Cisco UCS Director vs IBM Spectrum Computing comparison

Cisco and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.0. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to IBM’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 57% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 14 Cisco UCS Director reviews

575 Views
314 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

IBM Spectrum Computing

Read 8 IBM Spectrum Computing reviews

348 Views
147 Comparison Views

57% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

IBM Spectrum Computing

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

IBM Spectrum Computing and Cisco UCS Director compete in IT infrastructure management. Cisco UCS Director appears to have the upper hand with its extensive features, while IBM Spectrum Computing is noted for competitive pricing and strong customer support.

Features: IBM Spectrum Computing is valued for its robust workload scheduling, resource allocation, and operational efficiency. Cisco UCS Director offers comprehensive infrastructure management, automation features, and extensive integrations, catering to complex IT environments.

Room for Improvement: IBM Spectrum Computing could enhance its advanced features and integration capabilities. It might also benefit from additional automation options. Cisco UCS Director could improve its deployment process, simplify integration with non-Cisco environments, and reduce initial setup complexity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Spectrum Computing offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer service, ensuring smooth onboarding. Cisco UCS Director provides detailed deployment support, although its setup can be intricate, it remains flexible and robust to meet varied enterprise needs.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Spectrum Computing is linked to lower initial costs and quick ROI due to efficient resource management. Conversely, Cisco UCS Director requires higher upfront investments but delivers substantial long-term ROI, suitable for enterprises eyeing sustained growth.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. IBM Spectrum Computing Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. IBM Spectrum Computing

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Spectrum Computing

Ranking in Cloud Management

27th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Hadoop (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Spectrum Computing is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

Avra Jyoti Ghosh

Data QualityTechnical Architect at Mindtree

One of the best tools in the data management and services area

I mainly used Spectrum Computing for data management, governance, quality, and ETL activity Spectrum Computing's best features are its speed, robustness, and data processing and analysis. Spectrum Computing is lagging behind other products, most likely because it hasn't been shifted to the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

"UCS director enables us to be more productive and more agile, and also more self-sufficient because we don't have to depend on anybody else."

"Cisco's knowledge base is extensive."

"The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"The comparison was challenging, but the IBM Spectrum Scale offered a balanced solution. Our engineers rated itsanalytics capabilities equally high as Pure Storage. For workload management, Spectrum Computing provided effective solutions that met our needs. Workload management is part of a complete solution that uses different tools. There were the cloud and HPC parts; within HPC, there were parts like liquid cooling, simple computing, storage, and orchestration. The orchestration team handled the workload management."

"This solution is working for both VTL and tape."

"Spectrum Computing's best features are its speed, robustness, and data processing and analysis."

"The most valuable feature is the backup capability."

"The most valuable aspect of the product is the policy driving resource management, to optimize the computing across data centers."

"We are satisfied with the technical support, we have no issues."

"IBM's ability to cluster compute resources is impressive, with built-in support for scenarios like VR and active-active configurations,"

"Easy to operate and use."

Cons

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate."

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"IBM's sales and support structure can be challenging."

"Spectrum Computing is lagging behind other products, most likely because it hasn't been shifted to the cloud."

"Lack of sufficient documentation, particularly in Spanish."

"SMB storage and HPC is not compatible and it should be supported by IBM Spectrum Computing."

"We have not been able to use deduplication."

"We'd like to see some AI model training for machine learning."

"This solution is no longer managing tapes correctly."

"In Pakistan, IBM's disadvantage is the lack of OEM support and presence."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"This solution is expensive."

"Spectrum Computing is one of the most expensive products on the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

31%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

39%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind.

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Spectrum Computing?

Easy to operate and use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Spectrum Computing?

It is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Spectrum Computing?

IBM's sales and support structure can be challenging. To work on an IBM deal, you often need to involve multiple specialists, each knowledgeable about only part of the product, rather than having a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 53% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 31% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 16% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 32% of the time

Cloudera Data Platform vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 27% of the time

Morpheus vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 26% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs IBM Spectrum Computing

Compared 15% of the time

More IBM Spectrum Computing Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

June 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Hadoop

June 2025

Download IBM Spectrum Computing product report

Also Known As

No data available

IBM Platform Computing

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

IBM Spectrum Computing uses intelligent workload and policy-driven resource management to optimize resources across the data center, on premises and in the cloud. Now up to 150X faster and scalable to over 160,000 cores, IBM provides you with the latest advances in software-defined infrastructure to help you unleash the power of your distributed mission-critical high performance computing (HPC), analytics and big data applications as well as a new generation open source frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark.

IBM

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

London South Bank University, Transvalor, Infiniti Red Bull Racing, Genomic

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. IBM Spectrum Computing

June 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. IBM Spectrum Computing

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. IBM Spectrum Computing and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. IBM Spectrum Computing report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.