No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cloudcraft vs Jenkins on CentOS 10 comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cloudcraft
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
37th
Average Rating
9.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Jenkins on CentOS 10
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
449th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

PrinceKumar7 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud Engineer at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
Visual planning has transformed how our teams document aws architecture and estimate costs
The best features Cloudcraft offers include visual AWS architecture, the ability to create professional AWS diagrams quickly, significant time savings during solution design, cost estimation, and having estimated infrastructure costs directly within the architecture diagram. Cloudcraft also makes collaboration easier as architecture diagrams can be shared across infrastructure teams. AWS best practice visualization is there, encouraging better architecture design by making it easy to visualize high availability, multi-AZ deployment, public versus private subnets, and security layers. Creating architecture documentation that previously required several hours can now be completed much more quickly. Architecture design and documentation have had the biggest impact on my team. These are part of our day-to-day work that were time-consuming previously, and now they are easy to accomplish.
Lucas Dantas - PeerSpot reviewer
Fullstack Developer at Not Provided
Automation has accelerated deployments and standardizes pipelines while reducing operational errors
To improve Jenkins on CentOS 10, there are some challenges we ran into, especially when we first started using it. We missed clearer documentation, both for Jenkins as code and for some environment configurations. As a result, a lot of configurations were learned manually through tests with the team. We also missed more stable plugin updates. We had many problems with incompatibility between plugin versions in Jenkins on CentOS 10. What makes those situations challenging is that we had problems starting and restarting the Jenkins on CentOS 10 application when we needed to reuse plugins from the previous version. Once we updated some plugins to the required version, others became incompatible with the current version. It became a cycle where we had to update Jenkins on CentOS 10, the versions of the plugins we used, and the versions of the plugins they depended on, which made configuration and startup quite difficult in some cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cloudcraft is an amazing tool for this use case."
"Cloudcraft has positively impacted our organization as infrastructure documentation is more consistent and easier to maintain."
"Previously, a feature would take one month to reach from ideation to production deployment, but now we do that within a week."
"Jenkins on CentOS 10 is a very good tool for DevOps because it is an established tool with strong CI/CD capabilities."
"The Pipeline as Code aspect I mentioned is the most useful feature for us."
"Jenkins on CentOS 10 has had a very positive impact on my organization. It gave us predictability and automation."
"My advice to other people who are thinking about using Jenkins on CentOS 10 is that they can use it. It is a very secure tool that speeds up processes and links other tools in a very secure and easy way."
"The pipeline functionality in Jenkins on CentOS 10 is valuable because it provides a comprehensive view of the entire build and deployment process, and it allows us to automate and monitor every step efficiently."
"The multi-branch pipeline has helped my team manage jobs and deployments more easily."
"The dashboard and centralized process really help my team day-to-day by making things both easier and faster."
 

Cons

"I think Cloudcraft can be improved by possibly being a little less expensive."
"There are areas for improvement in Cloudcraft, such as more cloud service coverage and quicker support for new AWS services releases."
"The plugins in Jenkins on CentOS 10, while really great because of the huge ecosystem, can also be a pain point because you never know how long they will be maintained, and there's a slight instability there; if you depend on some plugin that does an integration with some product and the plugin is not maintained anymore, you're blocked from using the product features that would integrate through the plugin, and it doesn't have high availability natively."
"Jenkins on CentOS 10 is somewhat dated when compared to other pipelines."
"I believe the main challenges with Jenkins on CentOS 10 are in maintenance."
"In my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, I found Jenkins on CentOS 10 expensive. The configuration is very burdensome, and that requirement is bad."
"The difference from what I have presented is that they are easier to deal with regarding AI. GitHub Actions is already integrated with Copilot itself; if there is a build error, it explains in detail where it was and why it happened, and it asks if you want it to make the change. Azure is the same thing. I don't feel that in Jenkins on CentOS 10."
"We missed clearer documentation, both for Jenkins as code and for some environment configurations."
"I believe Jenkins on CentOS 10 can be improved by allowing some customizations in the dashboard in a more immediate way."
"Stability in Jenkins on CentOS 10 could be enhanced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
44%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudcraft?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is positive as Cloudcraft provides strong value to organizations requiring regulatory design documents and AWS architecture. I view the pricing...
What needs improvement with Cloudcraft?
There are areas for improvement in Cloudcraft, such as more cloud service coverage and quicker support for new AWS services releases. Real-time collaborative editing could be improved for larger in...
What is your primary use case for Cloudcraft?
As our AWS environment grew across multiple applications, accounts, and environments, maintaining architecture documentation became increasingly difficult. We started using Cloudcraft because the i...
What needs improvement with Jenkins on CentOS 10?
Jenkins on CentOS 10 is somewhat dated when compared to other pipelines. I would suggest improving the build performance and using distributed agents instead of running every build on the controlle...
What is your primary use case for Jenkins on CentOS 10?
For Jenkins on CentOS 10, we are mostly using it as a CI/CD pipeline to deploy our traditional applications on our healthcare platform.
What advice do you have for others considering Jenkins on CentOS 10?
I would rate Jenkins on CentOS 10 overall as an eight on a scale of one to ten. From my perspective, Jenkins on CentOS 10 has both advantages and disadvantages. Based on that consideration, I chose...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudcraft vs. Jenkins on CentOS 10 and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.