We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and GitGuardian Public Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."
"We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities."
"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."
"Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning."
"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."
"Check Point CloudGuard Code Security helps to improve the code security of our company, generating rapid and complete assessments to be able to make decisions for improvements."
"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."
"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."
"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."
"One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."
"The costs are not transparent."
"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."
"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."
"It is generally difficult to find documentation about the product, and there is relatively little to find."
"This is a highly technical solution for users who do not have security experience. It requires specialized knowledge of configurations to use it correctly."
"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."
"The enhancements are needed in the logging system and log management processes."
"I would like this solution to be extended to cellular devices or tablets."
"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers."
More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 11th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 11 reviews while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 17th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4, while GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Snyk, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk. See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. GitGuardian Public Monitoring report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
