We performed a comparison between Check Point Infinity and Digital Guardian based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial implementation was accomplished easily and without deployment problems."
"Infinity has come to give us total protection."
"The product's excellent scalability features have allowed our organization to seamlessly adapt to the growing demand. The consensus mechanism and smart contract capabilities have optimized our workflow, resulting in an overall reduction in the complexity of our organization."
"The most valuable features of the solution stem from factors like ease of use, visibility, and cost to the enterprise."
"It provides fantastic visibility of security incidents through deconstructing and dissecting the threat's infection protocol."
"The sandblast threat emulation is great."
"It has come to reinforce the security architecture of the organization since it covers all the necessary pieces of security."
"New Check Point technologies can be found via this portal."
"It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability."
"Some of the features that are highly appreciated are its robust data loss prevention capabilities, flexible deployment options, and the ability to monitor data transfer across multiple vectors."
"The technical support is really terrific."
"It has the added advantage of offering forensic analysis."
"We have been able to monitor access to files from each of our workstations."
"There is a built-in endpoint detection response that helps save money."
"It has been scalable."
"The feature we call desktop recording is the most valuable aspect of the solution. Not only can we collect data from the user's usage, but we also capture his screenshots when he is trying to steal the data."
"I think that the pricing for the Check Point products should be reconsidered, as we found it to be quite expensive to purchase and to maintain."
"The endpoint solutions offered by Check Point are not prominent enough in the market due to Check Point's poor marketing efforts."
"The portal is provisioned in AWS. They should improve the cloud to make it faster."
"We'd like to see support for fiber connections."
"In the future, I would like to see new developments that allow us to centralize the cloud."
"The management console has given us some trouble, and the documentation is a little bit rigid in its solution paths."
"Technical support is something that needs improvement."
"It seems that the performance varies, likely influenced by the client's size and the provisioning of resources."
"Technical support could be better."
"The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel."
"When considering potential areas for improvement, it may be beneficial for Digital Guardian to optimize its processes and reduce the computational demands on the system, particularly with regard to high CPU usage. Although Digital Guardian offers numerous benefits, it can consume a substantial amount of RAM and CPU power."
"I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated."
"There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great."
"The initial setup is a bit more complex than other solutions."
"Some features on Mac and Linux are not complete currently. For example, some device control features haven't been transferred over to the other systems. If they could have their Windows features also available on Mac and Linux, that would be perfect. Some of our customers have a Mac environment for their RD environment. Having the solution fully capable of handling everything in a Mac environment is crucial."
"The solution has complexities around policy creation and deployment."
Check Point Infinity is ranked 13th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 20 reviews while Digital Guardian is ranked 20th in ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) with 11 reviews. Check Point Infinity is rated 8.8, while Digital Guardian is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Infinity writes "Provides robust cybersecurity with a comprehensive suite of features, expert support, and scalable cloud-based architecture, ensuring effective threat detection and continuous improvement ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital Guardian writes "Highly customizable, helpful support, and multiple modules available". Check Point Infinity is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Proofpoint Email Protection, whereas Digital Guardian is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Check Point Infinity vs. Digital Guardian report.
See our list of best ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) vendors.
We monitor all ATP (Advanced Threat Protection) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.