We performed a comparison between Conformiq and TFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Management Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The tool has the ability to integrate with various requirement management, test management, and version control tools."
"Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart."
"The work item feature is most valuable. It allows us to store all product requirements. We can also link the test cases to those requirements so that we know which feature has already been tested, and which one is waiting for testing. We can also couple the code reviews, unit tests, and automated tests into these requirements. It is reliable. It has all the features and good performance. It also has reporting tools or analysis tools."
"The interface is good with TFS."
"The solution is very much stable."
"It is easy to push our changes from quality to pre-prod and prod."
"The most valuable feature from my point of view is project management, which includes user stories as well as task management."
"The most valuable feature of TFS is that it keeps the code secure while working collaboratively in a team of four or five individuals."
"For what I need TFS for, I have never run into any limitation."
"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."
"Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have."
"It would be helpful to have a feature in the tool's UI to map object locators within the system."
"I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow."
"TFS isn't a great tool if you're on the cloud."
"The price could be cheaper."
"The project management side should be addressed and the project and release planning should be somewhat extended."
"I'm looking for specific options that aren't currently available, such as active status, new status, or what's currently in progress."
"There's not automatic access to test case management and execution."
"I only use 1% of the functionality, so I am not familiar enough to know what needs to be improved."
"They have room for improvement in merging the source code changes for multiple developers across files. It is very good at highlighting the changes that the source code automatically does not know how to handle, but it's not very good at reporting the ones that it did automatically. There are times when we have source code that gets merged, and we lose the changes that we expected to happen. It can get a little confusing at times. They can just do a little bit better on the merging of changes for multiple developers."
"TFS is scalable with different Microsoft tools for test management but it is not scalable with other third-party tools."
Conformiq is ranked 11th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews while TFS is ranked 1st in Test Management Tools with 22 reviews. Conformiq is rated 8.0, while TFS is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Conformiq writes "Feature-rich stable tool with multiple options to control output, good integration with other tools, and knowledgeable support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TFS writes "It is helpful for scheduled releases and enforcing rules, but it should be better at merging changes for multiple developers and retaining the historical information". Conformiq is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer and Cognizant ADPART, whereas TFS is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Rally Software, Visual Studio Test Professional and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. See our Conformiq vs. TFS report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
