No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CloudBees vs Targetprocess comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.5
CloudBees enhances DevOps processes with significant ROI through automation, support, and reduced manual efforts, outweighing its costs.
Sentiment score
8.9
Targetprocess enhances ROI by boosting transparency, collaboration, and efficiency, aligning work with strategy, and reducing costs.
The ability for teams to see what other teams are working on is excellent, allowing for faster collaboration.
Senior Software Engineer at GE
I have seen a return on investment through faster PI planning and backlog grooming, unified views across teams and portfolios, improved capacity planning, and forecasting.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
I have seen a return on investment with Targetprocess, including improvement in cycle time from 97 to 45 days by understanding the bottlenecks and flow improvements through visualization and tracking functionality.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
CloudBees support is responsive and efficient, though some encounter plugin issues and delays; CloudBees University aids with technical help.
Sentiment score
9.0
Targetprocess customer support is praised for being responsive and proactive, with satisfaction ratings between seven and nine out of ten.
They have been very responsive and proactive.
Senior Software Engineer at GE
The customer support for Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Software Engineer at Unilever
The customer support provided by Targetprocess is very responsive and proactive.
Senior Data Specialist at Wells Fargo
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
CloudBees is praised for its scalability, flexibility, and efficient scaling across diverse infrastructures, despite some concerns about resource consumption.
Sentiment score
9.5
Targetprocess is praised for efficiently managing workload and adapting to organizational growth without sacrificing speed or reliability.
Targetprocess is scalable because it handles even huge data sets easily while maintaining its performance, being fast and reliable.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
It is very highly scalable because it can handle all my organization's growth easily.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
CloudBees is stable overall but has upgrade and performance challenges, needing careful configuration and technical support.
Sentiment score
9.1
Targetprocess is praised for stability and minimal downtime, though slight lag occurs with large data sets.
Targetprocess is very stable, although when dealing with huge data sets, the dashboard seems to lag.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
 

Room For Improvement

CloudBees faces challenges with user interface, performance, and compatibility, needing improvements in GUI, AI integration, and pipeline management.
Targetprocess requires AI, integration, cost efficiency, self-service, support, RBAC, and performance improvements for enhanced functionality.
I would like to see improvements in Targetprocess, particularly in AI, as it is needed to allow users to better understand and interpret data.
Fleet Manager at UPS
The cost is somewhat high, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Dashboards with large data sets can cause performance lags or time-outs, and introducing more flexible, template-based RBAC configuration would be beneficial.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
 

Setup Cost

CloudBees is seen as expensive but offers value through extensive features, with costs often handled by dedicated teams.
Targetprocess is cost-effective for large teams, affordable compared to competitors, but pricier for smaller organizations despite smooth setup.
the cost is not very effective, especially for small organizations working on a tight budget
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Targetprocess were cost-effective and relatively affordable.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
The licensing cost is very affordable.
Fleet Manager at UPS
 

Valuable Features

CloudBees provides scalable, secure CI/CD processes with seamless integrations and automation, favored for its flexibility and extensive support.
Targetprocess enhances project management with customization, integration, and visibility, supporting business alignment and efficient team communication and planning.
Targetprocess has positively impacted my organization by integrating seamlessly with AWS billing data for improved cost transparency.
Senior Software Engineer at AT&T
Targetprocess has positively impacted our organization by reducing waste through maximizing integrations, allowing us to move away from manual rate management and tracking, enabling greater visibility to portfolio change management, and enabling us to become more data-driven.
Technical Lead at Cardinal Health
The reporting feature in Targetprocess provides a wide range of standard reports and has excellent ability to perform self-service reports for any needed scenario with slice and dice and filtering at all levels.
Senior Software Engineer at GE
 

Categories and Ranking

CloudBees
Ranking in Value Stream Management Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (6th), Configuration Management (11th), DevSecOps (5th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (2nd), Feature Management (1st), AI Software Development (4th)
Targetprocess
Ranking in Value Stream Management Software
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.2
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Value Stream Management Software category, the mindshare of CloudBees is 4.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Targetprocess is 5.8%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Value Stream Management Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CloudBees4.4%
Targetprocess5.8%
Other89.8%
Value Stream Management Software
 

Featured Reviews

YashBrahmani - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Associate at BNP Paribas CIB
Offers a clear visualization and overview of workflows and helpful in managing CI/CD processes
Improvement in the sense that they can do better in terms of management of logs and stuff like that because the console logs are very extensive, and that causes a lot of storage issues. That is one of the things which is there. Also, with respect to the traditional platform and the modern platform, many things have upgraded, and it has quite improved. But when we talk about the performance of the agents, it’s still very crucial because it’s not up to par. It takes a lot of time to provision the agent and to finish the build because of the SSH connection and the JNLP connection. Due to that, sometimes the agent doesn’t get provisioned. Those are some of the blockers that meet up the time in terms of administering the instance.
JasonLiu1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at GE
Linking OKRs to financials has improved portfolio visibility and now drives faster agile delivery
Targetprocess offers several valuable features, including easy customization when required and ease of use for getting started, making it suitable for beginners. The reporting feature in Targetprocess provides a wide range of standard reports and has excellent ability to perform self-service reports for any needed scenario with slice and dice and filtering at all levels. Targetprocess is very easy to use. For beginners, screens and views are well-represented and easy to understand. Project portfolio management is easy, including budgeting, capacity planning, forecasting, and dashboards that are excellent. Targetprocess has positively impacted the organization, as visibility was a crucial deliverable. Agility health measures have increased by 30%. Feature cycle time, which is clearly measured across the ART, has improved by 50% over the past three years. The clearer and more effective measurable PI planning events are excellent, with the PI objectives achieved rate now at 80 to 90% versus 55% when starting. Measuring agility health and feature cycle time has been a fantastic part of the journey and growth, helping achieve high levels of maturity after years. Targetprocess was implemented early in the Agile journey and within six months, growth occurred with the tool, fundamentally assisting in configuring portfolios, understanding Agile ways and methodology, and allowing the creation of measures and reports much faster, fully integrated with Jira in a bi-directional way.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Value Stream Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Construction Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise17
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with CloudBees?
There are connection issues with CloudBees, specifically between Sybase and CloudBees. We often encounter connection problems, and there are issues with the pipelines.
What is your primary use case for CloudBees?
We use CloudBees for deploying the code in higher environments, such as QA, C2, staging, and production.
What advice do you have for others considering CloudBees?
I would recommend CloudBees to others because building jobs is much easier than with other solutions.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Targetprocess?
Regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing, Targetprocess is a bit expensive if it can be used by all team members, but for now, the price is manageable and cost-effective.
What needs improvement with Targetprocess?
One area for improvement in Targetprocess is that costing can become substantial when wanting to use it across all teams. A needed improvement in Targetprocess would be to build deeper AI functiona...
What is your primary use case for Targetprocess?
Targetprocess is leveraged to streamline workflows, manage resources efficiently, and ensure alignment with strategic objectives. A key feature is the ability to link OKRs directly to project finan...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Capital One, PEGA, vistaprint, HSBC, BOSCH, Starbucks Coffee
Vodafone, NHS, Infineon, Kone
Find out what your peers are saying about CloudBees vs. Targetprocess and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.