Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco IOS Security vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System comparison

Cisco and Trellix are both solutions in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category. Cisco is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while Trellix is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.8. Cisco holds a 1.0% mindshare in ID, compared to Trellix’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Trellix users who would recommend it.
Cisco IOS Security
Read 48 Cisco IOS Security reviews
  • 253 Views
  • 129 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Read 14 Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reviews
  • 968 Views
  • 650 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Cisco IOS Security and Trellix Intrusion Prevention System both serve the network security category. Cisco IOS Security often holds the upper hand due to its scalability and integration capabilities.

Features: Cisco IOS Security includes AAA, VPN, and advanced firewall capabilities, known for integration with Cisco's ecosystem. Trellix IPS features real-time threat detection and automated signature updates, emphasizing network-level threat protection.

Room for Improvement: Cisco IOS Security requires extensive ACL management and offers no automatic signature updates, with high CPU utilization noted. Trellix IPS could refine its management interface and improve detection capabilities, with documentation for easier configuration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco IOS Security is flexible for on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, with strong support despite occasional delays. Trellix IPS receives mixed customer service reviews, with some users dissatisfied with support responsiveness. Cisco's support is regarded as superior.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco IOS Security is costly, fitting medium to large enterprises with both subscription and perpetual licenses. Trellix IPS is competitively priced, with annual licensing fees. Both solutions offer significant ROI by enhancing network protection and efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Cisco IOS Security vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS Security vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco IOS Security
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (20th)
Trellix Intrusion Preventio...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the mindshare of Cisco IOS Security is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trellix Intrusion Prevention System is 3.5%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
 

Featured Reviews

Binoob John - PeerSpot reviewer
Rrobust network security and device authentication with advanced access control features
This solution should be implemented for most enterprise-level customers. It ensures that users accessing the corporate network or wireless network with their own devices are authenticated and authorized. As a network administrator, I can track who is accessing the network, what devices they are…
Read full review
Juan Muriel - PeerSpot reviewer
Protects from attacks in real-time and provides accurate threat intelligence updates
I rate the ease of setup a seven or eight out of ten. The platform functions very well. We need technical support to make improvements to the platform. The deployment takes eight months. We need two or three system engineers and one electronic engineer specialized in Trellix platforms to deploy the tool. We need only one system engineer to maintain the product.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are DNS service and shell self-service within a network."
"Cisco IOS Security increases the overall security of our network, performs authentication, and provides level 15 access and privileges."
"Technical support for this solution is very good."
"The product has valuable features for business intelligence."
"The hardware is pretty stable. It's also a very good product performance-wise. Initially, it wasn't mature like a firewall and there were other leaders, but now they have included almost all the features of next-generation security. Basically, it's a good product to work with."
"Previously, anyone in the organization would see any data point in the wall. They could just go and connect their machine with that data point and could access the network. But now, even if someone came and tried that, they will not be given access."
"What I have used the most and received the most benefit from is the IPsec technology."
"Cisco IOS Security has many good features, but compared to other solutions, it has a more user-friendly interface with steps to apply and manage rules. Another good part of the solution is that it's more straightforward."
More Cisco IOS Security pros
"The most valuable features are the customization of the signature and the unlimited amount of signatures in IPS."
"The ability to centrally manage all the IPS sensors, track the different security events generated by it, and customize the different policies, depending on their location."
"The most valuable features in Trellix for me are the automated signature updates. It is a great and convenient feature."
"There's a good dashboard you can drill down into. It helps you easily locate intrusions and the source of attacks."
"McAfee NSP is much more stable than Cisco."
"The product is worth the investment."
"The feature I found most valuable is the network threat analyzer in the security platform. It also integrates with GTI, or Global Threat Intelligence. Otherwise, I just use the basic features."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System pros
 

Cons

"Cisco very slowly introduces and implements the products, unlike other brands."
"Pricing can be reduced. I rate the current price for the product a four out of ten."
"The solution is not user friendly and it is hard to manage the GUI interface."
"If they could increase the performance a little better because the device sometimes gets slow."
"An area for improvement in Cisco IOS Security is the performance because it's not as stable sometimes. There's also some latency in the solution, which could be improved. Cisco IOS Security integrates with other solutions, but you'll encounter many errors after integration, so this is another area for improvement. I'd like to see enhanced performance and a simplified setup in the next version of Cisco IOS Security."
"The product's technical support services need improvement."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"The routers, don't have like long-term tendency features, or higher availability features available for the IOS. It could also use a better user interface."
More Cisco IOS Security cons
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The pricing could be improved."
"There are limited resources for configuration guidance."
"The technical support must be improved."
"Some of the documentation is not as straightforward as it could be."
"The solution could improve some aspects of detection."
"We would like to have a simpler version. Some settings and functions on the McAfee console are complex and complicated. I want the management console to be simpler."
"Integration with Global Thereat Intelligence could be better. Also, I think management solutions are end of life now at McAfee. Network threat analyzer may be used for endpoint quarantines. Integration between these sides, as well as endpoint APO, will help you quarantine the risky endpoints."
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You can get a better price if you commit to a longer-term license. Three years, five years, or even seven or ten years will be cheaper than a three-month or one-year term."
"The cost may be around $5,000 to $10,000 a year. If you want support you have to pay at least this price."
"The pricing is okay. It is competitive. It costs more when you need get more features."
"Cisco IOS Security price could be reduced, it is more expensive than many of the other solutions, such as Sophos and Fortinet FortiGate."
"The tool could be priced lower. If you want advanced services, then you need to purchase them."
"The cost of the license, to the best of my knowledge, is approximately two thousand dollars."
"The pricing for Cisco IOS Security is reasonable compared to other Cisco products."
"The product is expensive."
More Cisco IOS Security pricing and cost advice
"The tool is competitively priced."
"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco IOS Security?
Cisco IOS Security is a mature product with extensive capabilities, serving as the base for the defense layer. It offers good network visibility, which helps in rapid response through the Rapid Thr...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco IOS Security?
Pricing can be reduced. I rate the current price for the product a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Cisco IOS Security?
While I do not have specific recommendations for improvement, pricing can be reduced.
See all answers
What do you like most about McAfee Network Security Platform?
The threat intelligence updates are very accurate.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Network Security Platform?
The tool is competitively priced. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with McAfee Network Security Platform?
Network Threat Behavior Analysis must be improved. The technical support must be improved. The support team must provide better help with configurations of devices and enabling NTBA.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Cisco Secure Firewall vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 26% of the time
OPNsense vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
OPNsense vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 16% of the time
Meraki MX vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Meraki MX vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiOS vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Fortinet FortiOS vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 11% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco IOS Security Logo
Fortinet FortiGate vs Cisco IOS Security
Compared 8% of the time
More Cisco IOS Security Competitors
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 30% of the time
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 14% of the time
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 13% of the time
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 9% of the time
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Logo
Vectra AI vs Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Compared 8% of the time
More Trellix Intrusion Prevention System Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS Security
June 2025
Cisco IOS Security reportDownload Cisco IOS Security product report
Buyer's Guide
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
May 2025
Trellix Intrusion Prevention System reportDownload Trellix Intrusion Prevention System product report
 

Also Known As

IOS Security
McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, IntruShield Network Intrusion Prevention System, IntruShield Network IPS
 

Overview

Cisco IOS Software delivers a sophisticated set of security capabilities for a comprehensive, layered security approach throughout your network infrastructure. Cisco IOS security technologies help to defend critical business processes against attack and disruption, protect privacy, and support policy and regulatory compliance controls.
Cisco

Block More Intrusions
Stop new and unknown attacks with signature-based and signature-less intrusion prevention systems. Signature-less intrusion detection finds malicious network traffic and stops attacks where no signatures exist.

Unify Virtual and Physical Security
Support network virtualization across private and public cloud platforms to scale security and evolve with changing IT dynamics.

Maximize Security and Performance
Scale hardware performance to speeds up to 100 Gbps and leverage data from multiple products.

Trellix
 

Sample Customers

Arup Group, Brunel University London, City of Biel, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, K&L Gates , New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Offshore Northern Seas, Transplace
Desjardins Group, HollyFrontier, Nubia, Agbar, WNS Global Services, INAIL, Universidad de Las Américas Puebla (UDLAP), Cook County, China Pacific Insurance, Bank Central Asia, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, City of Chicago, Macquarie Telecom, Sutherland Global Services, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, United Automotive Electronic Systems
Buyer's Guide
Cisco IOS Security vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
June 2025
Free Report: Cisco IOS Security vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco IOS Security vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Cisco IOS Security vs. Trellix Intrusion Prevention System report.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.