Centreon vs Riverbed NPM+ comparison

Centreon and Riverbed are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while Riverbed is ranked #45 with an average rating of 9.0. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Riverbed’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Riverbed users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
6,835 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Riverbed NPM+

Read 2 Riverbed NPM+ reviews

2,122 Views
1,846 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Riverbed NPM+

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Centreon and Riverbed NPM+ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Riverbed NPM+ Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Riverbed NPM+

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th)

Riverbed NPM+

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

45th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Riverbed NPM+ is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
Riverbed NPM+	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Satyam Kumar

Senior Technical Engineer at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

Provides deep packet visibility for tracing failed transactions and helps improve enterprise-level monitoring

Many improvements are needed for Riverbed NPM+, particularly in NetIM, which does not perform as well as SolarWinds' single module NPM solution. Additionally, within Riverbed Portal, there is an Application Map module that could be improved. It can show the application's architecture and connectivity to the network. The applications map feature needs enhancements for better customization since currently, it is quite limited. The enhancements I recommend are not for the entire Riverbed product suite, but specifically for the application map feature within the Portal of Riverbed NPM+. This Portal is one of the dashboard modules and while there is potential for improvement, it must be enhanced significantly to provide better functionality. Currently, you cannot trace by transaction number alone; knowing the source and destination IP is necessary. For instance, if I transfer money and a transaction fails, tracing that transaction ID is not captured in AppResponse. I have raised this concern, and if this feature is implemented, it would greatly benefit banking customers, especially because it is not available with their competitors either.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a great product, it's very flexible."

"Centreon is one of our core tools and if we didn't have it, we couldn't do our job effectively."

"I can't point to one valuable feature. All of Centreon is good."

"It supports active monitoring so we don't have to use traps. From time to time traps are not very useful because we never know if they are actually working or not. The reporting part is also valuable as are the event logs. Using them we can check right away if something has had a hiccup."

"The most important feature is that it permits us to receive alarms if there is an incident within the infrastructure. The feature I love the most is the reporting feature, the MBI (Monitoring Business Intelligence) which permits us to send advanced reports to our customers in PDF format or in Doc format. We also deploy Centreon Map which gives our customers intuitive views of their information system."

"We have the business activity monitoring, the map, and the MBI modules and they are all very good."

"Once everything is set up correctly, it reduces our MTTR by 50 percent."

"When we started to work with Centreon, there were about 30 people in our company and now there are 90 people, so our company has been growing and growing with Centreon."

More Centreon pros

"Alluvio Network Performance Management is good for troubleshooting."

"Riverbed NPM+ provides a holistic view of the network and deeper insights into traffic and packet analysis."

Cons

"During the initial setup we faced some issues. Part of it was because we had to become more knowledgeable in the solution. There are some gray areas and if you don't know the product well you may have issues. Another part of it was some bugs that we came across, although that's part of every software solution in IT nowadays. But the initial setup could be easier."

"Centreon is very bad with auto-scanning. It's very monolithic software. It doesn't have microservices and it only has basic clustering. You cannot, for example, have six or seven nodes for Centreon's cloud processes."

"I would like to see an improvement of the communication with big data systems, because Centreon is a monitoring system. In our point of view, Centreon should be a part of a source for a big data system, not a big data system itself. So, it should be easier to add data from the Centreon system to a big data system. For example, it should be able to teach machine learning."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

"I think Centreon's security could be improved by leveraging AI. That's where things are heading in the industry."

"Release management and quality of testing need improvement, because with each major upgrade we have many issues coming in. Then, it takes several minor upgrades to get rid of them."

More Centreon cons

"Currently, you cannot trace by transaction number alone; knowing the source and destination IP is necessary."

"Many improvements are needed for Riverbed NPM+, particularly in NetIM, which does not perform as well as SolarWinds' single module NPM solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Open-source solutions like this can be very cost effective for an organization looking for a product that they can quickly implement, as there is no initial cost and there are no license renewal fees. However, it is important to take into consideration some of the related costs that may come along as needed, such as training, support, and product enhancements."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The tool's pricing is high and I would rate it one out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Alluvio Network Performance Management?

The pricing of Riverbed NPM+ is indeed high, particularly as I work with enterprises in the banking sector primarily in India and the Middle East, and I have also interacted with clients in Europe....

See all answers

What needs improvement with Alluvio Network Performance Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Alluvio Network Performance Management?

Riverbed NPM+ has many primary use cases, making this NPM solution totally different from other tools like SolarWinds. They have a solution called AppResponse, which is not an agent-based solution ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Datadog vs Riverbed NPM+

Compared 14% of the time

NETSCOUT InfiniStreamNG vs Riverbed NPM+

Compared 12% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Riverbed NPM+

Compared 8% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Riverbed NPM+

Compared 7% of the time

LiveNX vs Riverbed NPM+

Compared 6% of the time

More Riverbed NPM+ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download Riverbed NPM+ product report

Also Known As

No data available

Alluvio Network Performance Management

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Riverbed NPM+ offers comprehensive network performance monitoring tailored for complex IT environments, providing insights and tools to optimize network efficiency and user experience.

Designed for IT professionals, Riverbed NPM+ delivers granular visibility into network activities, allowing for precise traffic analysis and performance metrics. This enables enterprises to troubleshoot and resolve issues swiftly. With scalable features, it supports seamless integration with large infrastructures, ensuring continuous network health and performance.

What are the key features of Riverbed NPM+?

Deep Packet Inspection: Enables detailed analysis of network traffic for improved diagnostics.
Application Performance Monitoring: Tracks application metrics to enhance operations and delivery.
Scalability: Supports extensive networks, adapting to the needs of growing enterprises.
Custom Reporting: Offers tailored insights and reporting for effective decision-making.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Riverbed NPM+?

Improved Network Efficiency: Optimize network performance, reducing downtime and disruptions.
Cost Savings: Minimize resource wastage and manage network expenditures effectively.
Enhanced User Experience: Deliver consistent and reliable network performance, catering to user demands.
Informed Decision Making: Leverage accurate data for better IT strategy and planning.

Riverbed NPM+ is utilized across industries such as finance, healthcare, and education, where network reliability and speed are critical. In finance, it ensures rapid transaction processing; in healthcare, it supports the operation of medical systems; and in education, it maintains connectivity for online learning platforms.

Riverbed

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Riverbed NPM+

August 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Riverbed NPM+

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Riverbed NPM+ and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Riverbed NPM+ report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.