"Setting up and managing the setup for this solution is okay. It is stable, scalable, and it runs just fine. No issues with technical support."
"Probably the most valuable feature of CB Response is its ability to isolate a host and take it off the network, so it's not spreading anything. We have two security operations centers around the globe. When an SOC analyst sees something on an endpoint, they can use Carbon Black Response to isolate that host from the customer's environment and prevent any kind of lateral spread."
"The most valuable feature is the monitored support behind it."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that the configuration and the usage of the product are not so complicated. For people responsible for using this infrastructure for the first line of workstation monitoring, it's quite easy to use."
"If some unusual activity happens on the network, such as I open administrator sessions in a short duration of an hour on many computers in the lab, it sends me an alert about my network saying that one user opened three, four, or five sessions in one hour. Similarly, if I try to play with the disk size on a computer, it will send me an alert, and it will also stop the operation."
"It's transparent, so it's not something where every user has to press a button to download or do the thing. It is centralized, in fact. Personally, I use Malwarebytes and other tools, which are fine for home use. Cynet is also relatively silent in terms of operation, except when it's required to act."
"The dashboard is beautiful, overall easy of use, and the UBA and NBA features are valued."
"The product is very easy to use. Customers really appreciate that."
"I have found the continued support and pretty much all the features to be valuable. They all stand out as being positive. It continues to detect unusual activity when it's supposed to, and so far we haven't had any issues."
"We are very satisfied with the level of performance we get."
"Training and education for both partner and customer, including product marketing need to be improved."
"There have been some performance issues when deploying on Windows Server, but I believe Carbon Black is working on that."
"The solution just needs to keep maturing and they need to keep up with the threat landscape to ensure they're protecting clients well as time passes."
"They have some things in the pipeline, we understand, and they're going to be able to support Android and all these other devices soon. The key is the devices - which is an aspect that is lacking right now. Every company has that problem, not just Cynet."
"Automation could be improved, and orchestration could be added to the features."
"Linux servers are not supported."
"I'd like to see more data loss prevention within the product."
"Most of their times are in Greenwich Mean Time. I would like to see more local time zones."
"It is an endpoint agent, but they don't have a probe for checking the network traffic. They could improve from this point of view."
"Compliance reports need to improve."
Carbon Black CB Response is ranked 4th in Security Incident Response with 2 reviews while Cynet is ranked 4th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 17 reviews. Carbon Black CB Response is rated 8.6, while Cynet is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Carbon Black CB Response writes "Scalable and stable with good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cynet writes "A complete, transparent, and centralized solution ". Carbon Black CB Response is most compared with Carbon Black CB Defense, Splunk Phantom, Secureworks Red Cloak Threat Detection and Response, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Fidelis Elevate, whereas Cynet is most compared with SentinelOne, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. See our Carbon Black CB Response vs. Cynet report.
We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.