We performed a comparison between Fortinet Fortigate and Cisco SD-WAN based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Fortinet Fortigate seems to be the superior solution. All other things being more or less equal, our reviewers found Cisco SD-WAN rather expensive to purchase, not as secure as it should be, and somewhat difficult to deploy.
"The solution provides good consolidation, centralization, and manageability for edge routers."
"It is very simple to deploy. It's a point-and-click type of deployment, so it's fairly simple."
"It has a very good GUI."
"Cisco SD-WAN is a very good product."
"SD-WAN is very stable - once it's deployed, you can just forget about it, it runs by itself."
"Cisco SD-WAN is a highly stable solution."
"The technical support is very responsive."
"The availability of services and combining different connections is most valuable."
"The interface is very good."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate are the APIs. They are the most widely known."
"Fortinet FortiGate is a stable solution."
"The security fabric is excellent."
"The SD-WAN is the most valuable feature."
"The stability and scalability of this solution are satisfactory. Its SD-WAN, VPN, and URL filtering features are very useful."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiGate is the simple configuration."
"I like that you are able to manage FortiGate from the FortiManager to create a more centralized environment."
"They have taken away our ability to do what we are good at, which is working on the CLI, the interface right on the router. They have limited the commands so much that troubleshooting is nearly impossible."
"There should be more security features in the hybrid and on-premise deployments of Cisco SD-WAN. The cloud has most of the security features."
"I would like to see features related to security compliance, including a view of compliance with standards. With this, I should be able to do an audit of my network with SDWAN."
"The deployment is complex."
"I would like to see revision cycles to be more stable."
"Cisco SD-WAN could improve the integration with the cloud."
"The solution should not be so bound to ISPs."
"Cyber security should also be implemented in the solution, along with maybe implementation of AI/ML."
"The routing capability on the FortiGate devices has room for improvement."
"Bandwidth usage in reporting could be improved for Fortinet FortiGate."
"Fortinet FortiGate could improve by having more storage in the hardware for log data."
"Fortinet FortiGate should improve the VPN tokens."
"It is very expensive, and their support is not very good. I hope that their technical support will be better in the future."
"In some cases, its initial setup could be hard for customers."
"Currently, without the additional reporting module, we only have access to basic reporting."
"Lacks training for new features."
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 2nd in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 42 reviews while Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 108 reviews. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "The initial setup is complex, and the price is high, but it is scalable and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "Efficient, user-friendly, and affordable". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Meraki SD-WAN, Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform, VMware SD-WAN, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform and Cato Networks, whereas Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and SonicWall TZ. See our Cisco SD-WAN vs. Fortinet FortiGate report.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.