Cavisson NetStorm vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud comparison

Cavisson and OpenText are both solutions in the Load Testing Tools category. Cavisson is ranked #19, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Cavisson holds a 0.5% mindshare in LTT, compared to OpenText’s 9.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cavisson users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Cavisson NetStorm

Read 3 Cavisson NetStorm reviews

197 Views
7 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Read 45 OpenText LoadRunner Cloud reviews

2,703 Views
74 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Cavisson NetStorm

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and Cavisson NetStorm are both in the performance testing solutions category. Data comparisons show LoadRunner Cloud has an advantage in support and pricing, while NetStorm stands out for its feature-rich toolkit.

Features: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers cloud-based scalability, real-time analytics, and extensive load testing across various environments. Cavisson NetStorm provides advanced diagnostics, customization options, and predictive analytics, offering in-depth performance insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud simplifies setup with its straightforward cloud deployment and notable customer support. Cavisson NetStorm, although complex in deployment, benefits from robust customer service for guidance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is recognized for cost-effective initial setup and strong ROI. Cavisson NetStorm, despite higher startup costs, presents long-term benefits with its comprehensive performance analysis capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cavisson NetStorm

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

19th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Load Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Cavisson NetStorm is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is 9.5%, up from 9.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Load Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer1329360

Performance Architect at Kohl's

Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase

NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage. NetStorm has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase. One more great functionality is the ability to control the load runtime by increasing or decreasing the virtual users or pausing the users to keep on repeating the transactions without exiting.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Cloud-based testing accommodates high user scenarios while anticipating location improvement

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines. This scalability and network bandwidth capability are essential for high-scale load testing. Additionally, it allows me to upload common LoadRunner scripts to the cloud for testing without requiring a license for scripting tools, offering a flexible and comfortable high-scale load testing solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way."

"This tool helps to focus on real-time transactions that occur at a very high rate."

"NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."

"Both the professional and cloud versions of Micro Focus LoadRunner use the same scripting or programming to execute performance modeling operations. This feature allows users to use various programming languages such as Java, C, or C++, which can run within either of the two environments. This flexibility in the programming language is a strong point of the software."

"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it."

"The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way."

"OpenText LoadRunner Cloud can scale in a cloud-based environment to support up to ten thousand concurrent users without capacity loss, which is not possible with on-premise solutions on personal machines."

"The beauty of LoadRunner Cloud is that we can use the load generator that is hosted by us on-premises, and we also have the option to use their hosted load generator. If it is a public-hosted application, we can also use their public-hosted load generator, but in our case, all our applications are hosted in our data center, so we are using the on-premise load generator. We have the option to deploy those load generators as we want."

"The product supports a wide variety of technology compared to any other tool."

"The reports are very relevant to the customers’ expectations."

"Keeping up with DevOps, thus the best feature of StormRunner is that we don't have to build and maintain infrastructure anymore."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pros

Cons

"Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window."

"The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs."

"In the next release, we are looking for a JS instrumentation feature that would be helpful in identifying client-side issues at an early stage, or during testing."

"It doesn't provide custom reports. You can only use the default reports which contain irrelevant data or is missing data that we need."

"The analysis feature in OpenText LoadRunner Cloud requires improvement. In-depth analysis tools found in the standalone LoadRunner analysis, such as graph merging and setting granularity, would be beneficial."

"Reporting and analysis need improvement. Compared to the old school LoadRunner Windows application, the reporting and analysis are mediocre in LoadRunner Cloud."

"Its scripting features need improvement."

"I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point."

"The product must provide agents to monitor servers."

"It should have a feature to report with a 99.9 percentile success rate."

"Scriptless automation is an area that can be improved."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"NetStorm is priced well when compared to many well-known tools."

"Pricing is dependent on what you're referring to. If you're talking about the cloud, it's likely competitive. However, if you're talking about the on-premise version, professional or enterprise licenses are required. Prices are on the high side. They are not cheap."

"The pricing is very reasonable and the licensing is straightforward."

"The pricing for OpenText LoadRunner Cloud is average."

"It's a very expensive solution"

"It is expensive compared to other tools."

"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

"The solution is expensive."

"It is neither costly nor cheap. It is not too high and not too low. I know the price of other tools, and LoadRunner Cloud's price is in the medium range."

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Do you recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

I absolutely recommend Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best performance testing tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I find to...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

One of LoadRunner's standout features is its extensive support for various TechStacks and protocols.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud?

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud pricing is flexible, offering a more affordable solution compared to the more expensive on-premise LoadRunner. The hourly usage model allows cost-saving when used rightly.

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Cavisson NetStorm

Compared 100% of the time

More Cavisson NetStorm Competitors

Tricentis NeoLoad vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 29% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 23% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText LoadRunner Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Load Testing Tools

June 2025

Download Cavisson NetStorm product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

May 2025

Download OpenText LoadRunner Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load

Overview

Cavisson NetStorm is a powerful load testing solution that is designed to enable application developers to greatly improve the way their applications function. It employs advanced software that enables it to perform many different tasks. This flexibility gives administrators the ability to test their applications in the way that best meets their needs. Cavisson NetStorm offers users the ability to scale their testing environments. These aspects of the solution are only a couple of the reasons that this platform is the load testing tool of choice of several fortune 100 corporations.

Cavisson NetStorm Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by deploying Cavisson NetStorm include:

Cost-effectiveness. Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective solution that is well worth the price. The wealth of features and the sort of tasks that Cavisson NetStorm can be employed to accomplish make it possible for organizations to create products that perform at peak effectiveness. It starts with a free trial that becomes a quote-based price.

Ease of use. Cavisson NetStorm is intuitive to use so that organizations do not need to formally train employees in its use. Its design saves developers time and makes organizations more productive.

High level of stability. Cavisson NetStorm users don’t need to be concerned that it will crash or suffer other performance-related issues when it handles large test loads. It is extremely stable and can easily handle heavy workloads without suffering from an outage. Administrators can let the solution do its work while maintaining peace of mind.

Gain deep insights into application behaviors. Administrators can leverage Cavisson NetStorm’s monitoring features to observe many different aspects of the application testing process. One such aspect is the way that the applications behave when they are exposed to certain environment types. Users can obtain in-depth insights as the tests run that will help them understand how their applications function in specific situations.

Cavisson NetStorm Features

Some of the many useful features Cavisson NetStorm has to offer include:

Diagnostic alert capabilities. Cavisson NetStorm allows users to create diagnostic warnings prior to the commencement of testing. These alerts warn users when deviations from their pre-set testing parameters are taking place. If the application is behaving in a way that is abnormal, these alerts will make sure that administrators are aware of what is going on.

Test result reporting tools. Cavisson NetStorm offers administrators the ability to create test result reports that can clearly lay out information belonging to a number of different categories. It has prefabricated reporting templates that enable users to illustrate the kinds of information that is most important to them.

Testing dashboards. Cavisson NetStorm comes with a central dashboard that can visually lay out various testing metrics for administrators to view. It also includes dashboards that enable users to view technical or business-related data exclusively.

Performance analysis. Cavisson NetStorm can analyze how specific components of the application are impacting its overall performance. If there is any portion that is negatively impacting its performance, Cavisson NetStorm’s analytical tools will find them so that administrators can remedy the problem.

Cavisson

Do your performance and load testing in the cloud. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud makes it easy to plan, run, and scale performance tests without the need to deploy and manage infrastructure.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group

Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant

Buyer's Guide

Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cavisson NetStorm vs. OpenText LoadRunner Cloud report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.