


Control-M and Stonebranch both compete in the field of data pipeline orchestration. Based on user feedback, Stonebranch appears to have the upper hand in terms of integration support and task self-management, while Control-M is praised for its comprehensive offerings and support.
Features: Control-M provides extensive customization options and rich integrations, especially for Python and cloud services. Users find its automation API useful for integrating various scripts and applications. Stonebranch is valued for its task monitoring capabilities, providing user autonomy and supporting diverse technology integrations and platforms.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve its multi-cloud connectivity and enhance auditing capabilities. Users also desire more streamlined documentation and better integration methods. Stonebranch could simplify task scheduling and offer more advanced integration techniques, particularly for cloud interactions. Users also wish for enhanced mobile app capabilities and easier configuration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M offers deployment across multiple environments but requires sophisticated configuration; users appreciate its technical support despite occasional slow response times. Stonebranch is noted for smoother deployment, competitive licensing, and responsive support, praised for its user-friendly design.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M's pricing is considered high but justified by its feature set and support, delivering significant ROI through efficient automation. Stonebranch is viewed as more cost-effective, offering a lower initial cost while maintaining robust features, yielding satisfactory ROI, particularly for those seeking budget-friendly orchestration solutions.
The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
We plan to migrate all the different work scheduling tools to Stonebranch, so I think we will have a single centralized license that will save a lot of cost to the company.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
The service executive was very prompt in providing a solution.
We received very good training given by Stonebranch staff, including operator training and administration training.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Stonebranch is a very scalable application, and we can use it on various integrations and applications.
Stonebranch's scalability is very good.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Stonebranch is very stable, and there are no bugs or glitches.
We have a huge workload across multiple regions and we are running on the same UAC.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
We can add various other features such as AI to improve its accessibility because in today's world, AI is more important than manual things.
Creating a task or job and then creating a schedule with time triggers and other triggers in different objects feels a bit complicated compared to other tools in the market where everything is laid out in a single pane and scheduling is easy.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Stonebranch has been that it is a very affordable tool.
From an organizational cost perspective with Stonebranch, it is a bit cheaper than other tools available in the market.
JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
Stonebranch helps in reducing the times and the errors, and as a team, we can coordinate very smoothly with each other because the runtime is very fast, ensuring that each and every member is having similar experiences without any bugs.
Reporting helps us observe the trend of how much the script has executed in the past and what sort of load is expected in the future based on that analysis.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 15.2% |
| JAMS | 2.6% |
| Stonebranch | 4.4% |
| Other | 77.8% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 8 |
| Large Enterprise | 18 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 137 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.
Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.
What are JAMS's key features?In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
Stonebranch specializes in enterprise automation, excelling in workload scheduling and batch processing across platforms like Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries. This platform offers robust automation, enhancing operational efficiency and supporting digital transformation.
Stonebranch's platform-agnostic capabilities allow organizations to manage and integrate workloads seamlessly. Its Universal Controller is central to task management, offering a web-based interface for flexibility. Users appreciate its stability, with reliable agents facilitating workflow creation without specialized skills. Efficient file transfers and scheduling tools minimize maintenance, supporting diverse tech environments. Though Stonebranch is beneficial, users look for improvements in graphical workflow visibility, finalized API functionalities, and enhanced connectivity with tools like Microsoft SRS. Enhancements in training materials and cloud availability are also desired.
What are the key features of Stonebranch?Stonebranch finds applications in sectors requiring enterprise automation. Organizations leveraging Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries utilize it for workflow automation, file management, and integrating distributed workloads. It supports tasks like data extraction and analytics, managing thousands of daily operations to enhance visibility and minimize manual interventions.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.