Cofense PhishMe vs Webroot Security Awareness Training comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "We were able to find an alternative that had more open-source and more customization that was at a cheaper price point."
  • More Webroot Security Awareness Training Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Awareness Training solutions are best for your needs.
    688,618 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The GUI works well and it is really well built.
    Top Answer:It's not expensive, but it's not cheap. We were able to find an alternative that had more open-source and more customization that was at a cheaper price point. It is a little pricey for what it does… more »
    Top Answer:We used it with one or two of our clients and were not impressed with it, so we stopped using it. We started using an alternative. We had a client who was looking for Security Awareness Training. We… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    773
    Comparisons
    590
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    244
    Comparisons
    170
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    756
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    PhishMe
    Learn More
    Cofense
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    With more than 90% of breaches attributed to successful phishing campaigns, it’s easy for organizations to point to the everyday employee as the root cause – as the problem to be solved. We disagree.  PhishMe believes employees –  humans – should be empowered as part of the solution to help strengthen defenses and gather real-time attack intelligence to stop attacks in progress.

    Webroot Security Awareness Training offers comprehensive cybersecurity education that MSPs can deliver to their clients. Training consists of simple, easy-to-run courses and campaigns that minimize user-generated risks and help reduce infection rates, thereby driving down your remediation costs and adding another recurring revenue opportunity. Secondarily, adding Webroot Security Awareness Training to your portfolio will help differentiate your business from the competition through a stronger security offering.

    Offer
    Learn more about Cofense PhishMe
    Learn more about Webroot Security Awareness Training
    Sample Customers
    ADT, United Community Bank, Jackson Health System
    Pink Hat Technology Management
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Construction Company8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise61%
    No Data Available

    Cofense PhishMe is ranked 6th in Security Awareness Training while Webroot Security Awareness Training is ranked 4th in Security Awareness Training with 1 review. Cofense PhishMe is rated 0.0, while Webroot Security Awareness Training is rated 6.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webroot Security Awareness Training writes "User-friendly, has a good training content library and training videos, but it is not effective and the customization has limitations". Cofense PhishMe is most compared with KnowBe4, Proofpoint Email Protection, Wombat Security Education Platform and Fortra's Agari, whereas Webroot Security Awareness Training is most compared with KnowBe4, SafeTitan and SecurityIQ.

    See our list of best Security Awareness Training vendors.

    We monitor all Security Awareness Training reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.