We performed a comparison between CCH Tagetik and Tableau based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management."The most valuable feature of CCH Tagetik is form creation."
"Has an APM, which deals with the details of data and has calculation functions included."
"I appreciate its user-friendliness, especially for business users who may not be very tech-savvy."
"I've primarily worked with CCH Tagetik as a consultant, handling implementations and not providing day-to-day user support. I initially appreciated the unified platform, the Ownership Structure Register, which benefits certain entities. The workflow feature is great, but it can become overly detailed and lacks clear guidance on design. The solution is good in terms of storage."
"It’s good for quick visualization and being able to quickly consume unstructured data to play around with."
"It's easy to use."
"I have found the solution easy to use and the interface is very good."
"Technical support has been responsive."
"It is an excellent tool for data capture, processing, and visualization."
"A valuable feature of Tableau is that it is a useful tool for small setups. I shuffle between Tableau and MicroStrategy, so I use Tableau for personal purposes more than enterprise. I like the light version of Tableau for personal usage and doing some use cases on my own. When it comes to something small, I use Tableau for setups, rather than any other tool."
"It is very easy to implement and to use."
"The product offers an intuitive user interface, detailed screens and widgets, and the absence of data limitations"
"Analytics function is weak. Other products have sum(irate) function and forecasting help function, but Tagetik does not have this clarity."
"We faced difficulties while uploading data."
"The tool's major drawback is the ETL process, which is not up to par with other solutions."
"There is room for improvement, especially on the settings side of the solution."
"An advanced type of visualization is a bit tricky to create. It has something called a Calculated field, and that sometimes gets a bit difficult to use when you want to create an advanced type of visualization."
"I would like to be able to set the parameters in a more specific manner."
"If you wanted to create something without making it an extra column in the data set, you can't just rename it to a more user-friendly short name."
"There should be more widgets that would help less trained individuals create charts with less difficulty."
"Licensing and pricing options could be made better so that more users would be able to use it."
"In the next release, I would like to be able to have the option to see more raw data that I'm converting on the dashboard."
"The cost of owning the solutions from Tableau is much higher compared to any other analytical solutions."
"In the next release, there should be more information describing each chart because users have a difficult time telling them apart. They should also include the animations/videos, similar to Power BI."
CCH Tagetik is ranked 13th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews while Tableau is ranked 2nd in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools with 290 reviews. CCH Tagetik is rated 7.6, while Tableau is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CCH Tagetik writes "User-friendly performance management with intuitive approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tableau writes "Provides fast data access with in-memory extracts, makes it easy to create visualizations, and saves time". CCH Tagetik is most compared with SAP Business Planning and Consolidation, Oracle HFM, Oracle Hyperion, Anaplan and IBM Cognos, whereas Tableau is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Amazon QuickSight, Domo, SAS Visual Analytics and Databricks.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.