Centreon vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Centreon and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.3, while Kovai.co is ranked #35. Centreon holds a 2.4% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kovai.co’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,080 Views
4,767 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

3,958 Views
1,187 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Turbo360 are competing products in the network and application monitoring category. Centreon appears to have the upper hand in affordability and support, while Turbo360 stands out with comprehensive features valued by users.

Features: Centreon provides powerful network monitoring tools, visual dashboards, and real-time alerts. Turbo360 includes serverless architecture management, extensive integration options, and sophisticated observability capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon uses a straightforward on-premise deployment suitable for large-scale environments, paired with proactive customer support. Turbo360 offers cloud-based deployment, providing flexibility but requiring more intensive setup for integration. Customers value Turbo360 for responsiveness, whereas Centreon is preferred for its simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is praised for competitive pricing and strong ROI for traditional infrastructures, emphasizing cost-effectiveness. Turbo360 involves higher upfront costs due to its extensive features but provides substantial long-term ROI in cloud-native implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,894 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th)

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

35th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (62nd), Cloud Management (47th), Cloud Cost Management (30th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 2.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	2.4%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)	1.0%
Other	96.6%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

reviewer1868589

Python Engineer at Msys Technologies

Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits

Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications. One more thing to note is that their support team was always ready to clear all our doubts regarding the product but we feel that it would be much appreciated if they could share with us the required resources to get new customers like us well-versed in traversing through different modules of the product. These are the very few areas where Serverless360 can be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"We have everything we need with the product."

"The most valuable feature is that we can manually configure everything we need. After it comes inside the interface of Centreon, you can display it. Because the interface is quite user-friendly, you can manually configure the configuration very deeply, which is very pleasant and useful because you can monitor and see everything on your service list, dashboard, or MAP. The most useful feature for me is that you can create your own plugin and monitoring query."

"E-mail alert notifications are valuable."

"Centreon helps me detect where the problem is quickly. When we resolve a problem quickly, this lowers our overall costs."

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"Centreon is one of our core tools and if we didn't have it, we couldn't do our job effectively."

More Centreon pros

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"That is exactly where Serverless360 helped us by bringing in both Service Bus management and monitoring under the same hood."

"Serverless360 transformed the way our organizations manage Azure and hybrid integrations."

Cons

"Improvements I would like to see include a discovery solution, better reports, and end-to-end monitoring."

"Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed."

"The scalability of Centreon is very bad because of the nature of the software."

"Centreon is actually missing an easy way to create a trendline for the metrics. Actually it is possible to create it, but you need a good knowledge of math, Centreon, and RRD."

"Currently, we have to go through all of the different templates and take a look at how the template is configured, and how specific parameters may change across different templates with different precedents, megatons, etc. It's a lot of work and involves trial and error. I wish they could simplify the process."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours."

"Opening a ticket on the website of Centreon can be difficult for my colleague, but not for me because my English is good. However, my colleague doesn't speak English well, as our company is in Quebec and our first language is French."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

More Centreon cons

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"I think Centreon's pricing is fair, especially given the criticality of our system. They were cheaper than the other solutions. The licensing terms were pretty straightforward. I believe it was based on the number of hosts."

"Open-source solutions like this can be very cost effective for an organization looking for a product that they can quickly implement, as there is no initial cost and there are no license renewal fees. However, it is important to take into consideration some of the related costs that may come along as needed, such as training, support, and product enhancements."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

Harness vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

June 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2026

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Serverless360

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Turbo360, previously known as Serverless360, provides advanced capabilities for managing distributed systems efficiently, catering to a knowledgeable audience seeking streamlined operations and enhanced performance.

Turbo360 offers a comprehensive suite designed to support businesses in tracking and managing complex distributed applications. It equips professionals with essential tools to simplify the intricate processes of application integration and monitoring, ensuring seamless operational functionality. Targeting a tech-savvy audience, Turbo360 enhances oversight and control over application processes, optimizing resource use and fault detection.

What are the key features of Turbo360?

Integration Tracking: Monitors data flow across applications.
Error Management: Detects and resolves system issues swiftly.
Performance Monitoring: Provides insights into application efficiency.
Resource Optimization: Streamlines resource allocation for better performance.

Why choose Turbo360?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with optimized resource use.
Improved Performance: Enhances application speed and reliability.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with ease.

Industries implementing Turbo360, specifically in finance and healthcare, benefit from its robust tracking and monitoring abilities, improving service delivery and resource management. Its adaptability makes it a preferred choice for organizations focusing on innovation and digital transformation.

Kovai.co

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

June 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.