Control-M vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform comparison

BMC and Salesforce are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6, while Salesforce is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. BMC holds a 15.2% mindshare in WA, compared to Salesforce’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Salesforce users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 13, 2026

Control-M and MuleSoft Anypoint Platform compete in enterprise IT solutions, focusing on automation and integration. Control-M is favored in environments requiring extensive automation due to its robust control modules and customization features. MuleSoft stands out in API management with extensive connectors, appealing to businesses needing versatile integration capabilities.

Features: Control-M offers strong automation capabilities with control modules for third-party integrations, cross-platform support, and an intuitive GUI. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides API management, a vast array of connectors, and rapid API development with a focus on ease of use in API integration.

Room for Improvement: Control-M can improve output analysis, reporting options, and address version compatibility issues. MuleSoft could enhance its documentation, simplify pricing models, and improve runtime management. Control-M users are concerned about high costs, while MuleSoft users desire better technical support and integration features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M is primarily deployed on-premises with challenging setup, but generally high-rated customer support. MuleSoft is preferred for cloud deployments, offering flexibility with varied customer experiences in support responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Control-M is considered costly, with licensing based on job or agent count but provides good long-term ROI through its automation advantages. MuleSoft also has a complex, high-cost pricing model, delivering value with its integration power. Both are positioned as premium solutions with enterprise-grade functionality.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,511 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.3

JAMS automates job management, reducing costs and labor while enhancing efficiency and allowing staff to focus on critical tasks.

Sentiment score

6.5

Control-M's automation enhances efficiency and service speed, reducing costs and downtime, offering high ROI despite initial expenses.

Sentiment score

5.5

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides ROI through cost efficiency, reduced maintenance expenses, and enabling reuse in enterprises and smaller businesses.

The design of JAMS makes it very easy to copy jobs and make minimal changes while ensuring functionality.

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.

reviewer1929963

Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.

reviewer1207266

Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.4

JAMS offers impressive, knowledgeable support with quick, effective solutions, proactively addressing user needs through various channels.

Sentiment score

7.2

BMC Control-M's support is praised for responsiveness and expertise, but consistency and timeliness need improvement according to users.

Sentiment score

6.7

MuleSoft Anypoint has highly-rated support with fast response times, though documentation and response times need improvement.

Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We contacted JAMS vendor, who guided us through the necessary steps, and after following their guidance, everything was resolved.

Papisetty Manikanta

ETL Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.

reviewer2746302

architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.

reviewer2336493

Solutions Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

I would probably rate the support for MuleSoft Anypoint Platform a nine on a scale from one to ten.

Greg O

Senior Validation Engineer at Weir Group PLC

The Salesforce team offers different levels of support.

Satish Vardhani

Senior Consultant at Radiotechnologies

The support team is responsive and helpful.

PietroDell'Erba

Solutions Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.6

JAMS efficiently scales to handle thousands of jobs daily, offering flexibility, ease, and consistent performance, though licensing may limit scalability.

Sentiment score

7.5

Control-M excels in scalability across industries, though some users note high costs and challenges with cloud integrations.

Sentiment score

7.3

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers scalable, flexible solutions for enterprises, though automated scalability and data demands can be limiting.

We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

JAMS's scalability is noteworthy; we run 6,000 jobs per day without facing any problems.

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.

reviewer2752227

Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.

Iain Airlie

Senior Control-M Consultant at Ktsl

It can absorb more workload wherever needed.

reviewer2587689

Cloud/Devops Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is quite scalable, and it meets our use cases with no issues preventing implementation.

PietroDell'Erba

Solutions Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

MuleSoft provides the ability to scale, yet it is costly to do so.

reviewer2591856

Integration Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.4

JAMS is stable and reliable, with the desktop version praised, while rare issues are due to external factors.

Sentiment score

7.7

Control-M is highly stable, with minor issues usually due to external factors, and users rate its stability highly.

Sentiment score

7.7

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is stable, though users report occasional connector issues and variability in scalability and performance.

We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.

reviewer2775462

Technical architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

The downtime is higher compared to AWS.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.

reviewer2518842

Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report

Room For Improvement

JAMS users seek enhanced UI, search, automation, security, AI integration, and documentation to improve functionality and performance.

Users seek improved reporting, cloud features, GUI, module compatibility, automation, support, cost, and AI in Control-M.

MuleSoft users seek faster updates, improved support, better pricing, enhanced UI, and expanded Anypoint MQ and integration capabilities.

Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services.

Papisetty Manikanta

ETL Data Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.

Sham Suresh

Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering

We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.

reviewer2752227

Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.

Vishal Leekha

Sr Manager at Vodafone

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

MuleSoft is considered expensive, so pricing is a major concern.

reviewer2591856

Integration Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

When dealing with multiple transactions or trading, the system can lose control, and tracking becomes hectic.

Satish Vardhani

Senior Consultant at Radiotechnologies

Currently, it uses other standards, but adopting OpenAPI, the standard in the market, would be beneficial.

PietroDell'Erba

Solutions Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report

Setup Cost

JAMS offers competitive pricing for enterprise scheduling, with flexibility in licensing and lower costs than Control-M and Tivoli.

Control-M's pricing is considered expensive, but its comprehensive features often justify the investment for larger enterprises.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is costly, best for larger organizations, offering workload reduction but requires careful cost planning.

The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.

reviewer2518842

Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.

Mark_Francome

Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.

reviewer2752227

Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

MuleSoft is considered one of the more expensive products in the market.

reviewer2591856

Integration Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

I do not know the specific costs, but given that it is part of MuleSoft, I suspect it is not cheap.

PietroDell'Erba

Solutions Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

The platform reduces manual workload in maintaining infrastructure, but it does come with some cost considerations.

Satish Vardhani

Senior Consultant at Radiotechnologies

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report

Valuable Features

JAMS offers automation, intuitive scheduling, and integration, enhancing efficiency with flexible workflows, PowerShell support, and responsive user assistance.

Control-M offers robust integration, automation, and monitoring features to enhance workflow efficiency and streamline operational processes.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform excels in API management, seamless integration, user-friendly design, scalability, and connectivity for hybrid environments.

JAMS has positively impacted my organization by completely removing the headache of scheduling jobs, not just for the organization but for all internal operations teams need.

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.

Patrick Norton

Manager of Reliability Engineering and Security Operations at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.

Sean Healy

System Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the JAMS report

Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.

Kevin-Clark

IT Guy at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

The most valuable feature is the full lifecycle management, including Anypoint Designer and Exchange, as well as Discofolio API.

reviewer2591856

Integration Lead at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

The platform is integrated with Salesforce, making it preferable when using Salesforce products.

Satish Vardhani

Senior Consultant at Radiotechnologies

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform helps to standardize data integration approaches, making it easier to implement integration projects.

PietroDell'Erba

Solutions Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report

Categories and Ranking

JAMS

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of JAMS is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 15.2%, down from 25.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is 5.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Control-M	15.2%
JAMS	2.6%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	5.4%
Other	76.8%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Has streamlined complex job scheduling across scripting languages while reducing manual effort

JAMS could be improved with a web client that is accessible and as fast as a normal website, eliminating the need to RDP to the servers to access the JAMS client. A functionality running on the JAMS server to continuously check the JAMS agents would ensure they are working properly. If an agent is not responding, a feature to restart the service from the job server machine would be beneficial. The upgrade process, particularly when switching from V6 to V7, could be clearer in terms of documentation, ideally with screenshots showing exactly what needs to be done on each screen.

Read full review

Raj Pattni

Batch Admin at NBC Universal

Brings data together from multiple platforms and optimizes cross-environment orchestration

The features of Control-M that I like the most include the ability to easily integrate or bring in different platforms into Control-M. For instance, AWS, mainframe, TWS, and something that's running on Autosys can all be brought into Control-M, converted to how Control-M runs it, and then the batch can be executed. This centralizes various applications in Control-M, which doesn't just have to handle batch processes, but also other tasks like reporting on required data. I find this functionality very useful and the setup is impressive, with more advancements yet to come. With Control-M, my company has achieved several measurable improvements since I started. The metrics indicate that the number of failures has dropped, and we have addressed the issue of excessive false alerts that I encountered when I joined. Previously, we received an overwhelming number of alerts daily, but now we manage to maintain that at a normalized level, perhaps around five to fifteen alerts, depending on running core batches and their setup.

Read full review

Greg O

Senior Validation Engineer at Weir Group PLC

Integration workflows have become transparent and secure while error tracking is streamlined

The best features in MuleSoft Anypoint Platform for me are transparency between logging in or deploying and using different environments. Managing different environments for the transparency of error logins or how to trace traceability is very important. It's very easy to use and sort, so you can see where everything has gone right and everything has gone wrong. I'm aware of the drag-and-drop interface in MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, and it's very, very quick. It's very time-saving and very efficient. The security features on MuleSoft Anypoint Platform help maintain data integrity in my organization; I would say it's second to none. It's one of the best out there that I have worked with because of the encryption and decryption, and there are a lot of security aspects. I would assess the platform's data mapping and transformation capabilities as amazing. Automation has been straightforward; the transformation and mapping have been easy to use, easy to source, and from the source to the target. I would say it has been very good.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

27%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	139

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	30

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JAMS?

I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?

They recently switched to subscription-based pricing, which increased. The price is fair considering the functionalit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JAMS?

As far as we are using JAMS version 6, it looks good and there is nothing major to add about it. Everything is functi...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful b...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

From what I know about pricing, I would probably put Control-M in the expensive category, but you do pay for what you...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mule Anypoint Platform?

I architected solutions using Oracle SOA/OSB, Spring Boot, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybr...

See all answers

How does TIBCO BusinessWorks compare with Mule Anypoint Platform?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether TIBCO BusinessWorks or Mule Anypoint platform integration ...

See all answers

What can Mule Anypoint Platform be used for and what do you use it for most often?

This is a very flexible solution that comes with multiple uses. My organization mostly uses Mule Anypoint Platform f...

See all answers

Comparisons

Redwood RunMyJobs vs JAMS

Compared 10% of the time

Stonebranch vs JAMS

Compared 10% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs JAMS

Compared 10% of the time

Automic Automation vs JAMS

Compared 8% of the time

VisualCron vs JAMS

Compared 7% of the time

More JAMS Competitors

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Redwood RunMyJobs vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 16% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 3% of the time

Apache Kafka vs MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Compared 2% of the time

More MuleSoft Anypoint Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JAMS

January 2026

Download JAMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

January 2026

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

January 2026

Download MuleSoft Anypoint Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Control M, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, BMC Australia CTM

Data Integrator, Anypoint MQ

Interactive Demo

JAMS Software

BMC

Demo not available

Salesforce

Overview

JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.

Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.

What are JAMS's key features?

Automation & Scheduling: Flexible automation helps manage complex job schedules efficiently.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with platforms like SQL Server, SAP, and Python for diverse applications.
Centralized Job Management: A unified interface for handling thousands of jobs daily.
Dependency Management: Supports complex workflows with efficient dependency tracking.
Insightful Logging: Provides detailed logs and notifications for precise task execution.

What benefits should users look for in JAMS reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Automates repetitive tasks, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.
Scalability: Flexible licensing models grow with business size and needs.
Efficient Workflow Automation: Streamlines job orchestration across environments.
Responsive Support: Helps ensure smooth operations with quick troubleshooting.

In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.

JAMS Software

Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.

Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.

What are Control-M's key features?

Automation and Orchestration: Simplifies workflow management.
Integration: Connects with diverse applications seamlessly.
User Interface: Facilitates easy navigation.
Managed File Transfer: Streamlines secure file movements.
Self-Service: Empowers users to independently manage tasks.
Cross-Platform Support: Handles complex workflows efficiently.
Batch Impact Manager: Enhances scheduling and SLA management.
API Integration: Extends versatility across environments.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Optimizes operations through automation.
Scalability: Supports enterprise growth and workload demands.
Improved SLA Management: Enhances reliability in scheduling.
Cost Savings: Streamlines processes to reduce operational costs.
Process Optimization: Ensures secure and efficient data exchanges.

Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.

BMC

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform provides API management and integration capabilities with scalability, ensuring seamless connectivity across systems.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform offers API management and integration capabilities within a user-friendly interface. With a range of connectors and the ability to handle integration patterns, it enables data integration across environments with support for API-led connectivity. High scalability, observability, batch processing, and tooling are key features, enhancing performance while simplifying deployment.

What are the standout features of MuleSoft Anypoint Platform?

API Management: Comprehensive tools for managing APIs effectively.
Integration Capabilities: Facilitates diverse integration patterns.
Connectors: Extensive library for connecting various systems.
Observability: Enhances monitoring and performance tracking.
Batch Processing: Manages large volumes of data efficiently.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Scalability: Adaptable to growing data demands across platforms.
Performance: Simplifies complex deployments and improves processing.
Flexibility: Supports multiple environments, from cloud to on-premises.
User-Friendly: Streamlines integration processes with robust tools.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform is employed by organizations for API management and seamless integration across systems in industries like retail and e-commerce. It connects enterprise applications in environments such as SAP and Salesforce. Users leverage it for data transformation and synchronization, achieving efficient real-time processing and a middleware layer across systems.

Salesforce

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital

The Bank of East Asia, LINE Bank Taiwan, Coop, Air Europa, Carrefour, Itau Unibanco, Snam, Embraer, ANZ Bank, EDP, Dominio's, Tampa General Hospital, W&W Informatik GmbH, Veterans General, Up Sí Vale, Sky Italia, REWE digital GmbH, Raymond James, Railinc, Navistar, Management Science Associates, Colruyt, CARFAX, Banpara, Aspiag Service, Amadeus, AG Insurance, ING Bank Slaski

VMware, Gucci, MasterCard, Target, Time Inc, Hershey's, Tesla, Spotify, Office Depot, Intuit, CBS, Amtrak, Salesforce, Gap, Ralph Lauren

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

January 2026

Free Report: Control-M vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,511 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. MuleSoft Anypoint Platform report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.