Codebeamer and OpenText ALM Octane compete in the application lifecycle management space. Codebeamer appears to have the upper hand in terms of pricing and support, while OpenText ALM Octane excels in advanced project management functionalities for complex projects.
Features: Codebeamer offers effective third-party integrations, comprehensive requirements management, and robust traceability across its platform. OpenText ALM Octane is strong in agile project management, DevOps integration, and advanced analytics and reporting capabilities, suitable for complex, large-scale projects.
Room for Improvement: Codebeamer could enhance its analytics and reporting tools, improve its collaborative features further, and expand its agile project management functionalities. OpenText ALM Octane could boost its pricing model attractiveness, simplify its customization process for novice users, and improve its scalability and flexibility for different deployment models.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM Octane offers cloud-based deployment for easy scalability and provides extensive training resources to boost customer service. Codebeamer supports both cloud and on-premises deployment, known for personalized support but may face slower deployment compared to OpenText ALM Octane.
Pricing and ROI: Codebeamer's cost-effective setup allows companies to begin without significant financial investment, improving ROI with efficient performance. In contrast, OpenText ALM Octane may require a higher initial investment, yet it potentially provides a superior ROI via its advanced feature set for managing complex projects.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
The ability to generate audit evidence with a single click saves ten days of work for ten people, enabling them to focus on other tasks.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
We can expand the number of servers and resources as required.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
Beyond standards management for specific industries, Codebeamer should develop standards for areas where software code management and hardware-software integration are needed.
Older versions of PDM Windchill face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
Its ability to generate audit evidence with a single click is a significant advantage, as it saves considerable time and money compared to manual processes.
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.
ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
