CloudCheckr vs DoiT comparison

Read 1 DoiT review

1,228 Views
1,179 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CloudCheckr

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudCheckr and DoiT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Nutanix, Broadcom and others in Cloud Cost Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Cost Management Report (Updated: October 2026).

Cloud Cost Management

Download the complete report

Helped 916,956 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (9th), Managed Cloud Services (4th), AI Observability (20th)

DoiT

Ranking in Cloud Cost Management

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Analytics (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Cloud Cost Management category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 3.2%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DoiT is 1.2%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CloudCheckr	3.2%
DoiT	1.2%
Other	95.6%

Cloud Cost Management

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work

The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.

Read full review

AbhishekGupta2

Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees

Cost analytics have driven MSP savings and commitment coverage grows across client accounts

In my opinion, the best features DoiT offers are the deep cost analytics feature, which is really powerful because it helps give a cost breakdown and cool-level visibility as compared to the other competitors. From a commitment optimization standpoint, it really helps us with effective discount rates. The MSP multi-tenant management is another feature; there is definitely a clean separation between different client environments. You also have the functionality of role-based access controls, and DoiT gives us structured client reporting across the environment. I rely on the deep cost analysis and the multi-tenant management model the most in my day-to-day work because being an MSP, we manage multiple customers and work in a multi-tenant environment. DoiT provides a clear separation between different client environments. I also have a governance feature of control so we are able to restrict different users from accessing different environments they were not authorized to. The cost breakdown feature gives a detailed analysis of the environment. DoiT has positively impacted my organization by improving overall client retention through savings, which has helped us move from reactive billing support to proactive optimization. It has helped us structure quarterly reports showcasing quantifiable impact and has really enabled our value-add FinOps advisory services. Since I started using DoiT, it has increased the commitment coverage. We are able to handle more accounts and have achieved 15 to 30% cost optimization opportunities across different areas.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"The only way I have to see the costs is via CloudCheckr."

"CloudCheckr has impacted my organization positively by making things easier and saving time, approximately three hours a week."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"If you are on AWS, you don't need to even think about it, just go ahead with using the solution because there's no better tool in that segment than CloudCheckr CMx High Security."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Our clients use this to financially optimize their cloud platform, and based on their utilization it helps to decide whether their current platform needs to be optimized and what the ideal form is."

More CloudCheckr pros

"DoiT has positively impacted my organization by improving overall client retention through savings, which has helped us move from reactive billing support to proactive optimization."

Cons

"CloudCheckr needs to be better integratable across multiple cloud environments in a hyper-cloud model."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"Self-healing could be a bit smoother and a bit cleaner, easier to access and more functional. That would help."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"I was not satisfied with the customer support from CloudCheckr."

More CloudCheckr cons

"I think DoiT can be improved because it is not as strong in Microsoft Azure as compared to AWS."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Cost Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

916,956 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	10

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reflects that it uses custom pricing based on your cloud spend, which is pretty standard for this category. I won't pretend it's cheap, but we'...

What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?

CloudCheckr needs to be better integratable across multiple cloud environments in a hyper-cloud model. CloudCheckr is still learning their process of how they are going to accomplish that because t...

What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?

My main use case for CloudCheckr was cost analysis and integration using FinOps. A specific example of how I use CloudCheckr for cost analysis and FinOps is that within the AWS platform, we used Cl...

What needs improvement with DoiT?

I think DoiT can be improved because it is not as strong in Microsoft Azure as compared to AWS. Also, it feels a little bit complex for first-time users due to the interface. There are some advance...

What is your primary use case for DoiT?

My main use case for DoiT is at an MSP level, focusing on cost reporting across multiple customer accounts. Second is anomaly detection, cost allocation by business unit or environment or product, ...

What advice do you have for others considering DoiT?

My advice to others looking into using DoiT is to spend a good amount of time building up your tagging strategy. Make sure to align engineering early in the cycle. You can definitely start with opt...

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs CloudCheckr

Comparisons

Compared 4% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs CloudCheckr

Compared 4% of the time

Apptio Cloudability vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Cost Management vs CloudCheckr

Compared 3% of the time

More CloudCheckr Competitors

Spot by Flexera vs DoiT

Compared 35% of the time

Pump.co vs DoiT

Compared 29% of the time

Apptio Cloudability vs DoiT

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Cost Explorer vs DoiT

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Savings Plans vs DoiT

Compared 5% of the time

More DoiT Competitors

Product Reports

CloudCheckr

Download CloudCheckr product report

Cloud Cost Management

Download DoiT product report

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Spot - A Flexera company

Overview

CloudCheckr offers a cohesive platform for managing cloud infrastructures with a focus on cost visibility, security, and compliance. Designed for multi-cloud environments, it provides insights and optimizations to enhance decision-making and resource efficiency.

CloudCheckr delivers thorough cloud management with features like cost analysis, security and compliance checks, and automated optimization suggestions. Its intuitive interface allows for easy deployment, supporting cost-saving measures. Users often find its cost visibility, multi-cloud integration capabilities, and granular reporting particularly beneficial. However, improvements can be made in areas such as Azure and Google Cloud integration, reporting capabilities, pricing model clarity, and UI complexity reduction.

What are CloudCheckr's key features?

Intuitive Interface: Easy navigation and deployment enhance user interaction.
Cost Visibility: Offers in-depth financial analysis and efficiency insights.
Granular Reporting: Customizable reports that provide detailed insights.
Multi-Cloud Integration: Supports various cloud platforms efficiently.
Actionable Insights: Auto-generated optimizations help reduce expenses.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Reduction: Identifies idle resources and optimizes usage.
Resource Management: Facilitates effective allocation and governance.
Improved Security: Runs compliance checks and addresses vulnerabilities.
Managed Services: Simplifies billing and supports multi-tenant environments.

Industries using CloudCheckr benefit from enhanced cloud financial optimization and security monitoring. Managed service providers find it crucial for customer billing, while organizations leverage its multi-cloud support for maintaining compliance and governing usage. Specifically useful in sectors like finance and technology, it aids in data analysis and cost-saving strategies.

Spot - A Flexera company

DoiT Cloud Intelligence™ is a comprehensive FinOps platform designed to enhance reliability, performance, and security while turning ideas into scalable solutions, significantly increasing the likelihood of achieving business goals.

DoiT addresses complex cloud management needs by offering a unique, intent-aware FinOps solution. It provides robust capabilities beyond cost optimization, empowering teams to effectively manage cloud expenses, improve system reliability, and enhance performance. Its platform facilitates seamless integration with cloud environments and automates monotonous tasks to allow users to focus on strategic initiatives.

What are the most important features?

Cost Optimization: Tools to monitor and minimize cloud expenses efficiently.
Analytics Dashboard: Detailed insights for informed decision-making.
Integration Flexibility: Works seamlessly with cloud platforms and existing tools.
Automation: Streamlines routine tasks to save time and resources.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Reduced Costs: Effective management of cloud expenses.
Enhanced Visibility: Clear insights for strategic cloud planning.
Time Efficiency: Reduced manual tasks through automation.
Scalability: Efficiently manages increasing cloud demands.

DoiT finds relevance in industries such as finance and technology, where managing complex cloud usage patterns is critical. It tackles specific challenges in these sectors by offering tailored solutions to enhance performance and cost-efficiency.

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility

Information Not Available

Cloud Cost Management