CloudStack vs nOps comparison

Apache and nOps.io are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while nOps.io is ranked #27 with an average rating of 10.0. Apache holds a 2.5% mindshare in CM, compared to nOps.io’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of nOps.io users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

2,189 Views
2,036 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

nOps

Read 4 nOps reviews

413 Views
343 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudStack

nOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

CloudStack and nOps operate in the cloud management domain. nOps appears to have the upper hand in AWS optimization due to its specialized features.

Features: CloudStack supports multiple hypervisors, offers flexibility in cloud orchestration, and manages complex infrastructures. nOps provides AWS-specific functionalities such as real-time cost optimization, compliance monitoring, and security alerts, enhancing AWS operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: CloudStack could improve its initial deployment complexity and streamline community support documentation. Additionally, enhancing user interface intuitiveness could benefit non-expert users. nOps might expand its cloud service provider support beyond AWS, provide broader cost management functionalities, and enhance integration capabilities with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudStack's open-source model may require expert installation, though community support aids long-term management. nOps offers simpler integration with AWS, supplemented by comprehensive customer service assisting quick setup and effective operation.

Pricing and ROI: CloudStack's open-source nature can be cost-effective initially, with potential costs for expert deployment. Its strong ROI lies in detailed cloud orchestration. nOps may incur higher initial SaaS costs but offers compelling ROI through proactive cost management reducing ongoing AWS expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. nOps Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. nOps

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

nOps

Ranking in Cloud Management

27th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.5%, down from 6.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of nOps is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudStack	2.5%
nOps	0.7%
Other	96.8%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

Tom Weeks

Sr. Director of Engineering at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Automates savings plan management and improves cost visibility while reducing cloud infrastructure needs

I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool. Its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it. I get it set up, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf. This frees my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts. It also provides a dashboard with more detailed insights into cost and AWS cloud costs than what comes out of the box with AWS Cost Explorer. Third, the nOps Kubernetes agent automatically resizes pods based on usage, which allows us to run significantly fewer EC2 instances than we would otherwise. nOps has positively impacted my organization by saving both time and money.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudStack provides an environment that is very simple to use, with built-in APIs and a web interface that supports almost all features of AWS and Azure."

"CloudStack helped us showcase our features through process visualization and functional solutions."

"Everything in CloudStack works effectively."

"Being able to completely virtualize a customer’s physical data center and migrate any workload into the cloud, and cover the most complex use cases - while offering high performance and true volume QoS, backed by SSD-based managed storage - is what differentiates it from other IaaS solutions."

"You can build your own cloud and make it customizable with APIs."

"Multiple types of hypervisor support, multi-zone support, and VPC are great valuable features."

"CloudStack is a very feature-rich product; it gives you a lot of control over your VM networks and has extensive integration with storage plugins where you can use many open source tools to bring storage into your CloudStack environment for backups or even to run VMs."

"I liked the separation of the isolated network versus the shared network."

More CloudStack pros

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts."

"The solution provides actionable reporting and cost-saving recommendations."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it—once set up, it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team to work on more valuable tasks without missing out on discounts."

"nOps smoothly integrated with our AWS infrastructure and achieved significant savings without much intervention from our internal team."

"One customer saved 35 percent on their cloud bill, which is pretty significant."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team to work on more valuable tasks without losing out on discounts."

Cons

"The product has evolved a lot since the first versions in which it was very complicated to do version updates, and had various problems."

"The area of improvement could be the regionalization aspect. For example, managing multiple regions or HubStack deployments together was not thought out thoroughly in the versions I used. We faced issues around managing the global infrastructure and had to develop around it."

"The product does not have an easily implementable payment gateway."

"My teammates have complained about the upgrade. The source code had massive files that had to be merged with our own development to upgrade to the latest version of CloudStack. It was quite painful for them. CloudStack could add some cost management tools to give me some control over the costs associated with the number of users of my services."

"The zones need to be more stable. During moving and first deployment there were a lot of issues."

"With all that simplicity come limitations that need to be understood and planned for: Accounts, domains, and user accounts are set up with public cloud in mind, not private."

"VPN P2S is cutting all connections except the CloudStack environment for the user when he is connected. I would like to have VPN like Cisco's AnyConnect."

"The upgrade process can be improved further."

More CloudStack cons

"From the features, I would like to see RDS RIs and maybe better visibility on how the engine is deciding whether to use spot or on demand, to replace the instance or not"

"The customer support is lacking but still pretty good."

"I suggest improving the heat map capability with the option to use showback values as the x and y-axis."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

16%

Construction Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for nOps?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy, and it was also brokered by us with the client. I did not purchase nOps through the AWS Marketplace.

See all answers

What needs improvement with nOps?

nOps can be improved by having their account managers be more responsive and treat customers that are tail spend a little bit better than enterprise customers. I understand that smaller customers s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for nOps?

My main use case for nOps is cost savings. A quick, specific example of how I use nOps for cost savings is through their automated cost savings feature. This involves automated management of saving...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 23% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

VMware Aria Operations vs CloudStack

Compared 4% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

Zesty vs nOps

Compared 13% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs nOps

Compared 13% of the time

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs nOps

Compared 12% of the time

Red Hat CloudForms vs nOps

Compared 12% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs nOps

Compared 10% of the time

More nOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

March 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

March 2026

Download nOps product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

nOps - Cloud Optimization Platform

Overview

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Apache

nOps is a robust tool that excels in managing AWS infrastructure by offering cost optimization, performance monitoring, compliance tracking, and change management. Users praise its real-time monitoring, user-friendly dashboard, and actionable insights that enhance operational efficiency, reduce expenses, and ensure compliance. nOps significantly improves productivity, collaboration, and strategic decision-making across organizations.

nOps.io

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. nOps

March 2026

Free Report: CloudStack vs. nOps

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. nOps and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. nOps report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.