No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Check Point Web Gateway vs GoodAccess comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 4, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
5.1
Check Point Web Gateway delivers strong ROI by reducing costs, optimizing bandwidth, and enhancing security, earning high user ratings.
Sentiment score
7.3
GoodAccess provides quick ROI, with many users citing essential IT investment and time savings despite higher costs.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.1
Check Point's technical support receives mixed reviews for response times, expertise, and effectiveness, with varied user satisfaction levels.
Sentiment score
7.4
GoodAccess provides 24/7 responsive customer support with quick resolutions and effective communication, though occasional delays are noted.
Our organization has private engineers who are certified by Check Point.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Check Point Web Gateway offers robust scalability, outperforming legacy solutions and supporting growth with consistent performance and interoperability.
Sentiment score
8.1
GoodAccess is scalable and user-friendly, with adaptable licensing, though some desire improved gateway locations and bandwidth.
The cloud solution can be scalable, but in most cases, it is not because it is bound to specific firewalls.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Check Point Web Gateway is praised for stability, effectiveness in complex environments, and requires occasional updates for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
8.7
GoodAccess offers reliable, stable connectivity with minimal downtime, quick updates, and efficient support ensuring seamless user experiences.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Web Gateway needs better support, interface integration, update quality, documentation, cost adjustments, and scalability features.
GoodAccess should enhance features, flexibility, and support while addressing connection issues and expanding security measures.
Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
Check Point asks for the registered mail ID and number, which sometimes you can't quickly provide when under pressure because your client's network is down.
Customer Support Executive at simadrig
Deployment issues on Linux have been noted, especially with agents on endpoints.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
I would like to see more options and more granular controls for users who know what they are doing as an administrator.
Director, Information Technology at Veriheal
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Web Gateway is costly, requires evaluation and consultation, but discounts may align pricing with market standards.
GoodAccess offers competitive pricing with premium features, scalable for varied budgets, advising essential plans and monitoring annual costs.
The pricing and discounts for Check Point Web Gateway are similar to Fortinet, making it cost-effective with fair pricing.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web Gateway are similarly priced.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Web Gateway ensures robust security with cloud implementation, dynamic policies, threat intelligence, and easy maintenance for organizations.
GoodAccess provides secure, fast VPN services with global gateways, dedicated IPs, and easy administration for enhanced accessibility and collaboration.
It provides behavioral analysis and a Copilot feature implemented in the management console, allowing users to receive assistance in an automated format.
Key Executive at ITBiz Solutions
We are satisfied with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in Check Point Web Gateway.
Customer Support Executive at simadrig
We are using the real-time threat intelligence feature. It helps to manage web threats effectively with qualified alarms.
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
GoodAccess has positively impacted my organization as we have fewer IPs to whitelist and limited access for anybody outside of our organization into our internal systems.
Director, Information Technology at Veriheal
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Web Gateway
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GoodAccess
Ranking in Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
22nd
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (22nd), ZTNA (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Secure Web Gateways (SWG) category, the mindshare of Check Point Web Gateway is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoodAccess is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Check Point Web Gateway1.4%
GoodAccess0.9%
Other97.7%
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
 

Featured Reviews

KT
Senior Security Consultant at Orange Cyberdefense
Has improved threat visibility and centralized management but needs wider feature support
We have not worked much with granular control over web usage policies, so I cannot provide detailed feedback. We have not worked with the effectiveness of the multi-layered defense approach in threat prevention. Their product coverage is not as extensive as some competitors. They have fewer products and features compared to competitors. Support for operational technology (OT) is not as comprehensive in Check Point Web Gateway as it is in competing products.
Gytenis Borusas - PeerSpot reviewer
Director, Information Technology at Veriheal
Limits outside access and secures internal systems through straightforward setup
The best features GoodAccess offers are that it is very simple to use for users and very simple to set up for administrators.When I say it is simple to set up, I mean it has a simple interface with not many options to explore, and it is very straightforward.GoodAccess has positively impacted my organization as we have fewer IPs to whitelist and limited access for anybody outside of our organization into our internal systems.This has definitely increased security, but I do not have a measurable number to indicate how much it improved in percentage or absolute terms.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Web Gateways (SWG) solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
19%
Healthcare Company
14%
Construction Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business21
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise1
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Check Point Web Gateway?
It will be the same pricing as other solutions. Fortinet is the cheaper product, while Palo Alto and Check Point Web Gateway are similarly priced.
What needs improvement with Check Point Web Gateway?
As of now, I did not notice any significant areas for improvement. The interface of Check Point Web Gateway is far better than others and gives a complete and detailed manner of reports, which is v...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Web Gateway?
My main use case for Check Point Web Gateway was web filtering and application control. When I want to block social media, gambling websites, or any adult content, I use advanced web filtering in C...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoodAccess?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is straightforward; my colleague handled it, but the pricing is competitive and straightforward.
What needs improvement with GoodAccess?
GoodAccess can be improved by providing more editable options on the admin side.I would like to see more options and more granular controls for users who know what they are doing as an administrator.
What is your primary use case for GoodAccess?
My main use case for GoodAccess is to limit outside IPs, so we whitelist only one IP.I use GoodAccess for all our internal employees to connect to our internal systems, and they can do so only thro...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Morton Salt, Medical Advocacy and Outreach, BH Telecom, Lightbeam Health Solutions, X by Orange, Cadence, Nihondentsu, Datastream Connexion, Good Sam, Omnyway, FIASA, Pacific Life, Banco del Pacifico, Control Southern, Xero, Centrify, Tradair, Laterlite, Phoenix International, Unisinos, Wilkin Chapman, Connexus Energy, Mutua Universal, Smart & Final, Central New Mexico Community Colleg, Grupo Financiero Multiva
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Web Gateway vs. GoodAccess and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.