CockroachDB vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and CockroachDB are key players in the database management software category. VMware Tanzu holds an advantage in handling large-scale data efficiently, while CockroachDB leads with advanced fault tolerance and geo-distribution.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions shine with features like parallel processing, data compression, and a powerful Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architecture, which optimizes data distribution and performance. It also supports external tables for efficient data loading and benefits from Greenplum architecture. CockroachDB is valued for its distributed nature, providing high fault tolerance and effective geo-partitioning. Its compatibility with PostgreSQL and efficient node synchronization are significant advantages.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu needs better stability and query performance alongside enhanced scalability. Users mentioned inconsistent performance and the need for a modern monitoring tool. CockroachDB could improve PostgreSQL compatibility and disaster recovery features. Enhancements in automatic failover and geo-partitioning are also desired. Both products face scalability issues but require different focuses for improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu provides versatile deployment across on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments, offering robust customer service. However, its Greenplum community is relatively small, affecting user experience insights. In contrast, CockroachDB is well-suited for cloud environments with public cloud deployment. Although its technical support is limited due to its open-source nature, it benefits from strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu offers competitive licensing, delivering substantial value, particularly features like GPText. It is open-source with paid support options. CockroachDB features affordable pricing but can be complex based on contract models. Users find value in its open-source version for experimentation and appreciate its balance of cost and performance. Both products offer cost-effective solutions despite differences in pricing models.