Cloud Foundry vs Mendix comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Cloud Foundry and Mendix solutions aren't in the same category. Cloud Foundry is ranked #19 in PSP , and holds a 1.8% mindshare in the category. Mendix is ranked #2 in LCDP , with an average rating of 7.8, and holds a 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of Cloud Foundry users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Mendix users who would recommend it.

Cloud Foundry

Read 2 Cloud Foundry reviews

1,750 Views
1,698 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

Mendix

Read 64 Mendix reviews

12,937 Views
6,598 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Cloud Foundry

Mendix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cloud Foundry and Mendix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat and others in PaaS Clouds.

To learn more, read our detailed PaaS Clouds Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloud Foundry

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (19th)

Mendix

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (4th), Low-Code Development Platforms (2nd), Agentic Automation (5th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (12th), AI Software Development (10th)

Mindshare comparison

Cloud Foundry and Mendix aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Cloud Foundry is designed for PaaS Clouds and holds a mindshare of 1.8%, down 2.0% compared to last year.
Mendix, on the other hand, focuses on Low-Code Development Platforms, holds 4.0% mindshare, down 7.5% since last year.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cloud Foundry	1.8%
Amazon AWS	13.7%
Microsoft Azure	12.0%
Other	72.5%

PaaS Clouds

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mendix	4.0%
Microsoft Power Apps	7.0%
OutSystems	4.7%
Other	84.3%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Carlos Bittrich

Technology Advisor at Fabrik

Quick to deploy but being deprecated by IBM and should be merged with Kubernetes

We enjoy the fast deployment. Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the developer or administrator. The autoscaling is great. It is just a switch that needs to be turned on, and autoscaling starts working. At this moment, you begin to see different meters about usage that helps you in updating the scaling limits, which help you tune the running instances. Besides this, autoscaling can be scheduled, so in times of low activity, you can have lower limits or increase in advance for special dates. It has good logging. CF has logging events that help identify when a transaction runs and its response time which helps in monitoring execution.

Read full review

Mitchel Mol BGS

CTO at Blue Green Solutions

Has improved development quality and speed but has introduced persistent IDE slowdowns

In recent years, the IDE has been more buggy and slower, and although there have been more features added, I would like to see more stability, as some areas that used to work for a fairly long time are now slower in my development, which feels like a step back. I choose a seven mainly due to the issues we've faced with slowdowns and bugs during development, while runtime has been very stable, and the overall output on Mendix platform is still good; there is definitely some room for improvement, and I would probably have given it an eight or even a nine if those issues weren't hurting my developer output for the past few years. Overall, Mendix platform is stable, but the IDE could be better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My favorite component of IBM's solution is Node-RED, which greatly shortens the amount of time required to develop, test, and deploy new applications."

"Cloud Foundry builds the runtime environment directly without requiring dependency management from the user."

"IBM is the only vendor to offer integration with blockchain for smart contract development."

"By moving to IBM Cloud Foundry, we reduced our project time by a factor of two and decreased costs by a factor of four because it was a PoC."

"We also use Mendix Enterprise Integration for complex business logic. It's a low-code platform, so we run Mendix in the Mendix Cloud."

"The most valuable features are the integration and UI customization."

"I find the fast development speed and low cost to be very valuable features of Mendix. It's a smart solution for busy developers when we need to apply new changes or fixes quickly. Mendix helps to save time and meet project deadlines faster."

"The best feature is that you can create applications real fast."

"I enjoy the low-code nature of the product; it's user-friendly, very easy to handle, and the product was easy to set up."

"Mendix is a good option for people looking for fast deployment and multiple device support with single code."

"Excellent support is offered for Mendix"

"The initial setup is easy."

More Mendix pros

Cons

"In IBM Cloud, the product has been deprecated in favor of Kubernetes, which is a more complicated infrastructure to manage."

"After the initial excitement period with Node-RED is over, you crave the need of additional integrations to third-party services."

"I would also like to see automatic adjustment to the Java Heap, whenever an application load becomes too much for the application. It could also use hot database replication."

"Overall, integration with the enterprise ecosystem needs improvement. I would like to see the inclusion of APIs that can help with the interoperability."

"We are all moving away from a monolithic product model to microservices. We are building an F2DUI application to decouple the front and back end. Mendix provides an integrated approach for both."

"The cost model could be better. It is expensive."

"When a mainframe system with a very large database and batch process was rebuilt in Mendix, we came across performance issues."

"Since it's low-code, I would like Mendix to be web-based, so we shouldn't need to install Mendix to create an app."

"We have tried to contact commercial support by phone and email but they never responded to any of our attempts."

"While the documentation is good, the development box could be better."

More Mendix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You are allocated a minimum amount of resources in the free tier. This seems fair and highly scalable, as you pay per usage as per cloud pricing schemes."

"IBM has a free tier and payment option depending on the products selected."

"The pricing models should be reworked to the needs of a wider range of companies. Some customers will not be able to afford it until quite a few years into production, even after good PoC results and a successful launch."

"Mendix licensing cost is based on the number of apps you have on the server. At the basic level, it is free of charge, so that seems reasonable, but once you go beyond that, and when it comes to the number of users on the app, that basic structure doesn't work, and the pricing tends to get a little bit steep."

"Mendix is not open source, but its license cost is cheap, particularly when compared to the Appian license. The license model would depend on how many users you have and how many applications you are creating. If you are creating a single app, you just need to have a single app license, so it's free. If you want a multiple app license to cover two thousand or three thousand users, for example, internal users or external users, then you need to pay for the license. There's also a license model for above three thousand or four thousand, or five thousand internal and external users."

"From a commercial point of view, we would like them to change that they currently sell it as a platform, but as a customer you have to decide upfront the usage of the platform. We would like to have Mendix sell it as a pay as you go model: You pay for what you use, and you don't pay for what you don't use."

"Its cost is higher than competitors. The cost mostly includes licensing. It is charged per user. The cost model could be better. When you have a big company, what does per user mean? If I have a company where I have 40,000 people who will go to access it but only 200 do, how do you license it and who do you pay for? If they hit it once, do you pay for it? The licensing is complex for a big company. It is easy for us to buy all we can eat, get an enterprise license agreement, and call it good."

"Initially, we started with a year for approximately $25,000, and if we need to expand the number of seats then we will increase it."

"Mendix seems a bit expensive. But in terms of wanting to have less developers and higher velocity, the total cost of ownership is fine. It's not cheap, though."

"Pricing used to be complex, but Mendix has improved that quite a bit."

"There is a license required to use Mendix. The solution's price is high, but it is best suited for enterprise companies that have the budget. It is not for small or medium-sized businesses."

More Mendix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	25

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mendix?

My experience with Mendix's pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is moderate—not too low and not too high. The setup cost is average, and since it is a licensed-based tool, a basi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mendix?

Mendix has evolved as much as possible, and they are currently planning to automate tasks using AI agentics and other features. Every day presents a learning opportunity for developers using Mendix...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Mendix?

My main use case for Mendix is to create enterprise-level applications for banking sectors and industrial expertise solutions with integration-level coding. One specific example of an application I...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon AWS vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 14% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 10% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 9% of the time

Google Compute Engine vs Cloud Foundry

Compared 3% of the time

More Cloud Foundry Competitors

OutSystems vs Mendix

Compared 6% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Mendix

Compared 3% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Mendix

Compared 3% of the time

Appian vs Mendix

Compared 3% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs Mendix

Compared 3% of the time

More Mendix Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

September 2026

Download Cloud Foundry product report

Buyer's Guide

Mendix

September 2026

Download Mendix product report

Overview

Cloud Foundry is an open-source platform as a service (PaaS) that simplifies application deployment and management across various clouds. It enables developers to focus on coding by automating the underlying infrastructure management.

Cloud Foundry offers a robust environment where developers can build, test, deploy, and scale applications efficiently. It removes the complexity of setting up infrastructure, providing a consistent development experience across different platforms. It supports a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, which makes it versatile for developers working in diverse environments. The platform's container-based architecture helps ensure that applications can scale seamlessly while maintaining performance and reliability.

What are the standout features of Cloud Foundry?

Multi-Cloud Compatibility: Supports deployment across major cloud providers ensuring flexibility and choice.
Continuous Delivery: Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines to facilitate automated testing and deployment.
Built-in Logging and Monitoring: Offers tools for thorough monitoring and logging, ensuring application health.
Scalability: Provides easy scaling of applications to manage fluctuating workloads.
Container-Based Architecture: Utilizes containers to ensure consistent deployment and performance.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Savings achieved through decreased infrastructure management costs.
Developer Productivity: Enables faster development cycles due to streamlined processes.
Operational Transparency: Enhanced monitoring and logging features that provide clear insights.
Flexibility to Innovate: Ability to quickly deploy and test new ideas without infrastructure concerns.
Robust Ecosystem Support: Peer and vendor support to enhance application development processes.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, Cloud Foundry is implemented to enhance agile development practices. Financial institutions use it for rapid prototyping, allowing them to respond swiftly to market changes. Healthcare providers leverage its security features to maintain data privacy while deploying applications. Retail businesses benefit from its scalability to manage peak shopping periods effortlessly.

Cloud Foundry

Mendix offers a robust low-code platform that accelerates application development and enhances business-IT collaboration with strong integration and customization capabilities.

Mendix enables rapid prototyping with visual modeling tools like microflows, aiding seamless cloud deployment with scalability and security. Its low-code environment and reusable widgets support easy REST and SOAP integration. Application development is efficient, bridging business needs with minimal coding effort.

What are Mendix's key features?

Rapid Application Development: Speeds up development with low-code tools and visual modeling.
Integration Capabilities: Supports easy integration with REST, SOAP, and systems like SAP.
Visual Modeling Tools: Offers microflows for simplified process automation.
Cloud Deployment: Provides robust scalability and secure cloud-based solutions.
Customization: Flexible UI components and reusable widgets for tailored solutions.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Faster Time-to-Market: Accelerates development timelines with low-code features.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse applications in banking, insurance, and manufacturing.
Scalability: Supports growth with strong cloud infrastructure.
Enhanced Collaboration: Bridges business and IT for seamless digital execution.
Integration Ease: Easily integrates with existing systems and improves workflows.

In banking, insurance, and manufacturing, Mendix is adopted for developing web and mobile applications. It aids in automating processes and integrating seamlessly with existing systems like ERP. Businesses leverage Mendix's flexibility in creating scalable and customized applications to streamline workflows and drive digital transformation efforts.

Mendix

Sample Customers

Grape Up, c-Com, KONE, TITAN, CSAA, Bosch, Allstate, Verizon, West Corp., Telstra

Genzyme, TNT, Yahoo, Capgemini, Roche, D&B, Aegon, kpn, AZL, Sky, Arch, Penn State Univeristy, BancABC

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Red Hat and others in PaaS Clouds. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.