No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages vs Redgate Flyway comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Suppo...
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
484th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Redgate Flyway
Ranking in AWS Marketplace
23rd
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Chaithanya Kutnikar - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Solutions Architect at Capgemini
Modern infrastructure has supported cloud migrations and improved secure distributed workloads
Among the downsides of CentOS 9 | Support by SupportedImages, I find that while installation becomes easier, the migration process concerning mainframes has been well-represented, especially with CentOS 9 | Support by SupportedImages 10 now integrating AI capabilities. The inclusion of GPUs and other resources to process large datasets could be a future direction worth pursuing, enhancing its abilities with RAG or generative AI through proper prompt engineering and ethics considerations. I would prefer to see more AI integrations within CentOS 9 | Support by SupportedImages. IBM is already making strides in this area by investing significantly. Following their acquisition and merger with Red Hat, CentOS 9 | Support by SupportedImages distribution aligns closely with Red Hat's, fostering AI capabilities and a futuristic approach to enhance daily operations through flexible application building on virtual machines.
Hassan F - PeerSpot reviewer
Full Stack Developer at DPL
Automated database releases have reduced errors and now save a full day of deployment effort
The best features that Redgate Flyway offers, if I had to pick a few that really stand out, would be multi-environment support. On the migrations tab, I do not need to go to an environment and change settings or anything. I simply change the branches of the environment and it shows me what is available and what has been run on a certain environment. The environment feature is very user-friendly and helpful, so I would keep it at the top of my list. The feature of changing branches on the migrations tab is very helpful. An example of how Redgate Flyway specifically helped with discrepancies is that previously we did not have any tool recording database changes. We work on an Agile Scrum pattern, so we have to do deployments frequently, within every two to three weeks or sometimes four weeks. Previously, we had code repositories for front-end and back-end, but for the database side, we did not have any repository. We were not saving database-related changes in any GitHub or AWS CodeCommit repositories. Every time, we have a Jira board where developers update their scripts. For example, if I work on a ticket and update a stored procedure, I must mention the stored procedure on the ticket. When deployment time arrives, the release manager must pull out or scan all the tickets and extract the objects. For example, if we deploy 10 Jira tickets from a sprint in the next release, we must go through all 10 tickets and see the post-deployments of their tickets. Then we extracted the objects from the development environment, deployed on stage, and then deployed on production. In this scenario, many objects and discrepancies occurred. Sometimes a developer or the release manager would forget the object to take to production. Now, after using Redgate Flyway, I have restricted access as the release manager of my team. I manage the release for my team and have restricted developer access to environments other than the development environment. If developers want to take anything to the next environment such as demo, staging, or production, they must make a script. When they create a script, it is in our record. Now, after using Redgate Flyway, we do not need to scan all the tickets on Jira or see the post-deployments of each ticket. We simply view the Redgate Flyway script showing what has been run from this to this version, and what pending deployments need to be run on production. In this way, it has helped tremendously. I can share that the migrations tab and branch changing helped my team in a specific situation during our second last sprint. Two developers were working on the same object, and one change needed to be deployed on stage while another change needed to be deployed on the demo environment, which is our QA level. Our QA and demo are the same environment, and then we have stage and production. We have three environments other than development. Previously, without Redgate Flyway, what could have happened is that we would take the stored procedure from demo if we needed to deploy it on stage and take it directly to stage. This was our previous practice where we would go to the database explorer, take the stored procedure, and move it to the next environment with the ticket. Now with Redgate Flyway, we have different versions of that stored procedure. We simply took the version of the stored procedure that needed to be on stage, and the second version that needed to be on the QA level remained there. Redgate Flyway helped in this case, and we have many cases.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The low cost, low maintenance, support, and latency features of CentOS 9 | Support by SupportedImages are what I appreciate the most about it."
"CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages helps with my application deployment process in general, and I get more productivity with it.I measure this productivity by the earlier build time with another OS, which was 32 minutes; with CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages, we are able to achieve the build time of around 14 to 16 minutes, down from an earlier 32 to 36 minutes."
"CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages is stable as far as I am concerned. It is 100% stable."
"Now using Redgate Flyway, we do not need to do any of this procedure, so this whole process has been eliminated, almost a day is saved, and on release day there are 99% chances that the scripts will run successfully without issues."
"Redgate Flyway streamlines the process of database migration and significantly reduces the time for data migration from twenty to twenty-five days down to five to seven days, thanks to the initial time we took for learning."
"I have seen a return on investment with Redgate Flyway in that time was saved significantly for local development."
"Redgate Flyway has positively impacted my organization by enabling automated database migrations, so there are no manual updates to databases on each deployment to each environment."
"Redgate Flyway has positively impacted my organization by maintaining consistency among developers."
"Redgate Flyway has impacted us very positively because we don't have to manually cover all those things."
 

Cons

"The support system is not very much up to the mark as we have with Ubuntu, and definitely, with respect to CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages, the help or support forum needs to be more comprehensive so that for many issues we need not reinvent the wheel."
"I experienced some lagging or crashing when I migrated to CentOS 9 | Support by SupportedImages 8; this event occurred during the early stage of that version."
"Particularly, the error handling mechanism or the force update or forced migration are things I would like to see improved; it is very hard to understand or debug exactly where this migration has failed, and I would not feel confident doing this in a production environment."
"Sometimes, errors with migrations can be very disappointing, as often it requires deleting everything and starting over."
"Regarding the error mechanism, when we see a Redgate Flyway error in my Spring Boot application, it is very difficult to understand what went wrong."
"I cannot say that it is highly secure, but the features are good."
"I would not recommend Redgate Flyway for any Microsoft-based solutions or .NET, as it is not compatible at all based on my experience."
"Redgate Flyway works well for small teams but presents conflict issues with larger teams due to version control."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AWS Marketplace solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
30%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages?
Pricing challenges may be difficult for me to address since I focus primarily on technical details and tend to negotiate trade-offs based on requirements. When good hardware is present, particularl...
What needs improvement with CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages?
Among the downsides of CentOS 9 | Support by SupportedImages, I find that while installation becomes easier, the migration process concerning mainframes has been well-represented, especially with C...
What is your primary use case for CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages?
CentOS 9 is still in use in my infrastructure operations and support coming from a traditional data center background. I utilized it extensively in projects from 2022 to 2024, including retailers a...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Redgate Flyway?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that we have independent work with a separation of roles. We have those maintaining things concerning databases and a team that manages pric...
What needs improvement with Redgate Flyway?
I choose a rating of nine out of ten for Redgate Flyway because the only point is that sometimes it does not automatically handle the schema versioning. If we write something wrong, it just execute...
What is your primary use case for Redgate Flyway?
My main use case for Redgate Flyway is that it is a migration version control tool. I prefer Redgate Flyway because instead of manually running SQL scripts on different environments like dev, QA, a...
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about CentOS 9 (centos 9) | Support by SupportedImages vs. Redgate Flyway and other solutions. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.