No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudCheckr vs DataRobot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.5
CloudCheckr CMx High Security users saw up to 100% ROI with cost savings, operational efficiency, and reduced manual effort.
Sentiment score
8.6
DataRobot saves $2 million annually by automating processes, boosting productivity fourfold, and reducing ML engineer requirements.
It has reduced manual efforts that would otherwise be spent checking where spending is occurring and ensuring all teams use resources correctly.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
I have seen a return on investment of 100%, with significant cost avoidance and measurable savings within the first few months of deployment.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
I've seen a return on investment, as the savings are concrete, measurable, and they show up directly in the AWS bill.
Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Previously we had five employees doing the entire workflow, and now we can do it with two employees because agents are being used to do the same which was previously being done by the employees.
Advisory Solutions Architect at Dell Technologies
For team productivity, a single ML engineer using DataRobot is equivalent to five to ten traditional ML engineers.
Senior Data Engineer at LTM
On average, we're saving about 10 to 15 hours per project.
Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
CloudCheckr's support receives mixed reviews; some praise responsiveness and expertise, while others note delays, with account reps enhancing experiences.
Sentiment score
8.3
DataRobot excels in customer service with 24/7 support, tailored assistance, and educational resources, despite some suggested improvements.
The additional support ended up taking longer than expected, with responses that did not meet our need for detailed and technical assistance.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Sometimes support needs to be reached, but they are very responsive and supportive.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
The customer support for CloudCheckr is fantastic.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
If you are paying somewhere between $100,000 to $200,000 annually, you receive a dedicated technical account manager who understands your AWS setup and models, unlike generic ticketing systems.
Senior Data Engineer at LTM
They answer all my questions and share guidance on using DataRobot scripts if certain functionalities are not available in the UI.
Staff Specialist Data Scientist at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Being cloud-hosted enables automatic resource scaling, which supports collaboration across teams.
Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CloudCheckr is scalable and efficient for MSPs and enterprises, though large data volumes may cause slowdowns.
Sentiment score
7.0
DataRobot efficiently scales for large deployments with extensive data and models, but cost remains a critical consideration.
It scales well for MSPs and large enterprises, allowing for management of hundreds of accounts and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Scalability is where DataRobot truly excels; it manages to handle millions or even billions of rows using technologies such as Spark and Dask for distributed training.
Senior Data Engineer at LTM
DataRobot's scalability has allowed us to reduce the number of employees needed for model creation.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
DataRobot is very scalable because the customer initially started with two licenses, and now they have around 20 licenses.
Advisory Solutions Architect at Dell Technologies
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
CloudCheckr CMx High Security is stable and reliable, highly rated for enterprise cloud and cost optimization despite minor issues.
Sentiment score
8.2
DataRobot's stability, supported by a 99.9% SLA and regular updates, makes it a preferred choice over Amazon SageMaker.
CloudCheckr is stable and rock solid.
Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Model stability is also reinforced through drift detection and auto-alerts if data changes or model accuracy dips, catching issues before they impact business operations.
Senior Data Engineer at LTM
 

Room For Improvement

CloudCheckr needs better Azure and Google integration, UI simplification, faster data processing, clearer pricing, and enhanced security compliance.
DataRobot needs improved integration, transparency, pricing, and support, while users seek enhanced AI features and better data handling.
CloudCheckr is a powerful and feature-rich tool with abundant metrics.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Another area is drift analysis; there have been complaints about tracking optimization opportunities, such as how to track opportunities identified in January and whether they were resolved in February.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
An area where CloudCheckr can be improved is pricing.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
If DataRobot also adds those data transformation capabilities, then it will be an end-to-end tool and the customer will not have to procure many tools for doing the ingestion and transformation process.
Advisory Solutions Architect at Dell Technologies
The integration of DataRobot would greatly benefit from allowing more realistic tools and would be improved if it integrates more comprehensively with AWS cloud and other cloud platforms.
Quality Engineering Specialist at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
For API deployment, we require enhanced data systems, including procuring new servers for GPU support.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

CloudCheckr provides cost-effective MSP licensing with usage-based pricing, offering good value and competitive rates for enterprise users.
DataRobot's enterprise pricing varies from $100,000 to over $1 million, with additional costs for setup and support.
Overall, the pricing was quite convenient and represented good value for money.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Pricing is feature-tiered under the MSP licensing, and I would say the pricing was quite competitive and fair.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
I won't pretend it's cheap, but we've saved multiples of what we pay for it, so the conversation with finance is straightforward.
Top Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
The setup cost was minimal because it's cloud-hosted, eliminating the need for heavy on-premises infrastructure, allowing us to start using it immediately after purchase.
Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford
The annual platform license ranges from around $100,000 to $500,000, typically starting at $100,000 per year for small teams with one to two users.
Senior Data Engineer at LTM
It is a bit expensive but remains very effective.
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

CloudCheckr offers intuitive interface, cost visibility, actionable recommendations, security checks, optimization insights, and automation for efficient resource management.
DataRobot excels in automation and MLOps, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and collaboration for predictive and scalable data analytics.
The cost visibility and reporting are really valuable, and the dashboard is informative and enables good decision-making.
Dev Ops Engineer at a construction company with 11-50 employees
What makes CloudCheckr easy for me to use is its intuitive interface.
Director, Trust Operations Analytics at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts.
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
By automating highly technical aspects like model comparison, DataRobot enhances productivity and reduces project timelines from three months to less than one month.
Staff Specialist Data Scientist at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
DataRobot has positively impacted our organization in many ways. First, it has improved efficiency; tasks such as model testing, feature engineering, and predictions that used to take us days or weeks can now be accomplished in hours.
Senior Data Reporting Analyst at University of Bradford
The automated machine learning and AI features of DataRobot have helped us build predictive models rapidly using hundreds of algorithms.
Quality Engineering Specialist at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudCheckr
Ranking in AI Observability
28th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Management (18th), Cloud Cost Management (18th), Managed Cloud Services (6th)
DataRobot
Ranking in AI Observability
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Predictive Analytics (5th), AI Development Platforms (11th), AIOps (10th), AI Finance & Accounting (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the AI Observability category, the mindshare of CloudCheckr is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DataRobot is 0.7%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
AI Observability Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
DataRobot0.7%
CloudCheckr0.6%
Other98.7%
AI Observability
 

Featured Reviews

AbhishekGupta2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr PreSales Cloud Architect at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Centralized cloud costs have boosted savings while reporting and user experience still need work
The best features CloudCheckr offers include out-of-the-box security and compliance check features that provide over 35 different types of compliance checks at no cost, best practice checks, and alerts. Another valuable feature is the multi-cloud overview, providing unified reporting across AWS and Azure while allowing us to create different types of dashboards based on who logs into the platform. Additionally, from an MSP standpoint, there is good ease of deployment, especially the billing and chargeback functionality for a reseller or managed services provider. CloudCheckr has positively impacted my organization by helping us manage multiple customers and tens of thousands of resources while retaining performance and visibility due to its multi-cloud support. We do not have to worry about jumping from one platform to another, and the better MSP support is beneficial from a billing and chargeback automation standpoint. The integration in compliance helps identify missing areas within our customer environments and improves them. On average, it has helped us provide approximately 15 to 20% savings through right-sizing or idle resource elimination. These are some of the immediate cost savings our customers have experienced after implementing recommendations from the tool.
Nishant Chauhan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Data Engineer at LTM
Accelerated production models have transformed fraud detection and streamlined compliant AI workflows
There are three additional things I would like to add about DataRobot. First, it is not magic; the saying 'garbage in, garbage out' still applies. If your data is messy, has leaks, or the wrong target, DataRobot will just build a bad model faster. It is important to spend time on data prep. Second, free alternatives exist; if the budget is tight, H2O.ai, AutoGluon by AWS, and PyCaret in Python do similar AutoML. DataRobot wins on MLOps with enterprise support, but open-source options win on cost and control. Finally, if you need deep learning for images and text or want full control over every model detail, coding it yourself in Python, TensorFlow, or PyTorch is still better. DataRobot is best for tabular data with business predictions. When it comes to improving DataRobot, I see a few functionalities that need attention. First, the pricing with access is a concern. Enterprise pricing starts at approximately $100,000 per year, which means startups, students, and small teams can't even test it. An improvement would be a real tier, like a $500 per month startup plan. Alternatives like AutoGluon and H2O.ai win here because anyone can try them. Currently, DataRobot operates on a try before you buy basis, which leads to a sales call rather than offering direct sign-up. The second improvement would focus on control versus AutoML trade-offs; while AutoML is fast, sometimes you need to tweak something in preprocessing, but DataRobot hides a lot under the hood. The suggested improvement would allow more granular control without leaving the UI, letting power users directly edit the blueprint code. I would like the ability to change one line instead of rebuilding the whole thing.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI Observability solutions are best for your needs.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise10
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudCheckr ?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reflects that it uses custom pricing based on your cloud spend, which is pretty standard for this category. I won't pretend it's cheap, but we'...
What needs improvement with CloudCheckr ?
CloudCheckr could enhance its Azure support, as it honestly feels an afterthought. We have some workloads on Azure and the experience compared to AWS is noticeably worse. Additionally, there's a lo...
What is your primary use case for CloudCheckr ?
A quick, specific example of how I use CloudCheckr in my workflow is that first thing every morning, I check the cost anomaly alerts. CloudCheckr flags anything that looks out of the ordinary overn...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DataRobot?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reveals that the price points can be improved and DataRobot is not so cost-effective, especially for smaller organizations.
What needs improvement with DataRobot?
DataRobot could improve by attaching more advanced AI features, which would empower its daily use to be more responsible, efficient, and provide real-time examples. This enhancement would demonstra...
What is your primary use case for DataRobot?
My main use case for DataRobot is that it is a platform at an enterprise AI level that every organization uses to build, deploy, and govern each machine learning model at scale. It is basically an ...
 

Also Known As

CloudCheckr CMx High Security, CloudCheckr CMP
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Accenture, Logitech, Ingram, Cloudar, Infor, DXC, Cornell University, DLT, Lumen, Lightstream, Choice Hotels, B-Tech, SmileShark, PTP, Explicity, JCH Technology, Siemens Mobility
Harmoney, Zidisha, ONE Marketing, DonorBureau, Trupanion, Avant
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudCheckr vs. DataRobot and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.