CloudVision vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Arista and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Arista is ranked #36 with an average rating of 8.0, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.7. Arista holds a 0.0% mindshare in CMS, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Arista users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

CloudVision

Read 2 CloudVision reviews

106 Views
2 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 102 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

4,235 Views
169 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CloudVision

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and CloudVision are competing products in the network monitoring category. PRTG has the upper hand in pricing and customer support while CloudVision leads with advanced features.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor provides comprehensive monitoring across various devices, historical data analysis, and affordable solutions. CloudVision offers in-depth automation features, integration capabilities, and sophisticated network management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is noted for its straightforward deployment and rapid setup, alongside dependable customer support services. CloudVision, however, may require a more complex deployment due to its advanced features but still offers effective support.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor is recognized for competitive pricing that delivers excellent ROI with affordable investments. CloudVision requires a higher initial cost which is balanced by its superior functionality and long-term ROI benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudVision vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudVision vs. PRTG Network Monitor

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudVision

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CloudVision is 0.0%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.7%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Nimit Puvar

AVP Enterprise Sales at Ashtech Infotech (India) Pvt.Ltd.

Clients experience effective network management and comprehensive monitoring

Arista currently provides their solution for their own Arista products only. A problem occurs because customers do not have only Arista products. Sometimes they have different kinds of products available in their network. For monitoring that network, they have to either procure more solutions from third parties or they have to procure the provider OEM to manage their switches. If Arista can integrate third-party switches for monitoring purposes, it will be beneficial for the customers. Arista and other competitors such as Cisco or HPE Aruba have their own benefits. Cisco and Aruba face the challenge of having multiple OS for networking their products, whereas Arista has a single OS across their products. This is very beneficial for customers as they only have to manage a single OS.

Read full review

Noman-Saleem

Network Support Officer at Habib Metropolitan Bank Ltd

Detects suden changes but significant pricing concerns affect the effectiveness of network traffic troubleshooting

We use PRTG Network Monitor for monitoring traffic on interfaces and the behavior of network traffic. If there are sudden changes in traffic or any configuration issues, we can sort them out using PRTG. It's very helpful for troubleshooting and monitoring traffic utilization on our interfaces…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A single point of management and monitoring, as well as upgradation and update is valuable."

"The product provides a central management feature. It helps in eliminating human errors. It doesn't have a lot of bugs for software."

"Speed of deployment is one of the most valuable features."

"PRTG is relatively intuitive and fairly straightforward. It has net flow monitoring and that works all right. I would describe it as a decent middle-of-the-road solution."

"It gives me a live view of the traffic on the WAN."

"The most valuable feature of PRTG Network Monitor is its ease of use."

"The network visualization helps us to drill down deeper."

"Its initial setup process is fast and easy."

"The email notifications are helpful, and the dashboards are user-friendly for people with little network monitoring knowledge."

"It helps the entire organization become digitally enabled."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"CloudVision could have a user-friendly interface."

"Arista currently provides their solution for their own Arista products only. A problem occurs because customers do not have only Arista products."

"CloudVision could have a user-friendly interface."

"They just released a newer version of the desktop app, a beta version, that I have been trialing out. I prefer the older version, only because of how the layout is designed"

"The licensing policy needs more flexibility."

"Scalability is the only major sticking point for me. There is a recommended number of sensors, which is around 10,000 and we're double that... The only option we have to scale is to buy another core, which would be a separate, stand-alone instance..."

"It would be good if there were better graphical interfaces when you have it on multiple monitors... Because we have so many servers, things can get lost in the fog a little bit. Maybe having a better way of showing different geographies, Flash, etc., would help."

"A room for improvement in PRTG Network Monitor is its sensors. Its application technology sensor, such as the IAS, .NET, etc., needs some improvement because it doesn't work as expected. For example, the IAS sensor doesn't give immediate information, and the information you get from it isn't of good value. The web GUI of PRTG Network Monitor also needs improvement because errors keep popping up if it's not been updated to the latest version. What I'd like to see in the next release of the tool is end-to-end topology mapping for the business model, and that should be required. There has to be a technical map. Technical mapping and topological creation are missing in PRTG Network Monitor, so I would like to see those in the future."

"We would like more cloud native sensors for AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, etc. A lot of businesses are moving in that direction, so having something where we can pull performance stats out of these cloud services would be great for us."

"PRTG does not allow us to scan devices like we can scan software or another problem in it. Also, I cannot draw graphical graphs in Woodview/look. Another problem is that we cannot draw a good diagram in PRTG."

"PRTG Network Monitor could improve by having a feature to allow uploading of preset standard network switch configurations and the ability to monitor the SLA configuration, such as uptime for the switches or internet connectivity. This would be very useful."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CloudVision is an expensive product. We purchase its yearly license."

"We used a product called SolarWinds in the past, and its cost was high. Whereas, PRTG came in at a third of SolarWind's cost."

"We have unlimited devices and sensors, and it is a bit pricey, but we do have unlimited sensors. With all things considered the price is fine, related to the solution itself. PRTG Network Monitor is good value for money."

"The pricing is okay and it is cheaper than some competing products."

"We are using the premium version of PRTG Network Monitor. The price of the solution is a bit higher than competitors but it is worth the extra money. However, it would be helpful if the price was lower."

"The ability to use the base version with 100 free sensors is great. The cost on other packages can be very reasonable."

"The scalability is there, but smaller companies might need CAM software to be able afford the product."

"Cost was a factor when selecting this solution, but it just did everything we wanted it to do."

"The pricing is very low compared to other solutions."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Educational Organization

36%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudVision?

The product provides a central management feature. It helps in eliminating human errors. It doesn't have a lot of bugs for software.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudVision?

CloudVision is an expensive product. We purchase its yearly license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudVision?

CloudVision could have a user-friendly interface.

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The pricing is in the middle. It's not too high, nor too low, but it's reasonable.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

LibreNMS vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Monitoring Software

May 2025

Download CloudVision product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

May 2025

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Overview

CloudVision offers advanced network visibility and management, designed to enhance operational efficiency for tech-savvy businesses. Its innovative approach caters to dynamic environments, ensuring seamless experiences.

CloudVision is tailored for enterprises needing consistent network performance and robust analytics. It provides comprehensive visibility into network operations, allowing businesses to monitor, manage, and optimize their environments effectively. Users benefit from its seamless integration capabilities, providing a centralized view of the entire network. The platform's adaptability ensures it meets the growing demands of modern IT infrastructures.

What are the key features?

Network Automation: Simplifies repetitive tasks with automated processes.
Real-time Analytics: Offers detailed insights to improve decision-making.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Seamless Integration: Combines with existing systems for enhanced functionality.
Simple Setup: Quick deployment process minimizes downtime.

What benefits should users examine?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with automated solutions.
Improved Performance: Enhances network reliability to support critical operations.
Time Savings: Frees up resources for strategic tasks by automating routine work.
Increased Visibility: Provides comprehensive monitoring for proactive management.
Enhanced Security: Mitigates risks with real-time threat detection.

In financial services, CloudVision streamlines data flow, ensuring transactions remain secure and uninterrupted. Healthcare institutions leverage it for reliable patient data management, enhancing service delivery. Its adoption in retail enables seamless connectivity across multiple locations, improving customer experiences.

Arista

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

CloudVision vs. PRTG Network Monitor

June 2025

Free Report: CloudVision vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudVision vs. PRTG Network Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudVision vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.