Control-M vs Stonebranch comparison

BMC and Stonebranch are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while Stonebranch is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC holds a 16.3% mindshare in WA, compared to Stonebranch’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Stonebranch users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

We performed a comparison between Control-M and Stonebranch Universal Automation Center based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

Features: Control-M offers a range of valuable capabilities such as Managed File Transfer, credentials vault, integration capabilities, Role-Based Administration, file transfer integration, collaboration, scheduling, ease of configuration, web interface, reporting, workload archiving, and forecasting. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is commended for its strong performance, graphical representation, intuitive interface, job dependencies, rerun function, GUI, task monitor, stability, scalability, and reliable technical support.

Control-M could improve its microservices and API integration, fix bugs in the web interface, develop a lighter web version, enhance reporting capabilities, and improve support and documentation. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center could benefit from cloud availability, improved analytics, easier task monitoring, and a mobile app for job hour calculation. Collaborating with the vendor for future releases would also be helpful.

Service and Support: Control-M's customer service has received mixed feedback, with some customers commending the prompt and knowledgeable support team. However, others believe there is room for improvement. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center's customer service has garnered high praise. Users describe support as very good and always available to help.

Ease of Deployment: Control-M's initial setup was simple and aided by useful guides and videos. Upgrades were seamless and caused minimal disruption. While customization and migration posed some challenges, Control-M proved adaptable and offered assistance. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center's setup was rated as mediocre in terms of ease. The infrastructure's complexity led to complications and necessitated the relocation of certain components.

Pricing: The opinions on setup cost for Control-M vary, with some users expressing concern about the expense associated with hardware and licensing for each job. Stonebranch Universal Automation Center is seen as a more cost-effective option compared to its competitors, leading to its popularity among companies.

ROI: Control-M has proven to be more cost-effective than Stonebranch Universal Automation Center, resulting in improved productivity, decreased downtime, and streamlined processes.

Comparison Results: Control-M is highly preferred over Stonebranch Universal Automation Center. Users appreciate Control-M for its user-friendly setup process, stability, easy maintenance, and smooth upgrades. They find its Managed File Transfer, credentials vault, integration capabilities, role-based administration, and dashboard collaboration features to be valuable.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. Stonebranch Report (Updated: November 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. Stonebranch

November 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,371 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.3

JAMS automates job management, reducing costs and labor while enhancing efficiency and allowing staff to focus on critical tasks.

Sentiment score

6.5

Control-M enhances efficiency by automating tasks, reducing costs, and improving resource allocation, particularly in large enterprises.

Sentiment score

1.0

Organizations find Stonebranch cost-effective and reliable, offering cost savings despite being viewed primarily as an expense.

The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.

reviewer1929963

Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.

reviewer1207266

Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Stonebranch report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.4

JAMS offers impressive, knowledgeable support with quick, effective solutions, proactively addressing user needs through various channels.

Sentiment score

7.2

Control-M support is highly rated for expertise and resources, despite occasional delays and repetitive inquiries, with overall satisfaction.

Sentiment score

8.6

Stonebranch customer service is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and quick resolutions, though some seek improved critical incident response times.

Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.

Papisetty Manikanta

ETL Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.

reviewer2746302

architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.

reviewer2336493

Solutions Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

The service executive was very prompt in providing a solution.

Shubham Marya

Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Stonebranch report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

JAMS efficiently scales to handle thousands of jobs daily, offering flexibility, ease, and consistent performance, though licensing may limit scalability.

Sentiment score

7.5

Control-M excels in scalability, flexibility, and adaptability, efficiently managing millions of jobs daily across various applications.

Sentiment score

8.6

Stonebranch scales effectively, efficiently managing large tasks and environments, though there's room for improvement in node expansion and controller capabilities.

We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.

reviewer2752227

Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.

Iain Airlie

Senior Control-M Consultant at Ktsl

It can absorb more workload wherever needed.

reviewer2587689

Cloud/Devops Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Stonebranch is a very scalable application, and we can use it on various integrations and applications.

Shubham Marya

Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Stonebranch report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

JAMS is stable and reliable, with the desktop version praised, while rare issues are due to external factors.

Sentiment score

7.7

Control-M is praised for its stability and reliability, with issues typically arising from external factors, not the software itself.

Sentiment score

8.5

Stonebranch is praised for stability, quick issue resolution, and high-availability features, with minimal disruptions even during maintenance.

We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.

reviewer2775462

Technical architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The downtime is higher compared to AWS.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.

reviewer2518842

Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Stonebranch is very stable, and there are no bugs or glitches.

Shubham Marya

Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Stonebranch report

Room For Improvement

JAMS users seek enhanced UI, search, automation, security, AI integration, and documentation to improve functionality and performance.

Control-M users seek improved reporting, integration, scalability, flexibility, cost-effectiveness, user interfaces, dashboards, and simplified setup and support.

Stonebranch needs enhanced UI, task management, mainframe integration, and better training, with improved features and analytics in Universal Automation Center.

Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.

Papisetty Manikanta

ETL Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.

Sham Suresh

Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering

We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.

reviewer2752227

Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.

Vishal Leekha

Sr Manager at Vodafone

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

We can add various other features such as AI to improve its accessibility because in today's world, AI is more important than manual things.

Shubham Marya

Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Stonebranch report

Setup Cost

JAMS offers competitive pricing for enterprise scheduling, with flexibility in licensing and lower costs than Control-M and Tivoli.

Control-M's high cost and complex pricing make it more suitable for larger organizations, despite its robust features.

Stonebranch offers cost-effective pricing, unlimited features, and included support, making it cheaper than competitors like Automic and Control-M.

The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.

reviewer2518842

Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.

Mark_Francome

Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.

reviewer2752227

Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Stonebranch has been that it is a very affordable tool.

Shubham Marya

Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Stonebranch report

Valuable Features

JAMS offers automation, intuitive scheduling, and integration, enhancing efficiency with flexible workflows, PowerShell support, and responsive user assistance.

Control-M enhances workflow management with cross-platform automation, cloud integration, real-time monitoring, and user-friendly features for diverse industries.

Stonebranch provides platform-neutral task automation, robust workflow management, and customizable scheduling, enhancing visibility and efficiency in diverse environments.

JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.

reviewer2746302

architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Stonebranch helps in reducing the times and the errors, and as a team, we can coordinate very smoothly with each other because the runtime is very fast, ensuring that each and every member is having similar experiences without any bugs.

Shubham Marya

Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Stonebranch report

Categories and Ranking

JAMS

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of JAMS is 2.3%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 16.3%, down from 26.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Stonebranch is 4.4%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Control-M	16.3%
JAMS	2.3%
Stonebranch	4.4%
Other	77.0%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Support has been among the most helpful and knowledgeable we've ever worked with but performance monitoring needs improvement

The monitoring of the JAMS product and its performance is an area of concern for me. I also need better tools to adopt version seven. Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me. JAMS has some quirks. It has a bit of a learning curve. Some exceptions are not intuitive, such as when a job is terminated due to exceeding its defined runaway time limit. This generates a misleading exception message that is difficult for new users to understand and requires experience to interpret correctly. Stalled jobs present a unique challenge, particularly when pushing a system like JAMS version six to its limits. While rare, these instances occur when jobs become unresponsive despite appearing in API queries but not in the monitoring console. Although workarounds exist, they highlight the need for improved native monitoring capabilities within JAMS. Currently, the system assumes flawless operation, necessitating supplemental monitoring tools to detect issues like excessive pending or stalled jobs, ensuring timely intervention by our teams.

Read full review

Raj Pattni

Batch Admin at NBC Universal

Brings data together from multiple platforms and optimizes cross-environment orchestration

The features of Control-M that I like the most include the ability to easily integrate or bring in different platforms into Control-M. For instance, AWS, mainframe, TWS, and something that's running on Autosys can all be brought into Control-M, converted to how Control-M runs it, and then the batch can be executed. This centralizes various applications in Control-M, which doesn't just have to handle batch processes, but also other tasks like reporting on required data. I find this functionality very useful and the setup is impressive, with more advancements yet to come. With Control-M, my company has achieved several measurable improvements since I started. The metrics indicate that the number of failures has dropped, and we have addressed the issue of excessive false alerts that I encountered when I joined. Previously, we received an overwhelming number of alerts daily, but now we manage to maintain that at a normalized level, perhaps around five to fifteen alerts, depending on running core batches and their setup.

Read full review

Shubham Marya

Operations Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Orchestration has streamlined workflows and enables fast troubleshooting across daily jobs

Stonebranch can be improved by making it more familiar to other tech geeks. We can add various other features such as AI to improve its accessibility because in today's world, AI is more important than manual things. If it uses AI, it will be improved. We can add a search bar in Stonebranch and enhance the searches, such as if we need to add more filters. The filtration options are very limited, so we can add more filter options so that we can search out any specific task or job very easily. Apart from that, an AI assistant will be very beneficial for the future.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	122

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JAMS?

I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?

They recently switched to subscription-based pricing, which increased. The price is fair considering the functionalit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JAMS?

As far as we are using JAMS version 6, it looks good and there is nothing major to add about it. Everything is functi...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful b...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

Compared to other vendors, Control-M is quite costly. However, all good things come with a good cost. The features, s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs JAMS

Compared 11% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs JAMS

Compared 9% of the time

Automic Automation vs JAMS

Compared 8% of the time

VisualCron vs JAMS

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs JAMS

Compared 6% of the time

More JAMS Competitors

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

Rocket Zena vs Control-M

Compared 4% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Stonebranch

Compared 14% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Stonebranch

Compared 13% of the time

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Stonebranch

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs Stonebranch

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Stonebranch

Compared 3% of the time

More Stonebranch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JAMS

December 2025

Download JAMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

December 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

Stonebranch

December 2025

Download Stonebranch product report

Also Known As

No data available

Control M

Stonebranch Universal Automation Center

Interactive Demo

JAMS Software

BMC

Demo not available

Stonebranch

Overview

JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.

Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.

What are JAMS's key features?

Automation & Scheduling: Flexible automation helps manage complex job schedules efficiently.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with platforms like SQL Server, SAP, and Python for diverse applications.
Centralized Job Management: A unified interface for handling thousands of jobs daily.
Dependency Management: Supports complex workflows with efficient dependency tracking.
Insightful Logging: Provides detailed logs and notifications for precise task execution.

What benefits should users look for in JAMS reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Automates repetitive tasks, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.
Scalability: Flexible licensing models grow with business size and needs.
Efficient Workflow Automation: Streamlines job orchestration across environments.
Responsive Support: Helps ensure smooth operations with quick troubleshooting.

In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.

JAMS Software

Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.

Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.

What are the key features of Control-M?

Cross-Platform Scheduling: Facilitates seamless task management across various OS environments.
Automation: Provides efficient workflow automation for complex processes.
Third-Party Integration: Ensures smooth integration with applications like SAP and Informatica.
Graphical Interface: Simplifies job management and monitoring with user-friendly design.
Managed File Transfer: Enhances data transfer processes with structured handling.
Real-Time Alerts: Offers notifications for immediate response to workflow issues.

What benefits should organizations expect from Control-M?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines operations and reduces manual workload.
Enhanced Productivity: Automation and monitoring features boost operational output.
Improved Compliance: Supports SLA achievement and regulatory requirements.
Operational Agility: Provides flexible and adaptable task management across platforms.

Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.

BMC

Stonebranch specializes in enterprise automation, excelling in workload scheduling and batch processing across platforms like Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries. This platform offers robust automation, enhancing operational efficiency and supporting digital transformation.

Stonebranch's platform-agnostic capabilities allow organizations to manage and integrate workloads seamlessly. Its Universal Controller is central to task management, offering a web-based interface for flexibility. Users appreciate its stability, with reliable agents facilitating workflow creation without specialized skills. Efficient file transfers and scheduling tools minimize maintenance, supporting diverse tech environments. Though Stonebranch is beneficial, users look for improvements in graphical workflow visibility, finalized API functionalities, and enhanced connectivity with tools like Microsoft SRS. Enhancements in training materials and cloud availability are also desired.

What are the key features of Stonebranch?

Ease of Automation: Simplifies workflow creation with user-friendly interfaces.
Integration Capabilities: Supports diverse platforms, ensuring seamless task management.
Platform-Agnostic Support: Compatible with Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries.
Universal Controller: Centralizes task management for enhanced control.
Reliable Agents: Ensures stable deployment and operation.
Web-Based Interface: Offers flexibility in environment and access.

What benefits should you consider in Stonebranch reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Reduces manual effort with automated processes.
Digital Transformation: Enables complex tasks without specialized skills.
Flexibility: Supports multiple environments and web accessibility.
Centralized Management: Universal Controller simplifies oversight.

Stonebranch finds applications in sectors requiring enterprise automation. Organizations leveraging Linux, Windows, iSeries, and zSeries utilize it for workflow automation, file management, and integrating distributed workloads. It supports tasks like data extraction and analytics, managing thousands of daily operations to enhance visibility and minimize manual interventions.

Stonebranch

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital

The Bank of East Asia, LINE Bank Taiwan, Coop, Air Europa, Carrefour, Itau Unibanco, Snam, Embraer, ANZ Bank, EDP, Dominio's, Tampa General Hospital, W&W Informatik GmbH, Veterans General, Up Sí Vale, Sky Italia, REWE digital GmbH, Raymond James, Railinc, Navistar, Management Science Associates, Colruyt, CARFAX, Banpara, Aspiag Service, Amadeus, AG Insurance, ING Bank Slaski

Nissan, Coop, United Supermarkets, Groupon, CSC, Orbitz, Johnson & Johnson, BMW, Qantas.

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. Stonebranch

November 2025

Free Report: Control-M vs. Stonebranch

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. Stonebranch and other solutions. Updated: November 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. Stonebranch report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.