Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CGI Data Center Outsourcing vs Data Centers Canada Data Center Outsourcing comparison

CGI and TeraGo are both solutions in the Data Center Outsourcing (Canada) category. CGI is ranked #3, while TeraGo is ranked #6. CGI holds a 11.5% mindshare in DCOC, compared to TeraGo’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of TeraGo users are willing to recommend the solution.
CGI Data Center Outsourcing
  • 48 Views
  • 7 Comparison Views
Data Centers Canada Data Ce...
  • 33 Views
  • 3 Comparison Views

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CGI Data Center Outsourcing
Ranking in Data Center Outsourcing (Canada)
3rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Data Center Outsourcing (USA) (13th)
Data Centers Canada Data Ce...
Ranking in Data Center Outsourcing (Canada)
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Data Center Outsourcing (Canada) category, the mindshare of CGI Data Center Outsourcing is 11.5%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Data Centers Canada Data Center Outsourcing is 1.9%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Center Outsourcing (Canada)
 

Comparisons

No data available
No data available
 

Sample Customers

Conexus Credit Union, Interac Association, Saskatchewan Health
Global Insurance Provider, North American E-Health Provider, Government Agency
See our list of best Data Center Outsourcing (Canada) vendors.

We monitor all Data Center Outsourcing (Canada) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.