Coralogix vs OpenText SiteScope comparison

Coralogix and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0. Coralogix holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,838 Views
1,589 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Read 28 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,582 Views
1,345 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Coralogix

OpenText SiteScope

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Coralogix are well-regarded monitoring solutions. Coralogix holds an edge in overall satisfaction due to advanced features, whereas OpenText SiteScope excels in pricing and support.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope offers comprehensive monitoring capabilities, ease of integration with other systems, and robust pricing options. Coralogix provides real-time analytics, sophisticated alerting mechanisms, and advanced data analytics capabilities.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope needs better performance, a more modern design, and enhanced support documentation. Coralogix requires better documentation, improved customer support, and more robust integration solutions.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope is noted for its straightforward deployment and reliable customer service. Coralogix offers seamless deployment and a user-friendly approach but lags behind in customer service.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Coralogix?

OpenText SiteScope is favored for competitive pricing and substantial ROI. Coralogix, though more costly, offers powerful features deemed worth the price. OpenText SiteScope stands out for its affordability, while Coralogix justifies its cost through advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Log Management (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), API Management (15th), Streaming Analytics (14th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText SiteScope	0.6%
Coralogix	1.1%
Other	98.3%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts

There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

"There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."

"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."

"The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence."

"Our experiences with Micro Focus SiteScope have been mostly positive as we can easily work with multiple monitors and different types of monitors pretty quickly. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions for us through Micro Focus SiteScope, so we don't have to do that much custom coding for the vast majority of requests that we get for monitoring. There are some limitations that we've run into and some problems every once in a while, but they've been relatively minor."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText SiteScope is that it is easy to manage and user-friendly."

"The URL monitoring is excellent."

"It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."

"The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

Cons

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

More Coralogix cons

"Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."

"The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability."

"The graphs and dashboard in the solution are areas that need improvement."

"Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope could improve by adding more features, such as cloud, APM, and DevOps monitoring."

"The lack of an agent means that remote monitoring requires multiple firewall ports to be opened."

"More out of the box Cloud integration and capabilities."

"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."

"While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The new version D2 has improved with a smart plan UI interface. However, while still using the classic WebTop UI, it looks outdated and not HTML5 compatible. They are currently in progress to migra...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 23% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Logz.io vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 24% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 16% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 15% of the time

ManageEngine Applications Manager vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

October 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

September 2025

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope

September 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. OpenText SiteScope report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.