Control-M vs Resolve Actions comparison

BMC and Resolve Systems are both solutions in the Process Automation category. BMC is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while Resolve Systems is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. BMC holds a 4.5% mindshare in PA, compared to Resolve Systems’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Resolve Systems users who would recommend it.

Control-M

Read 123 Control-M reviews

3,656 Views
912 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Resolve Actions

Read 1 Resolve Actions review

116 Views
31 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Control-M

Resolve Actions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Control-M and Resolve Actions based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Control-M

Ranking in Process Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

123

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th), Workload Automation (1st)

Resolve Actions

Ranking in Process Automation

30th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Control-M is 4.5%, up from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Resolve Actions is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

Efficient automation and boosted workflow but needs better integration methods

Control-M is a bit faster compared to other solutions. The job and coding are easier. Also, my DevOps and Ops teams work collaboratively with it, enhancing its efficiency. The workflow is much easier compared to the ACS services we were using. Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.

Read full review

Naresh Rayakwar

Lead architect at Tech Mahindra Limited

Stable platform with a straightforward setup process

The initial setup process is straightforward. It usually takes a day if all the prerequisites are met. It requires correctly configuring the property file. The process is particularly uncomplicated if the deployment is on a standalone system. However, in a clustered environment, the property file needs to be deployed on each server with precise sequencing, following the guidelines provided by the system. The installation script is then executed to install the overall product. The deployment time depends on different use cases and requires one executive to work on it. The level of maintenance support is also based on the use cases. Two executives can easily maintain the product for a simple vanilla setup with normal use cases.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has a very good GUI. We can search for a job very easily. The web interface, user account creation, and access control are very good. From an access control point of view, we can provide access to as many users as we want. A second group of users can be given a certain number of features, according to the requirements. The web interface is very easy for end users to login and use. A lot of features have been added, e.g., adding jobs. They can add jobs to their stuff, whatever they want, then get it validated by the scheduling team and work it into production."

"We have a team called pro-mon and they monitor all the jobs for us. A single view for them makes it easy for them to monitor things."

"The best part about this product is that it has a lot of features. Control-M doesn't limit us and we can use it for a lot of things."

"The monitoring tool is very good. It's very easy for expert and entry-level users to use on short notice."

"My organization has been able to script scheduled jobs in Control-M to potentially replace legacy products that are at end of life or end of service. The previous backup applications that were being used for specific files, folders, or applications were no longer being supported, therefore being able to use Control-M to replace that has been very valuable."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Most valuable feature would be the ability to detect and notify when a process has not completed successfully."

"It is very stable. We hardly get calls in respect to issues on Control-M, particularly on version 9.0.19."

More Control-M pros

"The platform allows us to create workflows easily."

Cons

"The downtime is higher compared to AWS."

"The biggest improvement they could have is better QA testing before releases come out the door."

"Control-M should receive more notice when it releases new features. The user interface is also a bit complex, and the navigation should be streamlined."

"We would recommend modernizing the look and feel of Control-M. They also need to move towards more self-service and development in their environment. It's very antiquated."

"A developer sandbox could be very helpful to try out new features or experience them."

"Its architecture is old. AutoSys gives more flexibility."

"The response time could be faster when you need a person to answer your questions. There are situations where availability becomes crucial."

"An issue we have run into in our lower environments is that Control-M can log you out frequently."

More Control-M cons

"Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is now from my previous years as support for banks and big companies. If it's not enterprise scale, I find that it's too expensive for smaller companies. You really have to be quite big and need to have a dedicated support staff to run it, then you'll be fine. What we've seen at smaller companies, it's too expensive because they want to automate everything. Now, stuff that can literally run once a day for the rest of their lives is costing them $3 a job a day. It becomes too expensive, eventually. They are not seeing the return on investment because it's not business critical. Nobody is going to die or they're going to lose money if that job didn't run exactly at 11 minutes past 4:00. It's definitely for bigger enterprise companies, especially banks or healthcare providers. We have had an instance where Control-M was unavailable due to external factors for 20 minutes and there was a loss of almost a million euros because the solution involved logistics."

"Its cost can be more competitive. One of the main things customers look at is the cost. It's not affordable. The cost is very high, according to my customers."

"Pricing can be steep, but you get what you pay for."

"The solution is not cheap, it comes with quite a hefty price tag. Control-M is the market leader, but we still want the price to be as friendly as possible."

"We have a license till 2024. We are good and satisfied with it."

"You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."

"It is not bad. The company can afford it, and it pays for itself. We have those jobs running automatically."

"They are expensive. If we were a small company, it would be complicated because we have to have strong sales and operations to be able to afford a tool of this level. Being a large company, the cost-benefit is covered, but it is not within the level of cheap solutions."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

"They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

Its cost can be more competitive. One of the main things customers look at is the cost. It's not affordable. The cost is very high, according to my customers. The licensing cost is very high, and t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Resolve Actions?

The platform allows us to create workflows easily.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Resolve Actions?

They offer a subscription-based license and not a perpetual license for the platform. You have to purchase a yearly license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Resolve Actions?

Currently, the libraries are more specific to a few network equipment providers. They could introduce more libraries from different vendors.

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 15% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 7% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Camunda vs Resolve Actions

Compared 100% of the time

More Resolve Actions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

June 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

May 2025

Download Resolve Actions product report

Also Known As

Control M

No data available

Overview

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?

Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
Role-based administration: Provides access control
Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
Reporting: Generates insightful reports
Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins

What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?

Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
Ease of use: User-friendly interface
Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
Scalability: Supports growth and scale
Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

BMC

Resolve Actions is a powerful tool that effectively addresses and resolves issues or problems. It streamlines processes, improves efficiency, and ensures timely resolution of tasks. With features like task management, incident tracking, and request management, teams can collaborate and communicate effectively. Resolve Actions helps to prioritize and assign tasks, ensuring accountability and providing a centralized platform for monitoring progress and performance. Its seamless integration with other systems and user-friendly interface make it a valuable business tool.

Resolve Systems

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

1. IBM 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. Google 5. Apple 6. Facebook 7. Tesla 8. Netflix 9. Adobe 10. Salesforce 11. Oracle 12. Cisco 13. Intel 14. HP 15. Dell 16. Samsung 17. Sony 18. Twitter 19. Uber 20. Airbnb 21. LinkedIn 22. Spotify 23. Pinterest 24. Snapchat 25. Dropbox 26. Slack 27. Square 28. Zoom 29. Shopify 30. Reddit 31. TikTok 32. Lyft

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, BMC, Temporal Technologies and others in Process Automation. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.