We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and SentinelOne based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Based on the parameters we compared, SentinelOne seems to be a slightly superior solution. All other things being more or less equal, our reviewers found Check Point Harmony Endpoint to be expensive.
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The stability is very good."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"We have found the stability to be very reliable."
"The reporting feature where we can see and monitor what happened on our client computers is useful."
"We're able to secure all endpoints and manage them from a single console."
"When sending emails to my colleagues, it detects any virus and blocks any spam that may be shared."
"I have found the Zero phishing and IPS features the most useful in Check Point Harmony Endpoint. Additionally, threat emulation sandboxing is effective."
"One of the coolest features is that it provides an HTML report on the laptop and the endpoint console for the administrator."
"The solution has all the standard features you would expect for endpoint protection."
"Cost-wise it's cheaper than other options."
"The autonomous platform is valuable because we can separate false positives and negatives."
"Its ability to interact with other third-party tools has been great for us. It can work through APIs and partners and integrate well."
"The process visualization, automated response, and snapshotting are valuable. The integration and automation possibilities are also valuable."
"It protects your machine, and it does an excellent job using AI to determine an attack and stop the attack. Its most powerful feature is prevention, and it can unwind ransomware activity as well. So, it is a really useful product in that sense."
"It provides network and asset visibility for us."
"I find the application inventory feature to be extremely useful."
"We find the solution to be scalable."
"I like that SentinelOne doesn't use a lot of system resources or make the system slow. It also performs a full scan quickly—within two hours. It has an easy-to-use end-user GUI."
"The solution is not stable."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The EDR console should have more extensive reporting. You shouldn't need to purchase FortiAnalyzer. It should be included in the EDR part. The security adviser cloud platform could be improved with more options for exclusive or intensive rules for devices."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"Unfortunately, the web (cloud) management system and log search performance are quite bad."
"It would be useful if you could also mark blocks as safe from a client. Now users always have to ask an admin to make exclusions."
"I would like to see more automation."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint's agent is a bit heavy."
"Sometimes the portal loads slowly which should be improved."
"The web filter service could be improved."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint could improve by allowing it to work on older systems by reducing the system requirements. Since our systems are dated we can only use the antivirus module features."
"Check Point Harmony Endpoint could improve mobile device management (MDM)."
"I'd like to see more documentation."
"I would like to see a better control panel for the managed service side of it."
"We did use the Ranger functionality. However, there was some scanning going on and it caused a lot of noise, so we had to disable it."
"SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price."
"We need to analyze the threats and make decisions based on that, so the analytics could be better at analyzing exactly where the threats are coming from."
"The only concern we have is that there are a few features that were not readily available."
"The previous vendor had a lot more features and capabilities under the license. For example, I lost DLP as Sentinel One does not have DLP."
"Native integration with the mobile console is an area that can be improved."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 7th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 47 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 88 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.6, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Resilient by design, provides redundancy, and offers ongoing constant improvements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Worth the money, supports legacy endpoints, and blocks anything even remotely malicious". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Symantec Endpoint Security, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Intercept X Endpoint and Cynet. See our Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors and best EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.