CoreOS Clair vs Tufin Orchestration Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Red Hat Logo
714 views|568 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tufin Logo
248 views|158 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CoreOS Clair and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Container Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy."

More CoreOS Clair Pros →

"We use Tufin to clean up our firewall policies. This makes it a lot easier to find out the things that are wrong.""The solution is good, and no clients complained about it.""The reporting on offer is very good. Tufin makes nice reports.""The stability is bulletproof.""Tufin is the only multi-vendor firewall tool that is available, and it helps to bring everything together and report on what all of the rules are.""The Automatic Policy Generator saves time because we are able to identify the required policy when a client doesn't know what he needs.""I like the deployment and management of this solution.""They have very good responses regarding integration and internalization with open tickets."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pros →

Cons
"An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects."

More CoreOS Clair Cons →

"At least in our environment, the dynamic learning of the topology needs improvement.""I would like to see improved role-based access.""I think that the interface could be cleaner, and easier to use.""There are some missing features we'd like to see them add in the future.""In the next release I would like to see better migration in the Cloud because that will allow more visibility in the network.""It does not natively support all of the Check Point functions which is a big deal.""A big improvement would be on the USP policy. If we could use Palo Alto to take those zone names and auto import them into the policy, then just do the policy based on the zone names instead of having to put in every single subnet.""I would like a better reporting feature and automatic alerting based upon rule changes."

More Tufin Orchestration Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge."
  • More CoreOS Clair Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. We used to spend up to an hour to do a change, and now, it's around five minutes."
  • "Tufin and AlgoSec were pretty much in the competitive price range, but this one provided us better integration into the Check Point environment."
  • "The solution has helped us to reduce the time it takes to make changes. With Tufin, it takes ten to 15 minutes. Before, it was 30 minutes or more."
  • "The solution has helped reduce the time it takes us to make changes. It helps make overall integrated changes immediately. It allows us to cut down at least a few hours in the week in regards to changes and monitoring."
  • "We've seen a decrease of about 50 percent in the overall time it takes to complete a firewall change."
  • "Tufin makes things a little easier. It lessens the amount of manual work which we have to do. It has a lot of benefits in terms of revenues, profits, employee costs, and operational costs. We have already seen return on investment."
  • "This solution helps us reduce the time it takes us to make changes. We're probably saving time by 25%."
  • "Tufin reduced the time it takes to solve a problem, which reduces the time of the outage."
  • More Tufin Orchestration Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:CoreOS Clair's best feature is detection accuracy.
    Top Answer:CoreOS Clair is open-source and free of charge.
    Top Answer:An area for improvement is that CoreOS Clair doesn't provide information about the location of vulnerabilities it detects. They should disclose these details immediately in a public database.
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Tufin is security auditing. We are able to check the rules and compliance of the company, for example, what is allowed or not. We are able to check the rules over… more »
    Top Answer:Tuffin is expensive, and we have to explain to our customers the benefit for them to purchase. If we explain the benefits in the correct way they do not mind the price. We typically do costing for the… more »
    Top Answer:The reporting function could improve in Tufin. For our clients with companies that have strong compliance, reporting privacy data is mostly a problem. In the IT department, private data needs a… more »
    Ranking
    27th
    out of 60 in Container Security
    Views
    714
    Comparisons
    568
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    238
    Rating
    8.0
    23rd
    out of 60 in Container Security
    Views
    248
    Comparisons
    158
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    432
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tufin SecureCloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Clair is an open source project for the static analysis of vulnerabilities in appc and docker containers.

    Vulnerability data is continuously imported from a known set of sources and correlated with the indexed contents of container images in order to produce lists of vulnerabilities that threaten a container. When vulnerability data changes upstream, the previous state and new state of the vulnerability along with the images they affect can be sent via webhook to a configured endpoint. All major components can be customized programmatically at compile-time without forking the project.

    Tufin enables organizations to automate their security policy visibility, risk management, provisioning and compliance across their multi-vendor, hybrid environment. Customers gain visibility and control across their network, ensure continuous compliance with security standards and embed security enforcement into workflows and development pipelines. 

    Sample Customers
    eBay, Veritas, Verizon, SalesForce
    3M, AT&T, Blue Cross Blue Shield, BNP Parabas, ConocoPhillips, Deutsche Bank, GE, IBM, Pfizer, United States Postal Service 
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Container Security
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Microsoft and others in Container Security. Updated: April 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CoreOS Clair is ranked 27th in Container Security with 1 review while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 23rd in Container Security with 180 reviews. CoreOS Clair is rated 8.0, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CoreOS Clair writes "Excellent detection accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". CoreOS Clair is most compared with Snyk, Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes, JFrog Xray, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Aqua Cloud Security Platform, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and ManageEngine Firewall Analyzer.

    See our list of best Container Security vendors.

    We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.