Centreon vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) comparison

Centreon and Kovai.co are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3, while Kovai.co is ranked #36. Centreon holds a 2.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Kovai.co’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Kovai.co users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
4,870 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Read 2 Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) reviews

4,421 Views
1,282 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Turbo360 are competing products in the network and application monitoring category. Centreon appears to have the upper hand in affordability and support, while Turbo360 stands out with comprehensive features valued by users.

Features: Centreon provides powerful network monitoring tools, visual dashboards, and real-time alerts. Turbo360 includes serverless architecture management, extensive integration options, and sophisticated observability capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon uses a straightforward on-premise deployment suitable for large-scale environments, paired with proactive customer support. Turbo360 offers cloud-based deployment, providing flexibility but requiring more intensive setup for integration. Customers value Turbo360 for responsiveness, whereas Centreon is preferred for its simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is praised for competitive pricing and strong ROI for traditional infrastructures, emphasizing cost-effectiveness. Turbo360 involves higher upfront costs due to its extensive features but provides substantial long-term ROI in cloud-native implementations.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th)

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverle...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

36th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (66th), Cloud Management (47th), Cloud Cost Management (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 2.3%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	2.3%
Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)	1.0%
Other	96.7%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

reviewer1868589

Python Engineer at Msys Technologies

Great topic subscription monitoring, helpful management, and useful for audits

Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications. One more thing to note is that their support team was always ready to clear all our doubts regarding the product but we feel that it would be much appreciated if they could share with us the required resources to get new customers like us well-versed in traversing through different modules of the product. These are the very few areas where Serverless360 can be improved.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is available in ISO image format, ready for deployment. Centreon also has a comprehensive guide and documentation that are simple and easy to follow."

"Centreon enables us to proactively take action on issues before they even become incidents, which significantly reduces business disruptions resulting from controllable factors."

"Centreon is a really capable tool that increases efficiency and gives you more information."

"My advice would be to go ahead with Centreon; don't waste time, go ahead."

"For servers and for applications, it was very, very efficient."

"You can concentrate and orchestrate several other solutions from other vendors. You can consolidate those solutions all in one place, then maintain and monitor from that single point. This creates ease of use. It is a very powerful solution from this point of view."

"The downtimes feature is helpful. If the ISP is doing some maintenance on its network, we have the option to put downtime on the devices or the services, so we won't get any false alarms."

"Centreon's user-friendly dashboard and minimal resource requirements lead to significant time and cost savings."

More Centreon pros

"Serverless360 transformed the way our organizations manage Azure and hybrid integrations."

"Service Bus topic subscription monitoring turned out to be the most useful for us."

"That is exactly where Serverless360 helped us by bringing in both Service Bus management and monitoring under the same hood."

"It offers all the core capabilities we need to manage and monitor our Azure services."

Cons

"There are times when we face issues with Centreon being in development mode. Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received."

"Now that we got it, I haven't had time to work on it since it is a paid solution that is quite expensive."

"This solution lacks service monitoring in the cloud."

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

"I would like to see an improvement of the communication with big data systems, because Centreon is a monitoring system. In our point of view, Centreon should be a part of a source for a big data system, not a big data system itself. So, it should be easier to add data from the Centreon system to a big data system. For example, it should be able to teach machine learning."

"Improvements are needed in the area of cloud monitoring, as that's a newer feature."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

"I went through a few things with them to do with Centreon MAP, to do with active polygons, being able to draw an area and make that active. The functionality was in the older version of Centreon MAP and in the new version, which was a complete rewrite, they dropped it."

More Centreon cons

"The user interface of Serveress360 could be improved a bit to make the platform even easier to use."

"Addition of more monitoring features to Azure Cosmos DB can be a huge help as we use the same as the main database for our applications."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

CAST AI vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

Harness vs Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Compared 4% of the time

More Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2026

Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report

Download Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Serverless360

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Turbo360, previously known as Serverless360, provides advanced capabilities for managing distributed systems efficiently, catering to a knowledgeable audience seeking streamlined operations and enhanced performance.

Turbo360 offers a comprehensive suite designed to support businesses in tracking and managing complex distributed applications. It equips professionals with essential tools to simplify the intricate processes of application integration and monitoring, ensuring seamless operational functionality. Targeting a tech-savvy audience, Turbo360 enhances oversight and control over application processes, optimizing resource use and fault detection.

What are the key features of Turbo360?

Integration Tracking: Monitors data flow across applications.
Error Management: Detects and resolves system issues swiftly.
Performance Monitoring: Provides insights into application efficiency.
Resource Optimization: Streamlines resource allocation for better performance.

Why choose Turbo360?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs with optimized resource use.
Improved Performance: Enhances application speed and reliability.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs with ease.

Industries implementing Turbo360, specifically in finance and healthcare, benefit from its robust tracking and monitoring abilities, improving service delivery and resource management. Its adaptability makes it a preferred choice for organizations focusing on innovation and digital transformation.

Kovai.co

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

MSC, Transalta, Rank Group, RACQ, BBC, Q2 Solutions, Middleway, BUPA, Columbia Sportswear, EDF

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

August 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360)

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Turbo360 (Formerly Serverless360) report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.