platform is perfect: You see everything as they are seeing it

Their Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) engine, which is kind of their correlation engine, is by far and away one of the best in the business. We can filter and utilize different lists to build out different alerts, such as, what to alert on and when not to alert. This engine helps reduce our number of alerts and false positives. The service's Trusted Behavior Registry helps the provider solve every alert. The way that they have it built out is very intelligent. The way every alert comes in, it gets triaged one direction or another. If it is already a false positive, then it is still getting addressed and reviewed on a regular cadence. Also, true positive alerts get escalated to the appropriate personnel. Its mobile app is great. The ability just to be able to quick reference and see what's coming in when you're on the move or go. You don't always need to have your computer or laptop handy, because you can operate it just from the mobile app. It can communicate with analysts, which is great. The mobile app is great at affecting the efficiency of our security operations. Those guys are using it throughout the day, whether that be at the office, home, or off hours. Typically, they triage from the mobile app. Then, if an escalation needs to be done on a computer, they will pull out a computer. We were on the original UI for a few years, so the updated UI has been a refreshing change. It has significantly more ability to filter and translate data, then load that data. It is rather intuitive to click through for some of our junior analysts or interns, especially as we are starting to onboard and teach them different aspects of the security operations team.

Read full review

John-Berry

Information Technology Manager at ProfitSolv

The SOC center monitors, hunts, and notifies us of threats around the clock

I know they are working to resolve this issue, but Netsurion is currently unable to retrieve logs from S3 buckets. We use WP Engine for a lot of web hosting as well as AWS, and both of these platforms use S3 buckets. I would like Netsurion to be able to pull logs from Linux devices. We have some of that capability, and I believe they can do it. However, the way it works with Amazon is strange and glitchy. Therefore, working something out with Amazon would be great. Netsurion's SOC can be a bit too aggressive at times. We have asked them to adjust their playbook because I am tired of being notified about the same issue multiple times a day. I am aware of the issue, and it is not a cause for concern. Let's only take action on this issue if we see an actual problem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"From where we were prior to going into them, the service has increased our analysts’ efficiency to the point that they can focus on other areas of the business. It gives me the ability to allow analysts to do Level 3 and 4 work and stay out of the weeds of the alerts, where you tend to get alert fatigue. The service takes care of much of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 triage. It is more effective than what we had been used to, because it allows the filtering of Level 1 and Level 2 type alerts to be taken care of. This leaves less for us to handle, which is a good thing."

"When I start thinking about if I were to try to light up a SOC, which I've done before and I have no interest in doing, it could be a million dollars a year or more to do that, and for what I am paying them for the managed fees, it's a steal."

"The new mobile app is awesome. It is one of the best I've ever seen. It's much better than its predecessor. It's more intuitive, a whole lot easier to navigate and get where you need to go. It's less repetitive and just generally easier to use. It allows me to not have to be sitting at my computer all the time. I can be on my phone or tablet or wherever I'm at. It makes it a lot easier to answer tickets and do that kind of thing."

"There are two parts of CRITICALSTART's services that are most valuable to us. The MDR solution where they monitor our computers, laptops, and users across the board; and their knowledge of Palo Alto firewalls."

"From where we were prior to going into them, the service has increased our analysts’ efficiency to the point that they can focus on other areas of the business."

"There is a team of people who monitor our traffic and processes 24/7, so if anything raises a flag or alert, it will escalate back to me right away. That's the most incredible part: Humans working behind the scenes 24/7 to monitor our networks."

"It is a comfort to know that there is a team of professionals backing you up, especially in an area that you don't feel 100 percent comfortable."

"This has been a positive experience and money well spent."

More CRITICALSTART pros

"The solution provides actionable threat intelligence, it is not a passive service, they go in and perform mitigations on whatever they find, it is timely, and they provide context so it is understood by anyone who receives these reports."

"Of all the products and vendors that we've used, I've never had a more positive experience with a support team than with EventTracker's support team."

"The network alert is the most valuable feature. That way, we in the IT department are aware of user lockout and invalid password attempts way before a user ever even calls in."

"I like the UI, overall. I like the main page and there are aspects of the search page that I like. When you bring it up on the left-hand side of the page, as you look at the events, the ability to simply hit and click the plus/minus to pull events in and out of the overall view is well done and is very effective from a threat-hunting and an analysis perspective. I like the detail it shows."

"Netsurion's security operations center is critical for us because they provide 24/7 monitoring, we've never had another company meet the same need in the past, and it's a valuable tool to have."

"I like EventTracker's dashboard. I see it every time I log in because it's the first thing you get to. We have our own widgets that we use. For the sake of transparency, there are a few widgets that we look at there and then we move out from there... Among the particularly helpful widgets, the not-reporting widget is a big one. The number-of-logs-processed is also a good one."

"The most valuable feature is definitely real-time alerting, especially in situations where someone might attempt to exploit or hack into our network."

"We don't have the eyeballs available to stare and watch for things, or even have the capability of building internal alert systems. So, the managed SOC has been huge for freeing up staff to work on other responsibilities. We are saving on at least one full-time employee."

More Netsurion pros

Cons

"The biggest room for improvement is not necessarily in their service or offering, but in the products that they support."

"They could dig a little bit deeper into the Splunk alerts when they feel like they need to be escalated to us. For example, if a locked account shows up, they could do a little extra digging to verify that the locked account was due to a bad password on the local system. They could just do a little extra digging within the Splunk environment instead of pushing it onto us to go do that extra little digging."

"The only thing I can think of that I would like to see, and I'm sure they could work this into a service pretty easily, is not only alerts on issues that are affecting my company, but some threat intelligence of a general nature on what's out there in the environment. That might be a nice add-in."

"There is room for improvement with the new UI, and that's about it. I would like to see a more intuitive design."

"In terms of responsiveness, when I open up an alert, sometimes it takes a bit of time to load. However, it only happened once or twice."

"It has frustrated us that they don't have a native Slack integration, because most things do now. That's something we've asked for, for years, and it just doesn't really seem like it's a priority."

"It costs a lot for what we felt comfortable to spend."

"The updated UI is actually pretty bad. Regarding the intuitiveness, it is fairly easy to use, but the responsiveness, on a scale of one to 10, is a one. It's really poor performance."

More CRITICALSTART cons

"Probably the biggest thing is just: Can I search for this and what's the best way to do it? If I'm looking for two events versus a singular event, I just throw it back at them. They're the experts on it."

"The upfront costs have increased, and we have been locked into this contract."

"The hosted on-premise hardware that we were using was having issues. The performance of it was horrendous, but we weren't using it."

"They have their programs and tools that you have to put into your own environment. We basically ingest all the log data and then push it out to them. I wish it was a little bit different than that where we just push directly towards them. I do not know if that is a function that they thought would be better in terms of security, but I wish that instead of doing that, it should go from the device to them and not from the device to another system and then out to them. There seem to be some drawbacks to doing that."

"I'd like to see improvement in the ease of generating reports. It seems fairly cumbersome whenever you decide to start tracking new categories of events. It seems a little kludgy when trying to generate those reports."

"There are some issues with searches taking a long period of time, but they assured me that they have implemented a new search function that's available in version 9, but which requires a solid-state hard drive... Depending on how many logs you have it could take a long time to return the results if you're looking back prior to the last 30 days."

"Their SOC team can't understand our network because they haven't worked in the actual company. This does negatively affect security posture, e.g., if you don't have knowledge about the network, then you will miss things."

"The solution's dashboard is okay. The one thing that we ran into are issues when we upgraded to the newer version. It uses Elasticsearch for the different dashboard entries. So, we were running on spinning disks, and Elasticsearch didn't work that well. A number of the different dashboards, like my dashboard or different things like that, pull from Elasticsearch. Since Elasticsearch really wasn't working, we were having some issues with that, but we just migrated."

More Netsurion cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It costs a lot for what we felt comfortable to spend."

"There are contractual penalties if their SLAs are not met. This commitment was very important in our decision to go with this service, because not having downtime is extremely important to us. The providers has not missed an SLA in the 18 months that I have worked with them."

"Overall, for what I'm paying for it, and the benefit I'm getting out of it, it is right where it needs to be, if not a little bit in my favor. For what it costs me to actually have this service, I could afford one internal person to do that job, but now I have a team of 10 or more who are doing that job, and they don't sleep because they work shifts."

"As far as the expense goes, it's very competitive pricing and the services you get are almost like you have a person on your team."

"The pricing has always been competitive. They have always been good to us. They will make it a fight. They don't try to hide anything; it's always been fully transparent and well-worth what we pay for it."

"The pricing of other services was so insane that they weren't even an option."

"I've told CRITICALSTART that I think the managed service they provide is cheaper than it should be. It's a really good deal."

"Netsurion's pricing is extremely fair and flexible. The price of their SIEM product is reasonable, and you can pay for those services you want on top of that. It wasn't cheap, but it's competitive, and we intend to renew our contract."

"Our budget follows the calendar year. We just started a new budget year at the beginning of the month. We did budget for an increase in our threat management system selection. Therefore, we have the budget to implement and accommodate a threat management system change, including an increase for the quoted actions that we received to improve EventTracker. We are just waiting on our council to approve that budget, which might not be for a little while. Hopefully, when they do, we will be able to jump on doing something."

"I don't know if the pricing is by the seat but we're paying about $20,000 to 25,000 a year. On top of that, we pay for the managed support services. That runs us about another $35,000 or $40,000 a year."

"The upfront costs have increased, and we have been locked into this contract. The cost of changing over from it is way too high."

"Our pricing for Netsurion last year was US $52,000 per year."

"In the security space, it's hard to quantify your return on investment. So, I don't. We spend about $40,000 a year and so. It's hard to say if the SIEM saved that much money."

"We have seen time and cost savings. It prevents us from having to hire specialized people for this type of work. We would need to hire six staff members to accommodate the same service."

"It is a bit expensive as compared to some of the other products that have come out in recent years. Expense-wise, the only downside is that it is not cheap."

More Netsurion pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

19%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	7

Comparisons

Binary Defense MDR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 11% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 9% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 7% of the time

Expel vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 5% of the time

More CRITICALSTART Competitors

GoSecure Titan Platform vs Netsurion

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Netsurion

Compared 7% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs Netsurion

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Netsurion

Compared 6% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Netsurion

Compared 4% of the time

More Netsurion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART

November 2026

Download CRITICALSTART product report

Buyer's Guide

Netsurion

October 2026

Download Netsurion product report

Also Known As

Critical Start, CriticalStart

Netsurion Managed Threat Protection, Netsurion EventTracker

Overview

CRITICALSTART enhances cybersecurity through advanced alert management, expert guidance, and a user-friendly interface. It promotes efficient monitoring and response to alerts, utilizing a Zero Trust model for heightened security.

CRITICALSTART is designed for organizations seeking to manage security alerts and streamline monitoring processes. Known for its quick response times and efficient alert filtering, it integrates tools like Cylance and Carbon Black to offer managed detection and response services. Users experience enhanced security by focusing on critical threats while the platform's easy navigation aids in efficiently responding to alerts. Improvement areas include better alert prioritization, enhanced compliance disclosure, and smoother integration with third-party communication tools.

What are the key features of CRITICALSTART?

Alert Management: Efficient handling and filtering of alerts to minimize noise.
Expert Guidance: Insights for integrating SIEM and optimizing response strategies.
Mobile Access: Easy access through a mobile app to manage alerts on the go.
Zero Trust Model: Enhances security by minimizing unnecessary access and noise.
User-Friendly Interface: Seamless navigation enhances user interaction and response times.

What advantages and ROI should users consider?

Improved Security Confidence: Advanced alert handling promotes a secure environment.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlined monitoring allows focus on critical threats.
Expert Insight: Professional guidance enhances security strategies and operations.
Quick Response Times: Rapid handling of threats reduces potential impacts.

In industry applications, organizations use CRITICALSTART to bolster cybersecurity measures across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. Managed detection services and third-party integration make it suitable for enterprises looking to optimize security operations and minimize alert fatigue while ensuring 24/7 monitoring and protection.

Critical Start

Netsurion offers real-time alerts, weekly reports, and a user-friendly interface, facilitating security event visibility and threat detection. Its capabilities include seamless platform integration, quick setup, 24/7 SOC monitoring, and fast data retrieval via Elasticsearch.

Netsurion enhances IT security by providing centralized log management, abnormal activity alerts, and compliance reports. Users often employ it for VPN monitoring, firewall scrutiny, and vulnerability assessment. The system's frequent updates ensure effective cybersecurity management, while its managed SOC service supports ongoing threat monitoring and response. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in interface simplicity, report generation speed, and search functionalities.

What are Netsurion's key features?

Real-Time Alerts: Instant notifications for security incidents and activities.
Weekly Reports: Regular updates on security events and system performance.
User-Friendly Interface: Easy navigation and setup for fast implementation.
24/7 SOC Monitoring: Around-the-clock security operations center support.
Elasticsearch: Quick data retrieval and processing for efficient analysis.

What benefits should users look for?

Streamlined Threat Detection: Efficiently identifies and responds to threats.
Enhanced Data Retrieval: Faster access to logs and security data.
Improved Compliance Management: Meets regulatory requirements with ease.
Seamless Platform Integration: Easy connection with multiple platforms.
Insight into Network Activities: Provides detailed analysis of network behavior.

Netsurion is implemented across diverse industries to provide comprehensive security monitoring and compliance management. Companies use it to gather and analyze log data, manage firewall activities, assess vulnerabilities, and facilitate event logging. This aids in enhancing security posture and ensuring compliance with industry standards.

Netsurion

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Salvation Army, The FRESH Market, Pacific Western Bank, NASA, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), and Talbot’s Stores

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART vs. Netsurion

September 2026

Free Report: CRITICALSTART vs. Netsurion

Find out what your peers are saying about CRITICALSTART vs. Netsurion and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CRITICALSTART vs. Netsurion report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.