No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CM.com vs MSG91 comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CM.com
Ranking in Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS)
9th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MSG91
Ranking in Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS)
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS) category, the mindshare of CM.com is 3.3%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MSG91 is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MSG911.6%
CM.com3.3%
Other95.1%
Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Use CM.com?
Leave a review
Apeksha Ghatge - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr. Customer Success Manager - Project Delivery at Kazam
Seamless OTP delivery has enabled us to provide fast, branded authentication for client apps
What I appreciated about MSG91 is that the experience is very seamless, so we can access their APIs to check and navigate on their website itself. One of the main advantages is that it is very quick in delivering the OTP. When I dealt with other providers such as Vodafone and Hutch, it does take time and there is time lagging when delivering OTPs. MSG91 is more seamless than other SMS providers, and it is very well authenticated between our team. One tech team is involved in integrating the application with the SMS provider, so with the APIs and also with the testing part, the product is more stable. When compared to the rest of the SMS providers, I felt this is more stable. The key benefits I have seen from using MSG91 include the ability to make our own accounts. As I mentioned, we were providers who used to provide in-built apps for the rest of our clients, so instead of them finding an SMS provider, we provided the messaging OTP from our house itself, from our company's name. That was the main key benefit where the OTP goes with the SMS provider's name. Our name is Kazam, so the SMS goes by the name itself, Kazam, and the end clients were satisfied with it. It depends on partnership to partnership, but having a main account allows sub-accounts to be created so that we can provide those sub-accounts to our clients.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Communications Platform as a Service (CPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
907,816 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MSG91?
Regarding the pricing aspect, we had a setup on a transactional basis. If one OTP goes, it was one Rupee per SMS. I stay in India, so it is one Rupee per SMS, one Rupee for each OTP delivery. I do ...
What needs improvement with MSG91?
If I think of any improvements for MSG91, it would be in the documentation. Since they have the APIs, they can revise them to make it more seamless with the user experience and allow a non-technica...
What is your primary use case for MSG91?
MSG91 was one of our tools that we used for our client services regarding OTP authentication. Our company specializes in making apps, and for that, we need OTP authentication. Some clients obtain t...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Heineken, Parkmobile, Unicef, Randstad, Actito
Information Not Available