CockroachDB vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Cockroach and VMware are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Cockroach is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.4, while VMware is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.9. Cockroach holds a 3.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to VMware’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Cockroach users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of VMware users who would recommend it.

CockroachDB

Read 12 CockroachDB reviews

2,677 Views
1,856 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 83 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

135 Views
120 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

CockroachDB

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and CockroachDB are key players in the database management software category. VMware Tanzu holds an advantage in handling large-scale data efficiently, while CockroachDB leads with advanced fault tolerance and geo-distribution.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions shine with features like parallel processing, data compression, and a powerful Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architecture, which optimizes data distribution and performance. It also supports external tables for efficient data loading and benefits from Greenplum architecture. CockroachDB is valued for its distributed nature, providing high fault tolerance and effective geo-partitioning. Its compatibility with PostgreSQL and efficient node synchronization are significant advantages.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu needs better stability and query performance alongside enhanced scalability. Users mentioned inconsistent performance and the need for a modern monitoring tool. CockroachDB could improve PostgreSQL compatibility and disaster recovery features. Enhancements in automatic failover and geo-partitioning are also desired. Both products face scalability issues but require different focuses for improvements.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu provides versatile deployment across on-premises, public cloud, and hybrid environments, offering robust customer service. However, its Greenplum community is relatively small, affecting user experience insights. In contrast, CockroachDB is well-suited for cloud environments with public cloud deployment. Although its technical support is limited due to its open-source nature, it benefits from strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu offers competitive licensing, delivering substantial value, particularly features like GPText. It is open-source with paid support options. CockroachDB features affordable pricing but can be complex based on contract models. Users find value in its open-source version for experimentation and appreciate its balance of cost and performance. Both products offer cost-effective solutions despite differences in pricing models.

To learn more, read our detailed CockroachDB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CockroachDB

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database Development and Management (7th), Data Warehouse (9th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of CockroachDB is 3.8%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Antonio Tringali

Software Engineer at a consultancy with self employed

Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training

I am a freelancer. A client of mine wanted a solution that would allow them to scale yet not abandon the familiar PostgreSQL front-end (and rewrite a part of their source code). Scalability aside, CockroachDB is a fine way forward from PostgreSQL and is not changing the client source code part of the system. If you are lucky and you do not use newer features from recent versions of PostgreSQL or PostgreSQL extensions, it's fine. There are nice-to-have features for big organizations like regional tables. At the moment, my client simply does not use these. However, the serverless offer from CockroachDB is reacting well as data grows.

Read full review

Sushma Polavarapu

Sr Data Analytics Consultant at Capgemini

Create essential reporting scripts with simplicity but has some operational challenges

We mainly create functions and scripts required for reporting The product is not complex; I do not have to create stored procedures, functions, or views. It's just simple to use. There is general room for improvement. I have been using it for five years. I have faced stability issues, mainly…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has valuable security features."

"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."

"The most valuable features of the solution are its resiliency features and the geo-partitioning capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is that CockroachDB is a distributed database, which can deploy nodes running in different regions."

"CockroachDB is highly reliable."

"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."

"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."

"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."

More CockroachDB pros

"Helps us to achieve large-scale analytics."

"The product has been stable and I have never faced any kind of problems with it."

"We chose Greenplum because of the architecture in terms of clustering databases and being able to have, or at least utilize the resources that are sitting on a database."

"We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another."

"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."

"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."

"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."

"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."

Cons

"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."

"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."

"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."

"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."

"I think the engine itself could be improved. If you miss a partition key, it should be able to be modeled. This is where AI could be really helpful. For example, if a user is from Australia, the system should know to look for their data there first instead of searching in the US or another continent."

"The platform could be more extensible."

"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."

"I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations."

More CockroachDB cons

"The product has to improve the crisis management, especially in memory issues."

"The initial deployment was a little difficult."

"Implementation takes a long time."

"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."

"Extra filters would be helpful."

"Maintenance is time-consuming."

"This solution struggled with multi-regional synchronization."

"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform is affordable even for the enterprise version. It provides value for investment in terms of performance."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap. However, the good thing is that customers are willing to pay for it if they want it."

"I've used CockroachDB at a small scale on the free accounts because we are only testing."

"The product's price depends on the user's company and the contract model they enter into with CockroachDB. Depending on the contract model one enters into with CockroachDB, the product may or may not be expensive."

"The pricing is good but can be made cheaper. I would rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"It is an open-source product."

"The product is available for free use since it is an open-source technology."

"The price is pretty good."

"This is an open source solution."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."

"Tanzu Greenplum's pricing is really competitive and gives excellent value for money."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

37%

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CockroachDB?

The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CockroachDB?

I would like CockroachDB to have more compatibility with PostgreSQL, especially with the connection string and technical integrations.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CockroachDB?

I am studying how to deploy CockroachDB and YugaByteDB, and learning some basic information about them. I am testing these databases as part of my school application to find a suitable database for...

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What do you like most about VMware Tanzu Greenplum?

The loading speed is very good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu Greenplum?

It’s an open-source solution. There are no expenses for using it.

See all answers

Comparisons

Neon vs CockroachDB

Compared 22% of the time

Citus Data vs CockroachDB

Compared 16% of the time

YugabyteDB vs CockroachDB

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Database vs CockroachDB

Compared 10% of the time

MySQL vs CockroachDB

Compared 9% of the time

More CockroachDB Competitors

IBM MQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 21% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 11% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat AMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 8% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 8% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB

April 2025

Download CockroachDB product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2025

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

No data available

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database built on a transactional and strongly-consistent key-value store. It scales horizontally; survives disk, machine, rack, and even datacenter failures with minimal latency disruption and no manual intervention; supports strongly-consistent ACID transactions; and provides a familiar SQL API for structuring, manipulating, and querying data.

CockroachDB is inspired by Google’s Spanner and F1 technologies, and it’s completely open source.

Cockroach

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

VMware

Sample Customers

Baidu, Kindred, Tierion, Heroic Labs, Gorgias

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

CockroachDB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

April 2025

Free Report: CockroachDB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about CockroachDB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CockroachDB vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.