We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"It's user friendly, much better than most tools I have seen."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"Documentation can be improved."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.