No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Collibra [Private Offer Only] vs Rocketlane comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Collibra [Private Offer Only]
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
497th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Rocketlane
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
49th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Yuval Rapaport - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Management at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Data cataloging has improved quality monitoring and automated lineage supports deeper insights
Integration to data sources and reliability and availability are the advantages in Collibra [Private Offer Only] that really stand out for me, and I believe those are probably the two most important points. I am working with the automated data lineage feature in Collibra [Private Offer Only]. The automated data lineage feature helps with traceability in the organization because it makes the catalog live; rather than the catalog being a spreadsheet essentially with definitions, users can not only find the business definition, but then also see which tables and columns actually create this business term. That's very powerful. Regarding intelligent workflow capabilities, I believe it impacts data stewardship tasks within my team by improving and helping in making and creating those definitions. It is essential to us that Collibra [Private Offer Only] integrates with other data systems in our environment, and we are using it, and it's quite effective. The integration aspect of Collibra [Private Offer Only] is important because it provides data integration that delivers lineage into Databricks, Salesforce, and soon also SAP.
NJ
Senior Technical Project Manager at NiCE
Centralized client projects have improved collaboration but task handling still needs refinement
One of the most frustrating things about Rocketlane is that for new tasks not part of the template, if they are not assigned a duration, moving the date range of a phase does not automatically move those tasks. I also wish Rocketlane Sheets allowed for expanding the width and height of rows in the same way as Google Sheets or Microsoft Sheets. Rocketlane has a fairly decent AI product, but the issues I have with it are more about the way my organization builds the prompts. It could be vastly improved, and I would love it if a Rocketlane product manager reached out to my leadership to help improve those prompts.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Integration to data sources and reliability and availability are the advantages in Collibra [Private Offer Only] that really stand out for me, and I believe those are probably the two most important points."
"The biggest advantage of Collibra is that it is quite business-friendly."
"Rocketlane has positively impacted my organization by allowing our onboarding managers to view themselves as project management experts."
"The customer support at Rocketlane is amazing, and I would rate the customer support a ten or even an eleven, as it is the best of any product I have ever used."
"The implementation of Rocketlane has significantly reduced project deadlines, allowing us to deliver projects on time and even ahead of schedule."
 

Cons

"If I had to rate support from zero to 10, with 10 being the best, I would give them 6.5."
"The search capabilities are terrible in Collibra [Private Offer Only] because you can't do free search."
"One of the most frustrating things about Rocketlane is that for new tasks not part of the template, if they are not assigned a duration, moving the date range of a phase does not automatically move those tasks."
"One thing that my team is looking for right now is the ability to integrate other communication systems such as Zendesk with Rocketlane."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
33%
Healthcare Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Transportation Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Collibra [Private Offer Only]?
There are some areas where Collibra [Private Offer Only] could be improved. Earlier, they didn't have this data quality module and the AI part, but now I think I have not recently used that fea...
What is your primary use case for Collibra [Private Offer Only]?
My major use case is basically on glossary and business glossary. Among other features, I see a Data Lineage feature with automated Data Lineage capability. I do not use Data Lineage.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rocketlane?
The setup cost is quite good and within market standard, actually lower compared to market standard. Setup cost and licensing are both pretty good, and the pricing is acceptable.
What needs improvement with Rocketlane?
One thing that my team is looking for right now is the ability to integrate other communication systems such as Zendesk with Rocketlane. That is one of the reasons I have not purchased it in my cur...
What is your primary use case for Rocketlane?
I used Rocketlane to track onboarding project plans for large customers. I used Rocketlane for both templatized and bespoke project plans that we put together for our clients. I also used it for re...
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Collibra [Private Offer Only] vs. Rocketlane and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.