We performed a comparison between CCH Tagetik and Microsoft Power BI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management."I've primarily worked with CCH Tagetik as a consultant, handling implementations and not providing day-to-day user support. I initially appreciated the unified platform, the Ownership Structure Register, which benefits certain entities. The workflow feature is great, but it can become overly detailed and lacks clear guidance on design. The solution is good in terms of storage."
"The most valuable feature of CCH Tagetik is form creation."
"Has an APM, which deals with the details of data and has calculation functions included."
"I appreciate its user-friendliness, especially for business users who may not be very tech-savvy."
"Technical support has been great."
"The user interface is easy to work with."
"It has greatly improved our reporting capabilities."
"It is really flexible. The charts and reports are really nice. You have the flexibility of self-service."
"The visuals are great and make everything look very professional. We can change the look and feel or manipulate the data according to our requirements. It's extremely flexible."
"This solution has improved our ability in making decisions and explaining data."
"I like Microsoft BI's drill-down feature and its overall ease of use."
"The sharing features are vital, especially the ability to share and test different shared dashboards."
"Analytics function is weak. Other products have sum(irate) function and forecasting help function, but Tagetik does not have this clarity."
"The tool's major drawback is the ETL process, which is not up to par with other solutions."
"We faced difficulties while uploading data."
"There is room for improvement, especially on the settings side of the solution."
"It needs a wizard that covers all its options."
"The solution could benefit by allowing deeper data analytics."
"I would like Microsoft to include some inbuilt machine learning so that it becomes point-and-click, rather than us developing models out of API and BI connecting to that and getting the results. That process gets in the way of continuity."
"We have used other solutions and the reporting functionality should be user-friendly and have a drag and drop feature should be available, but Microsoft BI doesn't have these features. When you are creating reports and you can't change as a user. Every time you need one developer or one technical person to make the changes."
"They can improve it in terms of rule-based security. Currently, it has very limited rules."
"Some kind of expression wizard, where the user can build a complex expression without any knowledge of DAX, can be a good addition to the product."
"The look and feel should be updated in terms of the types of dashboards and graphs that you can produce. They aren't as visual as some of its competitors."
"I would like to see more visualization options."
CCH Tagetik is ranked 13th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews while Microsoft Power BI is ranked 1st in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 297 reviews. CCH Tagetik is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Power BI is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CCH Tagetik writes "User-friendly performance management with intuitive approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power BI writes "A complete ecosystem with an builtin ETL tool, good integrations with python and R, and support of DAX and Power Query (M languages)". CCH Tagetik is most compared with SAP Business Planning and Consolidation, Oracle HFM, Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion and IBM Cognos, whereas Microsoft Power BI is most compared with Tableau, Amazon QuickSight, KNIME, Domo and Oracle OBIEE.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.