We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and Trellix DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."
"Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."
"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."
"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."
"The data center security system has provided real-time analytics on performance and data configuration processes."
"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."
"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."
"Check Point CloudGuard Code Security helps to improve the code security of our company, generating rapid and complete assessments to be able to make decisions for improvements."
"The tool has prebuilt templates for data classification. It is easier for customers to get started."
"Scalability is feasible since it's on-premises. It's easy to scale there."
"It prevents enterprises from installing external software and devices and can block specific network pathways."
"Trellix can transfer the data through the cloud. The storage device control is an important feature."
"The costs are not transparent."
"It is generally difficult to find documentation about the product, and there is relatively little to find."
"The ease of use could be better."
"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."
"I would like this solution to be extended to cellular devices or tablets."
"I am satisfied with the performance and results enhanced by this product since we deployed it."
"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."
"There needs to be better security around API integration."
"The whole UI of the server console installed on the standalone computers is hefty."
"In future releases, I would like to see like to see encryption available on the cloud-based version."
"Trellix needs to improve customer support."
"Trellix is incompatible with Linux, and its DLP part is incompatible with Mac. Sometimes, it does not work on Windows, either."
More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 11th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 11 reviews while Trellix DLP is ranked 21st in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 4 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4, while Trellix DLP is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix DLP writes "Comes in a single console: Emission, endpoint security, everything in one product, one agent". Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Snyk, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas Trellix DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector. See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. Trellix DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.