CloudStack vs nOps comparison

Apache and nOps.io are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Apache is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.2, while nOps.io is ranked #26 with an average rating of 10.0. Apache holds a 2.8% mindshare in CM, compared to nOps.io’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of nOps.io users who would recommend it.

CloudStack

Read 34 CloudStack reviews

2,000 Views
1,820 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

nOps

Read 4 nOps reviews

249 Views
207 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudStack

nOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

CloudStack and nOps operate in the cloud management domain. nOps appears to have the upper hand in AWS optimization due to its specialized features.

Features: CloudStack supports multiple hypervisors, offers flexibility in cloud orchestration, and manages complex infrastructures. nOps provides AWS-specific functionalities such as real-time cost optimization, compliance monitoring, and security alerts, enhancing AWS operational efficiency.

Room for Improvement: CloudStack could improve its initial deployment complexity and streamline community support documentation. Additionally, enhancing user interface intuitiveness could benefit non-expert users. nOps might expand its cloud service provider support beyond AWS, provide broader cost management functionalities, and enhance integration capabilities with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CloudStack's open-source model may require expert installation, though community support aids long-term management. nOps offers simpler integration with AWS, supplemented by comprehensive customer service assisting quick setup and effective operation.

Pricing and ROI: CloudStack's open-source nature can be cost-effective initially, with potential costs for expert deployment. Its strong ROI lies in detailed cloud orchestration. nOps may incur higher initial SaaS costs but offers compelling ROI through proactive cost management reducing ongoing AWS expenses.

To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. nOps Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. nOps

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudStack

Ranking in Cloud Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

nOps

Ranking in Cloud Management

26th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of CloudStack is 2.8%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of nOps is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
CloudStack	2.8%
nOps	0.4%
Other	96.8%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Tharun Kumar Reddy Thamatam

Senior Infrastructure Consultant at Infosys

Achieving seamless infrastructure management with optimized network and user access controls

I believe enhancements could be made in CloudStack, particularly in the management servers. I had the opportunity to collaborate with one of the Apache CloudStack developers, leading to the installation of additional agents for better information retrieval from hypervisors. We implemented configurations, ensuring consistency across hosts and VMs. We also utilized Ansible or YAML files to automate password upgrades during patching activities and database management, showcasing our customization efforts for improvement. For future releases, it would be beneficial if Apache enhanced CloudStack by integrating alerting systems directly. We've had instances where hypervisors experienced overloads without prior alerts, so proactive alerts within the tool would better prepare us for addressing issues swiftly, preventing disruption in business operations. A portal summarizing system metrics alongside alert capabilities would greatly enhance our operational efficiency.

Read full review

Tom Weeks

Sr. Director of Engineering at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Automates savings plan management and improves cost visibility while reducing cloud infrastructure needs

I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool. Its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it. I get it set up, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf. This frees my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts. It also provides a dashboard with more detailed insights into cost and AWS cloud costs than what comes out of the box with AWS Cost Explorer. Third, the nOps Kubernetes agent automatically resizes pods based on usage, which allows us to run significantly fewer EC2 instances than we would otherwise. nOps has positively impacted my organization by saving both time and money.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CloudStack is a very feature-rich product; it gives you a lot of control over your VM networks and has extensive integration with storage plugins where you can use many open source tools to bring storage into your CloudStack environment for backups or even to run VMs."

"Killer features for me were: support for many hypervisors, ability to match business logic, "everything in one box," available APIs."

"CloudStack has greatly helped integrate our existing infrastructure because we manage a massive cloud platform with thousands of VMs and around 1,200 to 1,500 hypervisors."

"Everything in CloudStack works effectively."

"We like the virtualization capabilities."

"Everything in CloudStack works effectively."

"The most valuable feature from my point of view is access to environment via console through separate browser window."

"The platform is very simple to scale-out."

More CloudStack pros

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team to work on more valuable tasks without losing out on discounts."

"One customer saved 35 percent on their cloud bill, which is pretty significant."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it—once set up, it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team to work on more valuable tasks without missing out on discounts."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts."

"The solution provides actionable reporting and cost-saving recommendations."

"nOps smoothly integrated with our AWS infrastructure and achieved significant savings without much intervention from our internal team."

"I find it to be a valuable cost-savings tool; its best features include several things: first, it is hands-off, so I can set it and forget it, and it manages AWS savings plans on my behalf, freeing my team up to work on more valuable work without losing out on valuable discounts."

Cons

"From time to time there is a bug in calculating limits of resources for customer domain/account. Maybe it’s a problem with 4.9.2."

"We recognize that CloudStack is an easy-to-use cloud management platform and, in my opinion, there has been a large number of improvements in the past few years, particular when it comes to the modern UI and overall ease of management. However, I believe that CloudStack needs to grow their marketing in the commercial side. They don't have a great piece of market share right now."

"The product could improve by embracing newer technologies like GPU virtualization."

"It is not widely used so Google does not help very much when you are troubleshooting, and the CloudStack forum is not very active."

"A technology upgrade is one item which could be improved upon a lot."

"Lack of support for third-party software vendors such as Veeam and Zerto creates limitations on comprehensive offerings which would include backup and disaster recovery."

"The main reason why we started looking for another solution: backups, replication, HA, and dependency on secondary storage. CS is quite sensitive for infrastructure, and any kind of network disruption between CS and secondary storage leads to VM hanging."

"CS has very descriptive logging, and every time I faced issues and asked for help, I didn’t get any reply from the community. Reason? Its quite obvious. CS runs on specific environments, unique to each case. So, unless it is a functional issue of CS, nobody can help you. All issues were resolved by myself going through logs. This is another reason why you need smart enough people to manage it. Engineers must have knowledge of hypervisors and understand how CS interacts with them."

More CloudStack cons

"From the features, I would like to see RDS RIs and maybe better visibility on how the engine is deciding whether to use spot or on demand, to replace the instance or not"

"I suggest improving the heat map capability with the option to use showback values as the x and y-axis."

"The customer support is lacking but still pretty good."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."

"The solution is open-source and free."

"The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."

"CloudStack is an open-source product."

"It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."

"As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."

"There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."

"Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	12

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudStack?

CloudStack is open-source, so there is no cost apart from learning. Billing solutions, if outsourced, come at a moderate cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudStack?

Enhancements for CloudStack can focus on integrating more hypervisors, as mentioned regarding current features. We're working on a new feature that will allow for certain limited functions, but ove...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for CloudStack?

My usual use cases for CloudStack involve an AWS style private cloud or public cloud. I can deploy an AWS style cloud using the open source tool that is CloudStack. The use case depends on the cust...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for nOps?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy, and it was also brokered by us with the client. I did not purchase nOps through the AWS Marketplace.

See all answers

What needs improvement with nOps?

nOps can be improved by having their account managers be more responsive and treat customers that are tail spend a little bit better than enterprise customers. I understand that smaller customers s...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for nOps?

My main use case for nOps is cost savings. A quick, specific example of how I use nOps for cost savings is through their automated cost savings feature. This involves automated management of saving...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenNebula vs CloudStack

Compared 45% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs CloudStack

Compared 8% of the time

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs CloudStack

Compared 6% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

HPE OneSphere vs CloudStack

Compared 5% of the time

More CloudStack Competitors

Spot by Flexera vs nOps

Compared 56% of the time

Zesty vs nOps

Compared 44% of the time

More nOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack

January 2026

Download CloudStack product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

January 2026

Download nOps product report

Also Known As

Vmops, Cloud.com

nOps - Cloud Optimization Platform

Overview

Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Apache

nOps is a robust tool that excels in managing AWS infrastructure by offering cost optimization, performance monitoring, compliance tracking, and change management. Users praise its real-time monitoring, user-friendly dashboard, and actionable insights that enhance operational efficiency, reduce expenses, and ensure compliance. nOps significantly improves productivity, collaboration, and strategic decision-making across organizations.

nOps.io

Sample Customers

GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CloudStack vs. nOps

December 2025

Free Report: CloudStack vs. nOps

Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. nOps and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloudStack vs. nOps report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.