We performed a comparison between Chroma and Milvus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Meta, Chroma and others in Vector Databases."The solution's most valuable feature is its documentation, which allows new users to easily learn, deploy, and use it."
"The solution is well containerized, and since containerization is quick and easy for me, I can scale it up quickly."
"Milvus has good accuracy and performance."
"The best feature of Milvus was finding the closest chunk from a huge amount of data."
"I think Chroma doesn't have a ready-made containerized image available."
"Milvus has higher resource consumption, which introduces complexity in implementation."
"I've heard that when we store too much data in Milvus, it becomes slow and does not work properly."
"Milvus' documentation is not very user-friendly and doesn't help me get started quickly."
Earn 20 points
Chroma is ranked 3rd in Vector Databases with 1 review while Milvus is ranked 6th in Vector Databases with 3 reviews. Chroma is rated 8.0, while Milvus is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Chroma writes "Used for RAG (Retrieval-augmented generation) and provides good documentation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Milvus writes "Provides quick and easy containerization, but documentation is not very user-friendly". Chroma is most compared with Faiss, LanceDB, Redis, Qdrant and PostgreSQL, whereas Milvus is most compared with Elastic Search, Faiss, LanceDB, OpenSearch and Redis.
See our list of best Vector Databases vendors.
We monitor all Vector Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.