CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Nmap comparison

Broadcom and Nmap are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #101, while Nmap is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.7. Broadcom holds a 0.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Nmap’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nmap users who would recommend it.

CA Unified Communications M...

Read 2 CA Unified Communications Monitor reviews

379 Views
250 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Nmap

Read 22 Nmap reviews

1,259 Views
1,083 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CA Unified Communications M...

Nmap

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

CA Unified Communications Monitor and Nmap are competitors in business communication oversight and network security, respectively. Data comparisons indicate that CA Unified Communications Monitor has the upper hand in comprehensive support and monitoring, while Nmap stands out in features and cost-effectiveness.

Features: CA Unified Communications Monitor offers integrated communication management, performance tracking, and analytics that enhance operational efficiency. Nmap is recognized for network scanning, host discovery, and security auditing with customizable features. Their focus differs as CA specializes in enterprise networks, and Nmap aligns with network security.

Room for Improvement: CA Unified Communications Monitor could improve in making its deployment process less complex, providing more flexible pricing, and enhancing user interface simplicity. Nmap may benefit from offering more structured support options, including live customer service, expanding its user interface for non-technical users, and providing detailed documentation for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deployment of CA Unified Communications Monitor is typically complex, suitable for large implementations with robust customer support. Nmap's open-source nature allows easier deployment, relying on community support rather than structured customer service.

Pricing and ROI: CA Unified Communications Monitor may involve higher costs initially but targets long-term ROI through detailed analytics. Nmap offers a cost-effective approach as a free open-source tool, providing notable ROI in security and network analysis for budget-conscious customers.

To learn more, read our detailed CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nmap Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nmap

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA Unified Communications M...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

101st

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Communications Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (68th)

Nmap

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of CA Unified Communications Monitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nmap is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

itarchit489981

IT Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features

The solution should have automatic baseline detection. On the per hour, per base, per week. That's usually the best. And on a per individual CI level. I know that they're working on it and when that's available then we will definitely implement it because it will reduce the effort we need to maintain all the products. Right now we have to set thresholds for every location, and it needs to be actually dynamic so if we have better thresholding, we'll have faster alarms across all our locations. We won't have to expend effort on it by resetting or checking them on a regular basis.

Read full review

AntoSebastin

Cyber Security Consultant - APAC at Logon Software

Scans the network and identifies vulnerabilities on each machine

Nmap is mostly helpful during compliance checks. We run the scanner to see how many devices are on our network and find vulnerabilities in those that aren't compliant. We also use it monthly to scan our network and identify devices that aren't connected properly. This helps us detect any issues related to the operating systems of these devices. The tool's most valuable feature is its vulnerability scanning. It allows us to scan a specific range of IP addresses and discover devices within that range. This makes it easy to identify devices and view their details. Port scanning is crucial for network management tasks. It helps us identify vulnerabilities by finding open ports that may be unused or misconfigured. This tool makes it easy to detect such issues. The OS detection feature is great. Unlike other tools, Nmap provides accurate information about asset vulnerabilities, helping us easily detect and address them. Using Nmap provides value to the company, especially during compliance audits. It helps generate reports on assets, updates on workstations, and insights into network activities and potential attacks. Additionally, Nmap detects vulnerabilities and provides port details, allowing us to close unused ports on the client machines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

"Good end-to-end monitoring"

"The most important function, according to me, is the capability to use some arguments in the scanning. The solution's capability to go figure and do a deep dive, discovering information on specific aspects."

"Nmap is easy to use. It's a command-line interface, and the output is quite good."

"From a functionality standpoint, it's robust and straightforward to comprehend."

"The best feature of Nmap is that it lets me see useful information about each endpoint in my entire network environment. For example, I can see every single connection of the network as well as each and every port."

"Nmap has a powerful command line tool and a set of diagnostic features."

"It helps us secure the network infrastructure."

"The initial setup was simple."

"It enables us to delve deeper and identify the services and open ports on the system and visualize this information on a dashboard automatically."

More Nmap pros

Cons

"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved."

"The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

"One of the drawbacks of the standard Nmap utility is that it does not come with a graphical user interface, unlike a number of other open-source alternatives such as Zenmap."

"There is room for improvement in the design, the GUI. It looks a bit odd. Maybe Nmap should improve it or add more widgets to make it more attractive, but the basic functionality is good and provides what we need."

"The challenge often lies in finding suitable courses and professional resources."

"There could be a specific option to check non-pingable endpoints for the product."

"The price is high and could be cheaper."

"The tool's license limits the number of scans it can perform. Improving the license model could benefit customers by allowing more scans for compliance and other purposes."

"There are concerns with the stability of the product, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The solution should increase the number of features under a free license."

More Nmap cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Nmap is open source software, which suits us well because we are a manufacturing company and not an IT company, for example. If we were an IT company, we would probably need to pay for extra support or instead go for another software solution. But as it is, we don't have any need for high-end troubleshooting tools."

"It's an open-source solution. Commerically, only the support service is available."

"Nmap is an open-source product. You don't need a license to install it."

"I am using the free version of Nmap."

"The solution is free of cost."

"The solution is free of cost, but there are specific services that we have to buy."

"The solution is open source so it is free."

"I am using the standard free version of Nmap."

More Nmap pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Retailer

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Nmap?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nmap?

I am using the free version of Nmap.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nmap?

Nmap is used for network scanning to map the network, identify devices, and assess their status. It helps determine open ports and services running on a particular endpoint or server within an ente...

See all answers

Comparisons

Icinga vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 44% of the time

Precisely Network Management vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 29% of the time

ITRS Geneos vs CA Unified Communications Monitor

Compared 27% of the time

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Competitors

Zabbix vs Nmap

Compared 16% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Nmap

Compared 12% of the time

LiveAction LiveNX vs Nmap

Compared 10% of the time

Nagios Core vs Nmap

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Nmap

Compared 9% of the time

More Nmap Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. ScienceLogic

August 2025

CA Unified Communications Monitor report

Download CA Unified Communications Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Nmap

August 2025

Download Nmap product report

Also Known As

CA UC Monitor

No data available

Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Broadcom

Nmap ("Network Mapper") is a free and open source (license) utility for network discovery and security auditing. Many systems and network administrators also find it useful for tasks such as network inventory, managing service upgrade schedules, and monitoring host or service uptime. Nmap uses raw IP packets in novel ways to determine what hosts are available on the network, what services (application name and version) those hosts are offering, what operating systems (and OS versions) they are running, what type of packet filters/firewalls are in use, and dozens of other characteristics. It was designed to rapidly scan large networks, but works fine against single hosts. Nmap runs on all major computer operating systems, and official binary packages are available for Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X. In addition to the classic command-line Nmap executable, the Nmap suite includes an advanced GUI and results viewer (Zenmap), a flexible data transfer, redirection, and debugging tool (Ncat), a utility for comparing scan results (Ndiff), and a packet generation and response analysis tool (Nping).

Nmap

Sample Customers

BBVA Compass

Lockheed Martin, Eastern Bank Boston, Perspecta, Harris Corporation, Discovery Communication

Buyer's Guide

CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nmap

July 2025

Free Report: CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nmap

Find out what your peers are saying about CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nmap and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA Unified Communications Monitor vs. Nmap report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.