We performed a comparison between Comodo RMM and Kaseya VSA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The management feature is very good. You get a complete and clear view of the employment tool on Linux, Mac, and Windows operating systems (even on mobile). Third-party integration is also possible (e.g., IBM, Apple, etc.)."
"The most valuable features of Comodo RMM are the security antivirus and the ability to use other applications like the PSA and the ticketing system on one dashboard."
"We like the auto containment feature."
"Kaseya VSA's best features are auditing and reporting."
"Provides efficient automation."
"The way Kaseya VSA treats application vulnerabilities is good. They have released some new features that have been a benefit, such as updates from the Microsoft repository directory."
"This solution is our RMM tool and we love the deployment features."
"The patching is very efficient and we can rely on the alerts that we receive."
"I like the remote control, audit, inventory, patch management, software management, and monitoring features."
"The most valuable feature of Kaseya VSA is the ability to control laptops remotely."
"The product's support team is very quick to respond, especially because the tool's technical team operates in the same time zone where I am located."
"Comodo RMM is really, really slow to load, and connecting with most of my clients takes a while."
"The solution needs further integration with other software tools like a CRM and other accounting tools. Not having this integration makes Comodo RMM limited in functionality. Additionally, more network management features would be good to have in the next release."
"They should integrate email security in the same solution."
"The predefined reports are not up to the mark and you have to do a lot of customization."
"The agent-based monitoring solution can be improved."
"I would like to see improved virtual infrastructure management."
"Its scripting language kind of sucked. They have their own version of PowerShell inside VSA. if you want to reach out and grab endpoint information, for instance, to know how many end devices have a program installed, you actually have to write a script for that. It wasn't like how it is in CrowdStrike where you can just do a search, and it just happened. In VSA, you have to write your own script to do it. In terms of new features, an integrated MDM for mobile devices would be awesome."
"The solution is hard to use at first until you understand how it works."
"If you compare with other products, Manage Engine has some features that we like but are not present in Kaseya."
"The stability of the solution is good but it can be improved."
"The product's user interface is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
Comodo RMM is ranked 13th in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 3 reviews while Kaseya VSA is ranked 2nd in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) with 29 reviews. Comodo RMM is rated 8.4, while Kaseya VSA is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Comodo RMM writes "Great remote controlling and monitoring features with a competitive price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaseya VSA writes "Single portal management, cost-saving, with thorough technical support". Comodo RMM is most compared with Atera and NinjaOne, whereas Kaseya VSA is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services and Datto Remote Monitoring and Management. See our Comodo RMM vs. Kaseya VSA report.
See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.
We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
