Centreon vs NetFort LANGuardian comparison

Centreon and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while Rapid7 is ranked #94. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Rapid7’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
6,835 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

NetFort LANGuardian

Read 2 NetFort LANGuardian reviews

1,401 Views
1,247 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

NetFort LANGuardian

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

NetFort LANGuardian and Centreon compete in the network monitoring and management category. Centreon has the upper hand due to its robust feature set that provides comprehensive network monitoring capabilities.

Features: NetFort LANGuardian provides deep packet inspection, traffic analysis, and detailed network visibility. Centreon offers extensive monitoring capabilities, scalability, and integration with third-party tools.

Room for Improvement: NetFort LANGuardian could improve its scalability, interface, and integration options. Centreon may enhance its ease of use, deployment time, and offer more flexible pricing models.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon's deployment is noted for scalability and flexibility, providing strong support for complex environments. NetFort LANGuardian offers a straightforward deployment process with responsive support for traditional network setups.

Pricing and ROI: NetFort LANGuardian's competitive setup cost delivers ROI through efficient traffic analysis and monitoring solutions. Centreon's higher setup cost is justified by its extensive scope and features that enhance long-term ROI through robust network management.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. NetFort LANGuardian Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NetFort LANGuardian

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (21st)

NetFort LANGuardian

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

94th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetFort LANGuardian is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
NetFort LANGuardian	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

it_user172854

Research Special Projects Lead at a university with 501-1,000 employees

Cost effective but when we originally purchased LANGuardian, some features needed further development.

The ability to detect and decipher torrent traffic for the purpose of identifying what some refer to as "copyright violators" Our CIO asked us to track down the source of undesired uploads, which trigger e-mails received by outside bodies regarding what they refer to as "copyright violations",…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of servers and networks, because we have a lot of them and need to maintain control."

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

"The product is available in ISO image format, ready for deployment. Centreon also has a comprehensive guide and documentation that are simple and easy to follow."

"We have the business activity monitoring, the map, and the MBI modules and they are all very good."

"The customizable reports and dashboards are really flexible. We started this partnership with Centreon, when we were looking for a solution, because of the flexibility of the reporting. That's what we found to be most attractive in the solution. You can display the data as you want."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"I find the product's scalability to be one of the most valuable features since it allows us to add unlimited devices for monitoring and to set up additional polling servers without additional license cost or downtime in our monitoring."

More Centreon pros

"Our CIO asked us to track down the source of undesired uploads, which trigger e-mails received by outside bodies regarding what they refer to as "copyright violations", and Languardian was the most efficient and effective tool for the job."

"If you are looking for a solid solution that can be easily deployed then I'd recommend considering Netfort solutions."

Cons

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"I would like to see an improvement of the communication with big data systems, because Centreon is a monitoring system. In our point of view, Centreon should be a part of a source for a big data system, not a big data system itself. So, it should be easier to add data from the Centreon system to a big data system. For example, it should be able to teach machine learning."

"There are improvements that they need to make to their API. When we're using different systems and we want to disable monitoring for a specific server, we still can't do that through the API. That's something that's lacking."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

"Centreon is actually missing an easy way to create a trendline for the metrics. Actually it is possible to create it, but you need a good knowledge of math, Centreon, and RRD."

"This solution lacks service monitoring in the cloud."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems."

More Centreon cons

"Sure, at the time we bought the product, the GUI and graphs/reports/pie charts etc ... were not fully developed."

"It takes a long time to load results. I think it would be great if they fix the slowness issue in the next release."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

TruView vs NetFort LANGuardian

Compared 20% of the time

Obkio vs NetFort LANGuardian

Compared 18% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs NetFort LANGuardian

Compared 15% of the time

Darktrace vs NetFort LANGuardian

Compared 8% of the time

Sensu vs NetFort LANGuardian

Compared 7% of the time

More NetFort LANGuardian Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2026

Download NetFort LANGuardian product report

Also Known As

No data available

LANGuardian

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

NetFort LANGuardian provides deep packet inspection for network and user activity monitoring. It's tailored for IT professionals who require comprehensive visibility and forensic-level insights into their network traffic.

Designed for real-time visibility, NetFort LANGuardian efficiently monitors network behavior by capturing and analyzing traffic data. Its intuitive dashboard allows easy access to complex data, offering detailed insights across all network layers. By leveraging passive packet capture technology, it minimizes network impact while delivering accurate analytics. This approach ensures IT teams can diagnose issues, optimize performance, and enhance security with confidence.

What are the most important features of NetFort LANGuardian?

Deep Packet Inspection: Provides granular analysis of network traffic for forensic investigations.
User Activity Monitoring: Tracks user actions to ensure compliance and security.
Bandwidth Usage Reporting: Offers detailed reports on bandwidth consumption across the network.
Application Traffic Monitoring: Identifies and categorizes applications in use to optimize resource allocation.
Integration with Existing Infrastructure: Seamlessly integrates with network hardware and security systems.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Network Visibility: Enhances understanding of network dynamics and performance.
Increased Security Posture: Aids in identifying and mitigating potential threats.
Reduced Downtime: Facilitates quicker troubleshooting and resolution of network issues.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers operational costs by optimizing network resource management.
Compliance Assurance: Helps ensure adherence to regulatory requirements through detailed logging and reporting.

NetFort LANGuardian is implemented across industries like finance and healthcare for its robust security features. It offers tailored solutions to sector-specific challenges, such as regulatory compliance in healthcare and data protection in finance, ensuring enterprises maintain secure and efficient operations.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

City of Armadale, NCG Group, King Faisal Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. NetFort LANGuardian

August 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. NetFort LANGuardian

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. NetFort LANGuardian and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. NetFort LANGuardian report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.