Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and WatchGuard are both solutions in the Anti-Malware Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while WatchGuard is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.0. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in Anti-Malware Tools, compared to WatchGuard’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WatchGuard users who would recommend it.
Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Read 59 Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reviews
  • 326 Views
  • 160 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus
Read 5 WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus reviews
  • 229 Views
  • 169 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus and Check Point Harmony SASE are both in the network security space. Check Point Harmony SASE seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive security suite and robust features, which may justify its higher price for some buyers.

Features: WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus focuses on threat detection, easy integration, and specialized antivirus protection. It is notable for its scalability and effective non-encrypted traffic analysis. Check Point Harmony SASE includes Zero Trust Network Access, integration with Citrix SD-WAN for remote implementation, and advanced SAML integration, making it a versatile solution for comprehensive security needs.

Room for Improvement: WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus could benefit from enhanced encrypted traffic inspection, more intuitive user guides for new features, and a wider range of security tools. Check Point Harmony SASE might improve through more streamlined VPN configuration, additional user tutorials for better feature exploration, and reduced complexity in initial setup for smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus offers an easy deployment process and solid customer service, making it suitable for enterprises needing quick setup. Check Point Harmony SASE provides seamless deployment and proactive support, enhancing the user experience for those who prioritize ongoing service.

Pricing and ROI: WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus is cost-effective, offering a good ROI for businesses focused on antivirus capabilities. It is fairly priced outside of the Chinese market. Check Point Harmony SASE involves a steeper initial investment but promises significant ROI through its broad feature set, benefiting enterprises that need extensive security measures.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
7th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
59
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (5th), Firewalls (16th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (4th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (7th)
WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus is 0.3%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer8099174 - PeerSpot reviewer
Secure access with an intuitive design and straightforward controls
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options with a broader range of third-party tools would be beneficial for seamless compatibility with various existing systems. As for additional features in the next release, it would be great to see advanced threat detection and response capabilities integrated into the platform. This would further enhance security by proactively identifying and mitigating potential threats. Additionally, improved mobile device management features and more comprehensive user behavior analytics would be valuable additions to meet evolving cybersecurity needs.
Read full review
PA
Reasonably priced and simple to use
During the product's installation phase, you just put the tool in the right place, and it works. The solution is deployed on an on-premises model. The solution can be deployed in a couple of minutes. The installation process is so basic that I don't even remember what you need to do. You just put the tick marks in the tool and ask the tool to use them. In the rules, where you see the files go through is where you can think over what to do with the files. With the tool, you just need to put it on, and then the default rules make sure that there is some indication that something is wrong.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Scaling Perimeter 81 was easy to do."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Now that we use Harmony Connect, the files are inspected and we are sure that no malicious content is inside the company."
"The application control and granular access feature are very easy to use, intuitive, and effective."
"The solution offers ATP features and management features."
"The characteristics that I have liked the most are the ease of implementation and administration."
"Providing access and security allows our company employees to work from home and remotely."
"The Check Point portfolio showcases very strong products."
More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pros
"The pricing of the solution is okay. It's not the most expensive option."
"It does its job very well, and it is quite easy to put to use."
"I haven't a problem with anti-virus stability using WatchGuard for over two years."
"It is the most effective on non-encrypted traffic and it is able to determine some threats through deep packet inspection."
"WatchGuard is easy to implement and inexpensive. When we get a bulk-off license, we get a very discounted price that is competitive with alternative or competitor solutions."
 

Cons

"The complex initial setup phase of the product is an area that can be improved"
"One of the more negative experiences using Perimeter 81 is the fact that I am logged off after a pre-determined amount of time which cuts off access to some of my company's resources."
"There is an issue when installing the Check Point client."
"The support is not very good."
"The product needs to work on the integration of alerts with different SIEM or security solutions."
"The suspend feature needs more control."
"In mobile devices, there is also sometimes a bit of tear when it is via LTE, however, that must be due to connectivity."
"When it comes to firewall configuration, sometimes we encounter issues."
More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) cons
"The solution isn't what I would consider feature-rich."
"It doesn't offer the best protection and it's incompatible with a lot of China's websites. It makes a lot of mistakes when it is detecting items as it's not recognizing items correctly."
"Since WatchGuard acquired Panda, there may be synergies in consolidating both solutions under a single name to reduce customer confusion."
"WatchGuard technical support requires a license."
"There were a little bit of problems with the tool's updates, making it an area where improvements are needed."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Perimeter 81 charges separately for gateways and VPN connectivity, but compared to Azure, it seemed more reasonable."
"The cost of the solution's licenses depends on the particular use cases."
"The pricing of Check Point is relatively high when compared to other competitors like Palo Alto and Fortinet. While Palo Alto may be on the higher side in terms of cost, Check Point's pricing is similar to that of Fortinet. In some cases, Check Point offers better value for the features it provides. We initially considered other options but ultimately decided to purchase hardware that came with three years of iOS. This approach eliminated the need for any additional costs associated with Check Point. I would rate it 10 out of 10."
"I consider the product to be a medium-priced solution. There are no additional costs attached to the tool."
"The pricing is good, especially when you compare it to other firewall or UTM solutions from FortiGate or SonicWall, where you would have to invest about four hundred thousand rupees for 100 users over a three-year period."
"The product is neither cheap nor expensive."
"Overall I am very happy with the solution’s flexibility and pricing."
"The solution's pricing model may not be suitable for smaller companies, as they might find it expensive. Larger companies tend to receive more value due to many users."
More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) pricing and cost advice
"For what we use, the tool's price has been reasonable, but it is not the cheapest. The tool has been quite reasonable."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...
See all answers
What needs improvement with WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus?
It is a basic tool tool, and it does very well for what it is supposed to do. It does simple checks against signatures. I think it is very much what it needs to be, and it is a basic tool that you ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus?
The solution is used when you want to handle policies with the file. There are different ways you can use it, like in the firewall rules and in proxy rules, and to secure emails. The tool was used ...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus?
It is the basic starting tool. We used different tools in the company. In our gateway, we used WatchGuard because we used WatchGuard's firewalls. It was very easy to set it up. It was used so that ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 15% of the time
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 13% of the time
Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Netskope vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 9% of the time
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 9% of the time
Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Logo
Cisco Umbrella vs Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Compared 7% of the time
More Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) Competitors
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus
Compared 100% of the time
More WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
May 2025
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) reportDownload Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) product report
Buyer's Guide
Anti-Malware Tools
January 2025
WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus reportDownload WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus product report
 

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE
No data available
 

Overview

Perimeter 81 is a cloud-based network security and software-defined perimeter (SDP) solution designed to provide secure access to resources in the cloud, data centers, and on-premises environments. It offers a unified platform for organizations to manage and secure their network infrastructure, regardless of the location or type of resources.  

Perimeter 81 Benefits:

  • Easy to use
  • Flexible access policies
  • Strong encryption and authentication protocols
  • Scalable
  • Compatible with various devices and platforms

Perimeter 81 Features:

  • Secure Network Access: Perimeter 81 provides secure access to internal resources and cloud-based applications through its client applications and gateways.
  • Software-Defined Perimeter (SDP): SDP is a security framework that focuses on dynamically creating secure connections between users and resources on a need-to-know basis. 
  • Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA): Perimeter 81 follows the Zero Trust security model, which assumes that no user or device can be inherently trusted. 
  • Multi-Cloud and Hybrid Cloud Support: Perimeter 81 is designed to secure access to resources across multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments.
  • User and Device Management: The solution offers centralized user and device management capabilities, allowing administrators to define access policies, manage user roles, and enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for enhanced security. 
  • Network Segmentation: Perimeter 81 enables organizations to segment their network resources, creating isolated environments based on logical groupings. 
  • Centralized Management and Analytics: Perimeter 81 provides a centralized management console where administrators can configure and monitor their network security settings.

Reviews from Real Users

PeerSpot user, Frontend Developer at Limelight Networks, states that "We use some VPN solutions, and Perimeter 81 has the best user experience for desktop or mobile".

Daniel Goldfeld, Vice President of Customer Success at Mine - The All-in-One Privacy Suite, says that Perimeter 81 has "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions".

Another PeerSpot user, Accounts Payable Specialist at Simera, writes that "The feature that I have found to be most valuable is the reputation that the company has regarding privacy. Nowadays, this is critical, especially when you do all of your work online."

    Check Point Software Technologies

    Keeping your network free of malware is more challenging than ever before as an increasing number of new and ever-changing threats are emerging each day. Ensure your network and devices remain free of malware with WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus. It uses advanced, multi-layered threat detection engines to identify and block malware at the network gateway. Using industry-leading, high-performance scanning of traffic on all major protocols, WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus provides real-time protection against known viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, and rogueware.

    WatchGuard
     

    Sample Customers

    Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
    Star Cargo
    Buyer's Guide
    Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus
    April 2025
    Free Report: Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus
    Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    See our Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. WatchGuard Gateway AntiVirus report.
    See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.